What's new

Where is the evidence of Nawaz Sharif's narrative?

Brother,

Where is the Name of Nawaz Sharif??? in the documents which u r presenting.

Who was/were the director(s) of Hudabiya? Well, this decree alone nullifies the Qatari prince letter which claims he owned those properties till 2006. If he, the prince, was the owner how could flats be charged with loan amount which Sharifs took?
 
.
Brother,

Where is the Name of Nawaz Sharif??? in the documents which u r presenting.

Fair enough..

This document is to prove that what Qatari stated in his self declaration is wrong. NS case is primarily being defended on the basis of one and only one document.. and that is Qatari statement.

If this decree is taken into consideration, three people had beneficial interest in these assets.
 
.
Who was/were the director(s) of Hudabiya? Well, this decree alone nullifies the Qatari prince letter in which claims he owned those properties till 2006. If he, the prince, was the owner how could flats be charged with loan amount which Sharifs took?

Brother,

do remember that this case is of corruption of Nawaz sharif, secondly Hussain nawaz in his reply said these Flats were purchased in 2006 as settlement of companies shares!

so the document which not belong to Nawaz sharif and his son, is never be a evidence.

Fair enough..

This document is to prove that what Qatari stated in his self declaration is wrong. NS case is primarily being defended on the basis of one and only one document.. and that is Qatari statement.

If this decree is taken into consideration, three people had beneficial interest in these assets.

brother,

keep remember , that case is Nawaz sharif's corruption! and how he send money outside Pakistan.
 
.
Brother,

do remember that this case is of corruption of Nawaz sharif, secondly Hussain nawaz in his reply said these Flats were purchased in 2006 as settlement of companies shares!

so the document which not belong to Nawaz sharif and his son, is never be a evidence.

Of course this case is about alleged corruption/embezzlement done by NS, but wait a minute where's is the money trail and date of purchase of the flats? Needless to remind that Hussain Nawaz was a minor child back then. Now again how can Sharifs obtain loan against flats as collateral when they don't own them? It is also an evidence because Hudabiya belongs to NS through Hussain Nawaz being a minor director and Kulsoom Nawaz as an adult director.

FYI Hussain Nawaz never said in his reply that flats were acquired through settlement of accounts.

Help me understand how property gotten charged with loan amount? Qatari prince was the owner till 2006, he claims that in his letter.
 
.
Brother,

do remember that this case is of corruption of Nawaz sharif, secondly Hussain nawaz in his reply said these Flats were purchased in 2006 as settlement of companies shares!

so the document which not belong to Nawaz sharif and his son, is never be a evidence.



brother,

keep remember , that case is Nawaz sharif's corruption! and how he send money outside Pakistan.

Yes, once the Qatari letter submitted by the children is torn apart, and they are proved to be certified liars (because of the self declaration certificate they provided to save themselves and their father and sister), we will concentrate on the PM. Is it fine with you?
 
.
There's one case being fought in SC and another being fought on the media (inc social media) by the media Cell.

Martyrdom by desired Martial Law failed so PMLN team are out to malign the Judiciary and molest public opinion so that they can beat the drums of Martyrdom by Judiciary.

I don't think the judges are asking for more evidence, they've seen what they need to. It seems they just want PTI lawyers to pin point it out.
 
.
Brother,

do remember that this case is of corruption of Nawaz sharif, secondly Hussain nawaz in his reply said these Flats were purchased in 2006 as settlement of companies shares!

so the document which not belong to Nawaz sharif and his son, is never be a evidence.



brother,

keep remember , that case is Nawaz sharif's corruption! and how he send money outside Pakistan.


