What's new

What is the crime of these 7 and 8 years old Palestinian boys

. . .
May be they will be redeemed for their pain in the afterlife!!!
 
Last edited:
.
Subhan Allah they were only trying to take them away without any reason.
And when men gathered on the scene.
IDF men suddenly lost their pomp.
This shows Israel(is) by themselves are weak and cowards.

I can say with certainty I have seen such cowardice in other videos as well.

Some Hardline jews even refuse military service like they did when Moses (as) asked them to march with him to a city.
Latest video from Palestine.

Latest video from Palestine.

 
. .
I don't think a 7 year old boy has enough energy to throw a stone at an armed soldier.
 
.
Dont under-estimate these creatures. They are master of deception search up operation talpiot.
Dont be surprised if they start to come in large numbers on here pdf to troll or worser.
 
.
There should be their own reasons to be cautious if not afraid. After all it's better safe than sorry about it later, whiles the presence of Child soldiers across middle east is a reality (documented and photographed) multiple times. :(

CwknEihXEAAcjGN.jpg
 
.
There should be their own reasons to be cautious if not afraid. After all it's better safe than sorry about it later, whiles the presence of Child soldiers across middle east is a reality (documented and photographed) multiple times. :(

CwknEihXEAAcjGN.jpg
Tom when the British ruled India not only your kids but your adults just laid down and worshipedvthe white man. Its not the Muslim way. India is free because the Muslims of India fought. Hindus were irrelevant
 
. .
Tom when the British ruled India not only your kids but your adults just laid down and worshipedvthe white man. Its not the Muslim way. India is free because the Muslims of India fought. Hindus were irrelevant

This thread is neither about India nor the British. Why can't you at-least for once comment on topic ?????

Still, since you have started this off-topic discussion. Let me remind you something about History.

Do you know the reason why British were able to set a firm foot on Indian soil in the first place ??? It was the Battle of Plassey, which changed the future. And look who betrayed the Nawab and their own country men, they were not Christians or Hindus. His name is "Mir Jafar Ali Khan" a Muslim, while a Hindu commander "Mir Madan Mohan Lal" (a Hindu) Embraced martyrdom fighting for his kind and countrymen.

The same happened with the sultan of Mysore, Tipu. It was his commander Mir Sadiq, again a Muslim who betrayed his king and countrymen, while Hindu kings like Kerala Varma Pazhassi Raja from my sate of Kerala, died for interdependence as an ally of Tipu. It was another crucial war which turned the fate of Indian independence movement.

Moreover, by the time Britishers made a solid grip on Indian, the Mughal's had already become nothing more than the Governors of Delhi are few surrounding areas, because the Hindu Maratha's and Shiks were very a force to reckon with by that time.

So what the above show's the Hindu's, Christian's and Sikhs may be irrelevant (as per you), but never popular traitors of the king and the countrymen unlike few of your Muslim companions like Jafar and Sadiq. :p:

And both FYI, India, Pakistan and our subcontinent became free, because it became too costly for post Word War -II Britain to maintain overseas territories and labor party came into power in England. If not for the two world wars, the colonialism would have very well existed into this 21st century as well.

Now I challenge you to prove me wrong with facts if you can, not just with mere speculation with if's, but's and will's. :p:
 
Last edited:
.
This thread is neither about India nor the British. Why can't you at-least for once comment on topic ?????

Still, since you have started this off-topic discussion. Let me remind you something about History.

Do you know the reason why British were able to set a firm foot on Indian soil in the first place ??? It was the Battle of Plassey, which changed the future. And look who betrayed the Nawab and their own country men, they were not Christians or Hindus. His name is "Mir Jafar Ali Khan" a Muslim, while a Hindu commander "Mir Madan Mohan Lal" (a Hindu) Embraced martyrdom fighting for his kind and countrymen.

The same happened with the sultan of Mysore, Tipu. It was his commander Mir Sadiq, again a Muslim who betrayed his king and countrymen, while Hindu kings like Kerala Varma Pazhassi Raja from my sate of Kerala, died for interdependence as an ally of Tipu. It was another crucial war which turned the fate of Indian independence movement.

Moreover, by the time Britishers made a solid grip on Indian, the Mughal's had already become nothing more than the Governors of Delhi are few surrounding areas, because the Hindu Maratha's and Shiks were very a force to reckon with by that time.

So what the above show's the Hindu's, Christian's and Sikhs may be irrelevant (as per you), but never popular traitors of the king and the countrymen unlike few of your Muslim companions like Jafar and Sadiq. :p:

And both FYI, India, Pakistan and our subcontinent became free, because it became too costly for post Word War -II Britain to maintain overseas territories and labor party came into power in England. If not for the two world wars, the colonialism would
have very well existed into this 21st century as well. Now prove me wrong with facts if you can, not just with mere speculation with if's, but's and will's. :p:

you think I will read this waffle?
 
.
you think I will read this waffle?

I'm damn sure you won't. Because you fear to look at the mirror when shown. Else you would have replied back logically rather than mere speculations or wishes. :p:
 
.
It's quite evident who is getting personal being childish and behaving like a kid here, when one don't have anything substantial to discuss rather than claims and speculations. Now please excuse me, I'm interested in only civil discussions, not personal. :p:
Ok I am just going ignore you. Have a good day
 
.
Back
Top Bottom