What's new

what Triggers American Invasion of Sovereign States

Irfan Baloch

SENIOR MODERATOR
Joined
Apr 12, 2009
Messages
20,975
Reaction score
214
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
check this video out

Sadam was attacked
Qadafi was attacked

both reasons was that they were planning to replace Dollar with Euro or other Non Dollar Currency as a foreign excgange


just saying. this decision of Pakistan will put Pakistan on US cross hairs more than question of Haqqani network etc.
 
. .
Do they need a reason?

The US President boasts of nuclear war and carries out missile strikes like a schoolboy playing a video game.

In fact the schoolboy playing a video game probably takes more time to consider the implications of his actions before taking out a virtual game character than the USA does before taking out actual people on foreign soil, they drop a bomb every few minutes somewhere in the world.

In the time it took you to read this message, the USA dropped another bomb on someone's head out there, somewhere in the world.

breen_trump_nuke.jpg
 
. .
check this video out

Sadam was attacked
Qadafi was attacked

both reasons was that they were planning to replace Dollar with Euro or other Non Dollar Currency as a foreign excgange


just saying. this decision of Pakistan will put Pakistan on US cross hairs more than question of Haqqani network etc.
Pakistan cannot be invaded inshallah. If it was readable it would have been done by now.
 
. .
check this video out

Sadam was attacked
Qadafi was attacked

both reasons was that they were planning to replace Dollar with Euro or other Non Dollar Currency as a foreign excgange


just saying. this decision of Pakistan will put Pakistan on US cross hairs more than question of Haqqani network etc.

Apparently RT doesn't follow the yearly Iranian announcement about dumping the dollar.

2007 Iran stops selling oil in U.S. dollars -report| Reuters

2008 Iran Ends Oil Transactions In U.S. Dollars - CBS News

2012 Iran presses ahead with dollar attack - Telegraph

2013 Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis: Iran Removes Euro and Dollar From Trade Exchanges; More Symptoms of Iranian Hyperinflation



Jan 2015 Iran dumps U.S. dollar in favor of Chinese, Russian currencies

Feb 2016 https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/iran-dumps-dollar-in-foreign-oil-sales.420962/

Feb 2017 https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-02/iran-just-officially-ditched-dollar
oh and don't forget this big one..from 2006
Iran’s euro-denominated oil bourse to open in March: US Dollar Crisis on the Horizon | Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization

I guess we should have invaded them back in 2006 with the oil bourse that supposedly would kill the dollar. We never got around to it. Same with their other yearly announcements. So far after 12 years of "killing the dollar" why is this time more special?

Screen Shot 2018-04-22 at 9.10.17 PM.jpg

keep waving the sign Iran


http://www.pewglobal.org/2018/02/28/global-migrant-stocks/?country=IR&
In 2017, 1,170,000 people born in Iran were living in other countries.
Screen Shot 2018-04-22 at 9.15.24 PM.jpg

Interesting the US is the destination of 1/3 of the people who have fled Iran.
 
Last edited:
.
These wars are more about geopolitics. Oil, resources, and currency power is just various aspects of geopolitics. The underlying motivation for these wars are holistic.

Threat to Israel
For some in Congress, Israel is also a religious issue. It is the modern crusade.

Pakistan cannot be invaded inshallah. If it was readable it would have been done by now.
That is complacency, there are many ways to destabilise, weaken, and destroy a nation. Overt solutions like conventional invasions of a decent adversary is too costly.

When it really comes to it in a major war with a powerful and technologically advanced foe, your banking system would be shut down or reset, electrical grid disabled, industries slows (or stops), internet/communications shut down/isolated, guidance systems won't work, etc the list goes on. Now your pumps and electrical equipment won't work, you will have to depend on using generators that will be less efficient and consume large amounts of fuel. Your strategic capabilities can be disabled remotely if you don't fully protect your hardware and software, which is difficult to do. The military communications would be jammed and tapped.

A electronic strike is remote and who do you retaliate against when you are not sure who the perpetrator is? Even if you do what if they don't admit to it, what do you do then?

Realistically in a real war, only China and Russia stands a chance against America. Most people don't realise the gap and the less obvious tools of war. Troops are the last item to be employed if used at all. Yes, if there is a ground invasion of Pakistan, America would be bogged down and likely lose the war but in a realistic war, remote tactics would be used. In hybrid war, you can't even have a clear cut enemy to retaliate against with your conventional forces. This will sap national resources and remove surplus from development and funds for upgrading the armed forces. There is a reason why nations don't go too out of line with America.

America and Israel disabled and destroyed Iran's nuclear centrifuges even when it was a physically isolated system. It was isolated from the internet and in physically protected facility but they still managed to embed a virus into the system that caused the centrifuges to spin out of control and destroy itself. The virus was embedded into an engineer's laptop during repairs. A war with America goes beyond just tanks, planes, and troops. There is a reason why China invested hundreds of billions into more secure communications technologies, military IC, cyber-warfare, assassins mace weapons, and spent relatively little on individual combat equipment. Most nations cannot survive the conflict level escalation, those that can survive a conventional war will have a hard time dealing with the invisible operation of cyberwarfare. They can survive but severely weakened, this can invite a series of events.

I don't mean to sound so cynical.
 
Last edited:
.
check this video out

Sadam was attacked
Qadafi was attacked

both reasons was that they were planning to replace Dollar with Euro or other Non Dollar Currency as a foreign excgange


just saying. this decision of Pakistan will put Pakistan on US cross hairs more than question of Haqqani network etc.
America is the status quo power and it will do every thing to maintain the status quo. One of the advantages of having dollar as main trading currency is it helps US control finances. Right from financing war to public spending it is pretty easy, print extra money or sell bonds. Now why would any country want to lose that advantage?

Collapse of soviet union has simply given US the monopoly over the world. We need a multi-polar world for all the countries to have a fair chance.
 
.
America is the status quo power and it will do every thing to maintain the status quo. One of the advantages of having dollar as main trading currency is it helps US control finances. Right from financing war to public spending it is pretty easy, print extra money or sell bonds. Now why would any country want to lose that advantage?

Collapse of soviet union has simply given US the monopoly over the world. We need a multi-polar world for all the countries to have a fair chance.
It is fast turning into a multipolar world.
 
.
World is chaning , law of finance is don't put all your eggs in 1 basket

So makes no sense for World to trade in 1 currency specially if it under debt of 20 Trillion dollars



Lot of other free options

a) Gold
b) Dollar / Chinese Yuan / Russian Ruble / UK pound / Oil futures / Silver
 
.
World is chaning , law of finance is don't put all your eggs in 1 basket

So makes no sense for World to trade in 1 currency specially if it under debt of 20 Trillion dollars



Lot of other free options

a) Gold
b) Dollar / Chinese Yuan / Russian Ruble / UK pound / Oil futures / Silver
c) good ol' fashioned barter system... I'll send ya N million tons of wheat, you send me N million gallons on oil.:enjoy:
 
.
c) good ol' fashioned barter system... I'll send ya N million tons of wheat, you send me N million gallons on oil.:enjoy:
While such a system is primitive, it could reduce corruption for developing nations. Instead of providing opportunities for siphoning, real goods are promised and exchanged. Ex. 1 unit of oil for 1 unit of iron ore. Instead of 1 unit of oil for X dollars, which could lead to corruption were 30% of the dollars are misused and only get 70% of the utility with barter. In the end you get 70% of the iron ore compared to direct barter. Such a system can be price stable but one side might be unhappy if market prices changes in their favour.
 
.
check this video out

Sadam was attacked
Qadafi was attacked

both reasons was that they were planning to replace Dollar with Euro or other Non Dollar Currency as a foreign excgange


just saying. this decision of Pakistan will put Pakistan on US cross hairs more than question of Haqqani network etc.
With China besides Pakistan, they are given protection. US cant do anything. Saddam and Libya do not have such luxury.
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom