When TTP terrorist were attacking on border fencing , Bajwa was busy in political engineering : Imran khan

[Conqueror]

Bajwa is a symptom, not the cause.

You want to say Laenat Allah Ela all Core Commands too who joined Bajwa is destroying my country?

 

[Goenitz]

Thing is the Colonial powers carved out swathes of lands for a reason, the Durand line was put where it is for a reason and that is to create division and then easily create chaos across a nation. This is what we see today

It wasn't a conspiracy but what Imperial India could get favourably to save its empire from Tsar's Russia. BTW Durand's line is beyond today's border, and we have conceded many areas (or by British)

A massive drive needs to occur where people who live near the Afghan border feel like Pakistani some sort of education centres, these ethnic divisions need to drop.

That is true, but we don't have enough funds. If people are educated and go west, they will be officers back to their native area and will reshape the landscape. Mostly now are skilled workers working in ME.

 

[SIPRA]

You want to say Laenat Allah Ela all Core Commands too who joined Bajwa is destroying my country?

Of course. Sub Haraami thay, haen, aur rahain gay.

 

[HAIDER]

That was a bad move. We need legislation that foreigners need to pass certain criteria like Urdu language proficiency, Pak Studies, and some investment to be able to get citizenship. Or like permanent residency or refugee card in case, they cannot go back to Afghanistan.

I already asked the question of why it is easy for IEA to make us angry but not TTP. We must raise the cost for IEA by completely stopping smuggling, sending back families who have strong family ties in Afghanistan and have many boys forcefully, etc.

Afghanistan has been isolated for centuries and has been under war for 50 years. Their minuscule interaction with the foreign world makes them less diplomatic, aggressive and hostile towards foreign/foreign input (Pakistan or west). Fighting is their first policy.
@Mirzali Khan @Behram Khilji is that cruel?

The great gift of Zia ul Haq, who allowed them to come to a settled area of Pakistan. I have posted one example of Hafiz Hamad ullah. His case of revocation of nationality was under consideration by NADRA. But no one dares to pursue his case.
This mullah is an Afghan refugee. NADRA comes under the federal govt, PTI tried to change the laws but ......birth law for Afghans needs to be changed....but who will do it and who will implement it.

 

[Goenitz]

it was for raja adil . in uk
View attachment 908322

the alcoholist in london

ahhh.. ok.

 

[Riz]

WELL , we wont be having this -----if mushraf was hanged from the lamp post,-- but PTI- ggons saved him,
now public is being hanged from every lamp post -

get the hanging list right atleast..............

PTI saved him ? musharif left the country in 2008 when zardari was ruling the country , kabhi to dimag sa soch lia karo jahil patwario

 

[SIPRA]

Futile discussion.

All, what we need, is a Non-Haraami COAS, for a period of 6 years. But we wouldn't get it. Pakistan never got one.

 

[Enigma SIG]

Futile discussion.

All, what we need, is a Non-Haraami COAS, for a period of 6 years. But we wouldn't get it.

When you have a cult, all they will make is cultists.

 

[HAIDER]

Bajwa was busy with regime change operations. And that's what going on at our borders ...Even the Baluchistan border is wide open....

https://twitter.com/x/status/1433107619745574918

 

[Enigma SIG]

Bajwa was busy with regime change operations. And that's what going on at our borders ...Even the Baluchistan border is wide open....

https://twitter.com/x/status/1433107619745574918

Pakistan only controls Wagha border. Rest of the country is wide open.

 

[maithil]

New chap is no different either. Audio/Video leaks continues under his watch. Going as low as leaking Imran's wife's audio.. Lower than his predecessor even..

 

[Baghial]

PTI saved him ? musharif left the country in 2008 when zardari was ruling the country , kabhi to dimag sa soch lia karo jahil patwario

Govt to save ex-ruler in court on appeal: AG​

Syed Irfan Raza Published December 18, 2019




56

Pakistan's Attorney-General Anwar Mansoor Khan gives a press conference following a special court verdict against former military ruler Pervez Musharraf, in Islamabad on December 17. — AFP
ISLAMABAD: Terming the high treason trial against former military ruler Pervez Musharraf “unfair”, the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf government on Tuesday decided to defend the self-exiled, ailing ex-president during the hearing of an appeal to be filed on his behalf.
“I will defend the law in the case but not any individual,” said Attorney General Anwar Mansoor in the late-night joint press conference that he addressed along with Special Assistant to the Prime Minister on Information Dr Firdous Ashiq Awan.
He said former president Musharraf had not been given the right of fair trial during the case tried in a special court and the judgement was announced in absentia without recording statement of the accused.
The attorney general said the verdict raised questions about “urgency in pronouncing the judgement when Mr Musharraf was in critical condition in ICU” in Dubai.

