Mamluk
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2016
- Messages
- 1,746
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
Not true. Atheism only requires a concept of God, which can be defined abstractly without reference to any particular religion. It certainly doesn’t require the existence of any religious believers.
No stupid.
There is no universal definition of God written in a timeless object. A definition of God requires (1) form, and (2) powers.
I could define my God as the Sun (form) which then I can claim has created humans and determines their destiny (powers). Only then you can be a Mamluk's-Sun-God-denying-atheist and prove me wrong.
There is an implicit understanding that most atheists are Abrahamic-God-denying-atheist.
LOL most people on earth have better things to do than to waste time thinking about religion. That's why some countries are developed while others are in stone age.
I am irreligious so that's a rather failed attempt to offend me. Anyways I do not believe athesim can bring any change to countries that are backwater $hit. Are you suggesting Congo or Uganda could be next Singapore or Switzerland if they adopted atheism?
Development has more to do with IQ than anything.
LOL you just insulted (to the core) a vital ally! And you'd be surprised about how many people find religion somewhat to very important in their lives..
Except extremists, I have found religious people to be more trustworthy and reliable than you atheists. So I don't think it's a bad thing that so many find it important to their lives. I would trust a religious Christian or Muslim over you any day.
Last edited: