What's new

What happened to Kaveri engine?

. . . .
16 billion allocated but how much is used and since when? we have a tvc engine now, you can say we copied, stole, beg or borrow. WE DID IT....you still suck after all these spoonfeeding from virtually every country from Russians to the West.:rofl::rofl::rofl:

Our philosophy is different. We want exactly specific and tailored product for us. Look how we created Tejas and how you copied all Russian planes and failed. Inspite of making hundreds of planes and so called fifth generation plane, you are still buying fourth generation planes from Russia.
 
.
Yup, did we say our programs were fully indigenous and go shouting about it? Only Indians do such things, shout and boast right supapowan 2012? Even after so much spoon feeding, you produce crappy things.:rofl::rofl::rofl:
.
oh the crappy things you say , can you justify your statement or you work for xinhua news agency or perhaps global times ? you and your thought process is capped and bottled by your rouge government so i understand your state of mind and state of being . first feed your self then point fingers on bharat , everything which is shown on the media is not reality for china , the real ugly truth is hidden as always . dont you worry , the beggar mao ze dong is dead and nixon is also not there , trump has started the game and will end it too . till then get busy with propaganda on the websites and tv channels of chinese so called might which never was , sri lanka and the likes would disagreee with my statements though which are under the influential might of chinese clout now .
 
.
This looks like Kabari not kevari

Judging by that low key attempt to troll, you are really only saying so coz you aren't aware of how turbofan engines look on test benches.

But then again, pakistan is nowhere near even thinking of developing a turbofan so I guess pakistanis can be forgiven for that bit of slight.
 
.
.
Judging by that low key attempt to troll, you are really only saying so coz you aren't aware of how turbofan engines look on test benches.

But then again, pakistan is nowhere near even thinking of developing a turbofan so I guess pakistanis can be forgiven for that bit of slight.

And you do because in Indian making jet engine is a home industry and every Indian makes it like a toy so obviously you people are so familiar with turbojets on Test benches.
 
.
Judging by that low key attempt to troll, you are really only saying so coz you aren't aware of how turbofan engines look on test benches.

But then again, pakistan is nowhere near even thinking of developing a turbofan so I guess pakistanis can be forgiven for that bit of slight.
LOL we have develop Babur where you are deciding that when to cancel your nirbhay cruise missile project after 4 successful failures and passing all deadlines so you are a fine one to talk LOL.The only reason why we aren't able to develop engine is of funds otherwise our NESCOM is more than capable to build an engine.
 
.
LOL we have develop Babur where you are deciding that when to cancel your nirbhay cruise missile project after 4 successful failures and passing all deadlines so you are a fine one to talk LOL.The only reason why we aren't able to develop engine is of funds otherwise our NESCOM is more than capable to build an engine.
Comparing a cruise missile with a fighter jet engine is actually wrong.

Even RC plane folks make jet engines :

This does not mean they are anywhere near making a fighter jet engine.
 
.
And you do because in Indian making jet engine is a home industry and every Indian makes it like a toy so obviously you people are so familiar with turbojets on Test benches.

India is the only country to try to build a jet engine without a proper wind tunnel. You will see them rebuking me. But it’s important to track the dates.
 
.
India is the only country to try to build a jet engine without a proper wind tunnel. You will see them rebuking me. But it’s important to track the dates.

that is because they didnt make crap, its made in Russia and Russia will never give them a working engine
 
. .
LOL we have develop Babur where you are deciding that when to cancel your nirbhay cruise missile project after 4 successful failures and passing all deadlines so you are a fine one to talk LOL.The only reason why we aren't able to develop engine is of funds otherwise our NESCOM is more than capable to build an engine.

Your whole riposte is a red herring.
As if "making" a cruise missile automatically makes pakistan capable of developing turbofans.

Turbofans are a whole another beast, more countries can make nukes than turbofans.
Pakistan is yet to even R&D a small turbofan forget about a fighter aircraft sized powerplant.


As for Nirbhay, who told you it's going to be canceled? We tested a new indigenous turbofan engine for the same in this year alone.
IMG_20181224_142537.png



Nirbhay's initial failures are completely normal, that's how cruise missile R&D works.
If you look at Tomahawk tests before induction; they took almost a decade and had 30 something failures before they deemed it induction worthy.

Hell, the newer tactical Tomahawk immediately post the Block IIIs(being developed around 2002-2005)which are more similar to Nirbhay with its GPS guidance and other advanced avionics, had similar failures with 3 straight failures in a row in its initial testing alone.

While pakistan suddenly claims it has conducted successful tests of Babur supposedly based on the Tomahawk which itself was going through failures during the same time period, and inducted the Babur after a few tests.

Yeah right, the market leaders and pioneers of cruise missile tech take decades and after countless failures are able to induct their LACM, whereas pakistanis allegedly reverse engineer the same system(Tomahawk, btw occasionally fails even now post induction) and induct theirs after a handful of tests and zero failures?

I have said this before here in pdf, cruise missiles are entirely very complicated systems that are virtually autonomous planes almost as close to RPA's as to actual missiles; and to say that pak achieved something at a fraction of the cost, time and testing numbers than what it took the US, then your are just fooling yourself.

At best pakistan integrates while a 3rd party does most of the work, hence no development of Babur ever took place in pakistan and in all probability "Babur" is a downgraded version of either the chinese YJ-18 or the CJ-10.

Babur copy .jpg
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom