Aijaz Ahmed talks about how the NPT agreement cannot be applied to Iran and others, simply because NPT was based on the promise that all nuclear weapons in the world would be destroyed, but they aren't.
Last edited by a moderator:
Who can and who can't have nuclear weapons?
- Thread starter falconfx
- Start date
T-Rex
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2008
- Messages
- 9,989
- Reaction score
- -11
- Country
- Location
Americans are so stupid in the way they handle there foreign policy. Its totally based on hipocracy.
Iran has the right to peaceful use of Nukes
All the best for them in their endeavor
This is the US stand:
Israel and its allies are pecaeful states (Hirishima and Nagasaki, Vietnam War, Israeli occupation of Palestine are all burning examples of that) so they have the devine right to possess WMD. Other states, like Iran and Venezuela, are simply too violent, they dare to demand sovereignty, they reject uncle sam's prescriptions; if these states possess WMD the ongoing nuclear blackmail by peaceful states like the US and Israel will be largely ineffective and naturally uncle sam will become very restless and violent for being stripped of its devine right and that is, of course, a threat to world peace and stabilty. So countries like Iran and Venezuela must not possess WMD.
Similar threads