PM’s spokesman slams opposition for ‘maligning the army’ by commenting on decision; MQM-P regrets ruling

“Musharraf was not given a chance to record his statement under Article 342 (of the Constitution), to present his testimony and witnesses and his request to record his statement through video link or before a commission was turned down by the judge,” he added.
“There is no question that a person who had committed treason must be punished but in this case the right of fair trial guaranteed under the Constitution was not ensured. A trial should not just be fair but also seen to be fair,” he insisted.
The AG argued before the media that one of the major flaws in the case was that those who might have assisted Gen Musharraf in enforcing emergency in the country “had not been made party” in the case. He said if Gen Musharraf had been given a chance to record his statement and present his witnesses, he might have come up with “logical” reasons in support of emergency he had proclaimed in 2007.
Mr Mansoor further argued that the complaint against the ex-president had been filed by a former interior secretary, whereas under the 18th Amendment only a prime minister and members of his cabinet have powers to authorise any person for filing such petitions/complaints.
Asked if he committed a contempt of court by declaring the trial “unfair” during his media talk, the attorney general said: “Once the verdict is announced it becomes a public document and everyone can comment on it.” At the same time, he added, he had tried his best to get a copy of the judgement but he was asked by the court that it would be issued after 48 hours.
The PM’s aide on information, however, criticised the opposition for what she said “maligning the army” and “harming the interest of the state” by commenting on the decision.
In a TV talk show, spokesman for the PM Nadeem Afzal Chan said that institutions should not get themselves involved in any controversy on the judgement, as it was a verdict against an individual. He also urged the nation and institutions to move forward and not to get themselves involved in any controversy.
“Here [in the country] we have faced hanging of prime minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, assassination of ex-prime minister Benazir Bhutto and horrible tragedy of Army Public School, but [we] moved forward,” he added.
The PM spokesman was of the opinion that all stakeholders should exercise patience on the judgement. He said: “When we criticise the judiciary for not taking decisions against military generals and when we condemn lawyers for creating a fuss in Lahore then people can also comment on Musharraf.”
“Had the people stopped doing politics when ex-PM Bhutto was hanged,” he said and again appealed to the nation to move forward after the high treason case verdict.
Mr Chan, however, demanded that action be taken against the accomplices of Gen Musharraf who had assisted him or endorsed his act of enforcing emergency in the country in 2007.
The Muttahida Qaumi Movement-Pakistan termed the decision against Gen Musharraf “extremely regrettable”.
“What kind of justice is this that those looted national wealth are considered patriots but the man who put his life at stake for the sake of country has been declared a traitor,” wondered MQM-P convener Dr Khalid Maqbool Siddiqui in his reaction to the special court’s verdict.
He demanded that Gen Musharraf, who he said was very ill, be given an opportunity to defend his case.
Also, the Mustafa Kamal-led Pak Sarzameen Party rejected the special court verdict, saying “legal and constitutional obligations had not been met in the case against Gen Musharraf.”
Published in Dawn, December 18th, 2019

 

[Fasbre2]

This is the SAME crazy Taliban Khan who wanted to bring in and PERMANENTALLY settle 15,000-30,000 Afghan talibans in one go and more to come later. The military establishment told him how terrible of an idea that was. But since it would play well for his "greater Pashtunistan" strategy, this traitor was hell bent on it. Glad he's gone and DONE! He should be hung for his anti-Pakistan activities.

And Nawaz sharifs family are good news… loser!!.. supporting pervert porh makers…

 

[ghazi52]

,.,.,.
Bajwa's new film "Mera yakhan Karo" flopped in two days, Imran Khan's film "Main Anku Rilaon Ga" still reigns at the box office .....

 

[CivilianSupremacy]

Taliban Khan blaming anyone but himself for rise of TTP is hilarious. He literally justify any crime taliban do, be it women education or suicide bombings. Which is norm for KP PTI politicians, only ANP showed resistance.

Taliban is a hard reality. The earlier regime of Afghanistan (Ashraf Ghani / Amrullah Saleh) regime was purely anti-Pakistani and 100% pro-indian. They use to spew venom against Pakistan in every forum. Plus they had allowed RAW to openly operate.

So in this scenario, what option we really had ? If you think Pak should go against Taliban and make them our complete enemy then it would be very unwise to do so.

We need to handle this situation very carefully. We need to maintain balanced relations with Talibs at the same time keep assassinating top TTP leadership. The ISI has to become a REAL intel security agency and focus 100% on it. Only intelligence agency can infiltrate, locate and find out the TTP leadership.