Seriously? The proofs of this family being a bunch of liars, corrupt, money launders are in front of your eyes and you still choose to be blind.......why? don't you love your country? don't you love your fellow countrymen? don't you want Pakistan to progress? For god sake, open your eyes, if not for yourself then do it for your future generations
 
.
Naeem ul Haq claims to have gotten some evidence.
x2747970_35597682.jpg.pagespeed.ic.AMrDSpgYPj.webp


Pti has habit of lying.. those papers cannot be produced legally without uk court order
 
.
Pti has habit of lying.. those papers cannot be produced legally without uk court order

What if PTI brings a "self declaration" from a lawyer that states that NS family bought the property in 1993 and he is a witness of that transaction, get this statement notarized, hands it over to PTI which they later submit it to court?

If Qatari statement is a trusted document, why shouldn't this document be trusted?
 
.
What if PTI brings a "self declaration" from a lawyer that states that NS family bought the property in 1993 and he is a witness of that transaction, get this statement notarized, hands it over to PTI which they later submit it to court?

If Qatari statement is a trusted document, why shouldn't this document be trusted?

Then the lawyer will banned permanently from practicing and fined millions for breach of confendiatiality..

If lawyers started telling on their clients... the modern legal system will cease to exisist
 
.
Sir here is the proof that you were asking for, this will be presented in the next hearing

London High court papers, where the sharif family was ordered to pay the money owing to Al-Towfeek Company or the apartments will be conficated

P.S. check the date

15055719_10154262345429527_3974905803184120326_n.jpg

15134687_10154262345589527_8522525224869398703_n.jpg

15079007_10154262345769527_1091342795727999854_n.jpg


Source: https://defence.pk/threads/panama-l...s-and-discussion.459474/page-16#ixzz4QdPzJzlN
Good Job @Imad.Khan !!! :cheers: This confirms the flats were bought in between 1990s and not in 2006, which also confirms Sharif & family are lying in-front of SC. Also look at the Judgment date it is 5th Nov 1999. This letter also confirms that Hudabiya paper mill has three owners Shebaz,Mian Sharif and Abbas Sharif. So Hussian Nawaz claim also become a lie as well as the Qatari prince letter:rofl:. This London court order will completely decimate this Corrupt family Insha Allah.:pakistan:
 
Last edited:
.
Then the lawyer will banned permanently from practicing and fined millions for breach of confendiatiality..

If lawyers started telling on their clients... the modern legal system will cease to exisist

That will be dealt with later. But tell me what will happen in SC?
 
.
When documentary trail is provided to court as per prevalent law of the country and courts stay mum - we know how and what form of justice can be served.

This story is known to all of us here; so sitting Finance Minister tells entire strategy how money was laundered; which is 100% traceable but nobody traces it; then what recourse is available in that country?

http://www.dawn.com/news/848873

Sharifs used paper mill to whiten money, Dar told court in 2000
— PUBLISHED Nov 13, 2009 12:00am

ISLAMABAD, Nov 12 The Musharraf government prepared a money laundering reference against PML-N leaders Mian Nawaz Sharif and Mian Shahbaz Sharif in 2000 on the basis of a statement recorded by one of their trusted lieutenants, Senator Ishaq Dar, according to a court document seen by Dawn here on Thursday.

Senator Dar's handwritten statement, given before a magistrate back on April 25, 2000, had alleged that Sharif brothers used the Hudaibya Paper Mills as cover for money laundering during the late 1990s.

The reference was prepared on the orders of then president Pervez Musharraf, but it was shelved after the Sharif brothers went into exile in December of the same year.

The Musharraf government tried to reopen the reference in 2007 after Nawaz Sharif announced his return to the country.

The confessional statement of Senator Ishaq Dar was recorded before a district magistrate in Lahore. He was brought to the court from a jail by Basharat Shahzad, who was then serving as assistant director in the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA).

According to legal experts, the senator's deposition was an 'irrevocable statement' as had been recorded under section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC).

Senator Ishaq Dar has always been regarded as one of the closest aides of the Sharif family, and is now also a relative as his son is married to Nawaz Sharif's younger daughter.

However, the NAB record clearly shows that back in 2000 he had agreed to give a written statement against the Sharifs about their alleged involvement in money laundering.

The top PML-N leaders had hit a rough patch by then as some of their lieutenants were busy developing a new political system for Gen Pervez Musharraf after his Oct 1999 military coup.

In the statement, Ishaq Dar accused Nawaz and Shahbaz Sharif of money laundering in the Hudaibiya Paper Mills case. At one point in the 43-page statement, Mr Dar said that on the instructions of Mian Nawaz Sharif and Shahbaz Sharif, “I opened two foreign currency accounts in the name of Sikandara Masood Qazi and Talat Masood Qazi with the foreign currency funds provided by the Sharif family in the Bank of America by signing as Sikandara Masood Qazi and Talat Masood Qazi”.

He said that all instructions to the bank in the name of these two persons were signed by him under the orders of “original depositors”, namely Mian Nawaz Sharif and Mian Shahbaz Sharif.

“The foreign currency accounts of Nuzhat Gohar and Kashif Masood Qazi were opened in Bank of America by Naeem Mehmood under my instructions (based on instructions of Sharifs) by signing the same as Nuzhat Gohar and Kashif Masood Qazi.”

The document shows Dar stated that besides these foreign currency accounts, a previously opened foreign currency account of Saeed Ahmed, a former director of First Hajvari Modaraba Co and close friend of Dar, and of Mussa Ghani, the nephew of Dar's wife, were also used to deposit huge foreign currency funds provided by “the Sharif family” to offer them as collateral to obtain different direct and indirect credit lines.

Senator Dar had disclosed that the Bank of America, Citibank, Atlas Investment Bank, Al Barka Bank and Al Towfeeq Investment Bank were used under the instructions of the Sharif family.

Interestingly enough, Ishaq Dar also implicated himself by confessing in court that he — along with his friends Kamal Qureshi and Naeem Mehmood — had opened fake foreign currency accounts in different international banks.

Mr Dar said an amount of $3.725 million in Emirates Bank, $ 8.539 million in Al Faysal Bank and $2.622 million were later transferred in the accounts of the accounts Hudaibya Paper Mills.

He said that the entire amount in these banks finally landed in the accounts of the paper mills.

The Hudaibiya Paper Mills case is still pending in the National Accountability Bureau.

If it is opened again, the Sharif brothers may be in for a rude shock a confidant is to blame for the albatross around their necks.

In this regard Dawn made repeated efforts to contact Senator Dar on telephone, but without luck as his mobile number was switched off and he did not reply to text messages.

However, a PML-N spokesman Siddiq ul Farooq alleged that the signed statement was extracted from Mr Ishaq Dar under duress.

That will be dealt with later. But tell me what will happen in SC?

If there is No Full Disclosure by Client - where that money was coming from - Law Firm can use the clause to protect it's reputation instead of being labeled as part of the ring who does money laundering.
 
.
That will be dealt with later. But tell me what will happen in SC?


In my honest opinion ... its 50 50... even pmln knows that ... back up pm name is already agreed upon wth military...

Its not pti responsibility to get proof... nor do they have any capacity to do so...
Its bit of a shame that they kept crying on top of their voice that they had proofs... but came up with news paper cuttings

If there is No Full Disclosure by Client - where that money was coming from - Law Firm can use the clause to protect it's reputation instead of being labeled as part of the ring who does money laundering.


But only if any uk laws are being broken.. and only if there is grave crime
 
.
In my honest opinion ... its 50 50... even pmln knows that ... back up pm name is already agreed upon wth military...

Its not pti responsibility to get proof... nor do they have any capacity to do so...
Its bit of a shame that they kept crying on top of their voice that they had proofs... but came up with news paper cuttings

If the bench carries out impartial and independent "inquiry", it will ask the FIA or NAB to write letters to relevant authorities in UK for attested documentary evidences. In that case, there is a 100% chance of NS disqualification, not just because of money laundering, but because of articles 62 and 63.

From an inquiry standpoint, PTI has provided sufficient proofs to the court to let them start the investigation and trial. This is what PTI had to do and it has already done its task.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom