What's new

Who is Responsible When Climate Change Harms the world’s Poorest Countries?

beijingwalker

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
65,195
Reaction score
-55
Country
China
Location
China

Who is Responsible When Climate Change Harms the world’s Poorest Countries?​

Nov. 4 2022

You may be hearing the phrase “loss and damage” in the coming weeks as government leaders meet in Egypt for the 2022 UN Climate Change Conference.

It refers to the costs, both economic and physical, that developing countries are facing from climate change impacts. Many of the world’s most climate-vulnerable countries have done little to cause climate change, yet they are experiencing extreme heat waves, floods and other climate-related disasters. They want wealthier nations – historically the biggest sources of greenhouse gas emissions – to pay for the harm.

A powerful example is Pakistan, where extreme rainfall on the heels of a glacier-melting heat wave flooded nearly one-third of the country in the summer of 2022.

The flooding turned Pakistan’s farm fields into miles-wide lakes that stranded communities for weeks. More than 1,700 people died, millions lost their homes and livelihoods, and more than 4 million acres of crops and orchards, as well as livestock, drowned or were damaged. This was followed by a surge in malaria cases as mosquitoes bred in the stagnant water.

Pakistan contributes only about 1% of the global greenhouse gas emissions driving climate change. But greenhouse gases don’t stay within national borders – emissions anywhere affect the global climate. A warming climate intensifies rainfall, and studies suggest climate change may have increased Pakistan’s rainfall intensity by as much as 50%.

The question of payments for loss and damage has been a long-standing point of negotiation at United Nations climate conferences, held nearly every year since 1995, but there has been little progress toward including a financial mechanism for these payments in international climate agreements.

Many developing countries are looking to this year’s conference, COP27, as a crucial moment for making progress on establishing that formal mechanism.

Africa’s climate conference

With Egypt hosting this year’s U.N. climate conference, it’s not surprising that loss and damage will take center stage.

Countries in Africa have some of the lowest national greenhouse gas emissions, and yet the continent is home to many of the world’s most climate-vulnerable countries.

The countries most vulnerable to climate change

The Notre Dame Global Adaptation Initiative index gauges countries’ vulnerability based on their exposure, sensitivity and ability to adapt to the negative impacts of climate change.

image01.png


To deal with climate change, these countries – many of them among the world’s poorest – will have to invest in adaptation measures, such as seawalls, climate-smart agriculture and infrastructure that’s more resilient to high heat and extreme storms. The UN Environment Program’s Adaptation Gap Report, released Nov. 3, 2022, found that developing countries need five to 10 times more international adaptation finance than wealthier countries are providing.

When climate disasters strike, countries also need more financial help to cover relief efforts, infrastructure repairs and recovery. This is loss and damage.

Egypt is emphasizing the need for wealthy countries to make more progress on providing financial support for both adaptation and loss and damage.

Annual carbon dioxide emissions per capita

Africa produced about 1.1 metric tons of climate-warming carbon dioxide emissions per person in 2019, well below the global average of 4.7. The U.S. produced 16.1 metric tons per capita.

image1.png


Climate injustice and loss and damage

The conversation on loss and damage is inherently about equity. It evokes the question: Why should countries that have done little to cause global warming be responsible for the damage resulting from the emissions of wealthy countries?

That also makes it contentious. Negotiators know that the idea of payments for loss and damage has the potential to lead to further discussions about financial compensation for historical injustices, such as slavery in the United States or colonial exploitation by European powers.

At COP26, held in 2021 in Glasgow, Scotland, negotiators made progress on some key issues, such as stronger emissions targets and pledges to double adaptation finance for developing countries. But COP26 was seen as a disappointment by advocates trying to establish a financial mechanism for wealthier nations to provide finance for loss and damage in developing countries.

carbo-dioxide.png


What loss and damage payments might look like

The lack of resolution at COP26, combined with Egypt’s commitment to focus on financing for adaptation and loss and damage, means the issue will be on the table this year.

The nonprofit Center for Climate and Energy Solutions expects discussions to focus on institutional arrangements for the Santiago Network for Loss and Damage, which focuses on providing technical assistance to help developing countries minimize loss and damage; and on fine-tuning the Glasgow Dialogue, a formal process developed in 2021 to bring countries together to discuss funding for loss and damage.

