-blitzkrieg-
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2015
- Messages
- 6,376
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
so what..where is its connection to the past its popular for.. another legend...LOL.
It is a mosque currently in use.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
so what..where is its connection to the past its popular for.. another legend...LOL.
It is a mosque currently in use.
It was established a mosque, at that time also .it has always been a mosque , it says the graves have been used many times since 6th century.so what..where is its connection to the past its popular for.. another legend...
My fault. I should have spelt it out carefully, considering I m addressing a lawyer.so what..where is its connection to the past its popular for.. another legend...
We are a land starved country. Not much space for graves. Construction and redevelopment is happening all the time. Places get dug up. Secondly, we don't do much record keeping of our ancestors therefore after a point no one cares where previous generations were buried. No one visits and the sites are forgotten
the topic is about earliest graveyard not mosque..
and whats the point in bringing in a something not proven so far..
kerala structure you folks are talking about is suspected to be a mosque... it could have been anything..
My fault. I should have spelt it out carefully, considering I m addressing a lawyer.
This is a mosque that is thought to be perhaps the second oldest mosque whose existence is recorded. It is still in use.
Mosques from those times dont look like a 18th century structureMy fault. I should have spelt it out carefully, considering I m addressing a lawyer.
This is a mosque that is thought to be perhaps the second oldest mosque whose existence is recorded. It is still in use.
All I am saying is that if there were Muslims living there at that time, they would be dying too, and would be needing graveyards. Whether these are still there or not, I don't know. But I get it, OP is asking for ones still intact.the topic is about earliest graveyard not mosque..
and whats the point in bringing in a something not proven so far..
kerala structure you folks are talking about is suspected to be a mosque... it could have been anything..
Unfortunately our people would believe all their stories till the murti comes in..They'll start digging for murtis in that mosque and start claiming it be an ancient temple
Are you making list for demolishing or what?Also , reply if anybody here knows any haunted mughal or earlier monuments in the subcontinent
Just myths/legends/tall tales...In delhi many places are haunted
They need to prove nothing; this is not a competition. There are no prizes to be won. There are no insecure egos to be stroked. For your information, the most recent repairs to the mosque happened only recently; it was not left as a heap of stones but embellished over the centuries as and when it was deemed necessary.Mosques from those times dont look like a 18th century structure
but more like this..
View attachment 846038
the bhanbhore site’s surface remains represent the best preserved early Islamic urban form in South Asia and the region’s best preserved medieval port.
It has been recognized as oldest mosque in south asia by UNESCO..
This was a major muslim city of south Asia back then infact the first one...Cheraman and outher indian sites need to prove their case..
Nothing, much i was just curious.Are you making list for demolishing or what?
Nothing, much i was just curious.Are you making list for demolishing or what?
This makes no sense whatsoeverUnfortunately our people would believe all their stories till the murti comes in..
What's wrong with Indian subcontinent though? It's the name of a geographic region. There's also Indian ocean and regions named after other countries right?Should you not be asking him to correct it as South Asia? Or do ypu like being trapped in Indian narrative?