The V20 group of finance ministers, representing 58 countries highly vulnerable to climate change, and the G-7 group of wealthy nations also reached an agreement in October 2022 on a financial mechanism called the Global Shield Against Climate Risks. The Global Shield is focused on providing risk insurance and rapid financial assistance to countries after disasters, but it’s unclear how it will fit into the international discussions. Some groups have raised concerns that relying on insurance systems can overlook the poorest people and distract from the larger discussion of establishing a dedicated fund for loss and damage.

Two elements of developed countries’ reluctance to formalize a loss and damage mechanism involve how to determine which countries or communities are eligible for compensation and what the limitations of such a mechanism would be.

What would a threshold for loss and damage eligibility look like? Limiting countries or communities from receiving compensation for loss and damage based on their current emissions or gross domestic product could become a problematic and complicated process. Most experts recommend determining eligibility based on climate vulnerability, but this can also prove difficult.

How will world leaders respond?

Over a decade ago, developed countries committed to provide US$100 billion per year to fund adaptation and mitigation in developing countries. But they have been slow to meet that commitment, and it does not cover the damages from the climate impacts the world is already seeing today.

Establishing a loss and damage mechanism is considered one avenue to provide recourse for global climate injustice. All eyes will be on Egypt Nov. 6-18, 2022, to see how world leaders respond.

 
. . . . . .
Every man for himself. If our counties not able to deal with changing environment we deserve to go extinct.. . Japanese adapted to storms earthquakes. Heck even Europeans adapted to the harsh climates of the tropics and outcompeted the natives. Some cultures just win. Others complain and don't do anything.
 
.
Do you choose to be blind?

View attachment 894640
i would not go for commulative carbon dioxide emission since 1750 , that is not how it work and is misleading .
it tell you nothing its useless . a better way is this
41598_2016_Article_BFsrep20281_Fig1_HTML.jpg


in upper half of the map the countries with highest amount of emission are dark red
in lower map the countries least effective with global climate change are dark red .

now you can decide for yourself which countries are the climate free riders and which are the climate forced riders

Every man for himself. If our counties not able to deal with changing environment we deserve to go extinct.. . Japanese adapted to storms earthquakes. Heck even Europeans adapted to the harsh climates of the tropics and outcompeted the natives. Some cultures just win. Others complain and don't do anything.
wrong the map i posted show who are more responsible for climate change and who are more susceptible to it . it clearly show some major responsible like USA , Russia , western Europe are less likely to be affected by it

your logic is like some people live along a river , and the people upper-hand pour poison in the river and say if the people who live lower-part of the river can't cope by it they deserve to die

Every man for himself. If our counties not able to deal with changing environment we deserve to go extinct.. . Japanese adapted to storms earthquakes. Heck even Europeans adapted to the harsh climates of the tropics and outcompeted the natives. Some cultures just win. Others complain and don't do anything.
wrong the map i posted show who are more responsible for climate change and who are more susceptible to it . it clearly show some major responsible like USA , Russia , western Europe are less likely to be affected by it

your logic is like some people live along a river , and the people upper-hand pour poison in the river and say if the people who live lower-part of the river can't cope by it they deserve to die
 
Last edited:
.
Annual carbon dioxide emissions per capita
Africa produced about 1.1 metric tons of climate-warming carbon dioxide emissions per person in 2019, well below the global average of 4.7. The U.S. produced 16.1 metric tons per capita.

image1.png


Why is Mongolia's per capita emission so high??? In fact, it looks like it is the highest!! Also, western Europe per capita figures appears way lower than it should be.
 
.
Why is Mongolia's per capita emission so high??? In fact, it looks like it is the highest!! Also, western Europe per capita figures appears way lower than it should be.
You don't know how cold Mongolia is in winter, even in Inner Mongolia, the winter bitterness is unbearable.
 
.
You don't know how cold Mongolia is in winter, even in Inner Mongolia, the winter bitterness is unbearable.

I know Mongolia is cold... But still per capita emission appears to be extremally high.

For example, Greenland, Scandinavia etc. are also extremely cold places. On top of that industrialization , vehicle use etc. will be way higher than Mongolia.

1668420728158.png
 
.
I know Mongolia is cold... But still per capita emission appears to be extremally high.

For example, Greenland, Scandinavia etc. are also extremely cold places. On top of that industrialization , vehicle use etc. will be way higher than Mongolia.

View attachment 896468
add the technologies they have access to to that by the way i don't think that s correct the map i post show different things
 
.

China has ‘every right’ to use cheap energy to make itself a ‘superpower’


 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom