What's new

"We're Not In Beijing" - Italian Newspaper Slams Chinese Embassy For Trying To Intimidate Reporter

Get Ya Wig Split

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Feb 22, 2017
Messages
2,585
Reaction score
-2
Country
United States
Location
United States
"We're Not In Beijing" - Italian Newspaper Slams Chinese Embassy For Trying To Intimidate Reporter

Now that Italy has consummated its new long-term economic relationship with China, observers across the west are on the lookout for signs that China's "neocolonial project" won't focus simply on ports and other infrastructure projects - but might involve a bit of cultural imperialism as well.

In Italy, apprehensiveness about joining "One Belt, One Road" hasn't been limited to the political opposition - even Deputy PM Matteo Salvini has expressed some reservations. But nowhere has the opposition been as fierce as certain corners of the Italian media, particularly the conservative Il Foglio newspaper, which has a long record of Sino skepticism and distrust.

Still, readers were probably shocked to read a piece published over the weekend recounting a particularly inappropriate encounter between one of the paper's Asia correspondents, Giulia Pompili, and a spokesman for Beijing's embassy in Rome.

In an editorial titled "Non Siamo a Pechino" - "We're Not In Beijing" - the paper told the story of a brief but ominous encounter between Pompili and Chinese embassy spokesman Yang Han. Shortly before the beginning of Friday's ceremony with President Xi and Italian President Sergio Mattarella, Pompili had arrived with other members of the press corps at the Quirinal Palace in Rome, an official residence of the Italian president, where the press conference was to be held.



After a member of the Quirinal's staff introduced Pompili, Yang approached her for an encounter that the paper described as "not exactly friendly." In front of other journalists, Yang demanded that Pompili stop writing critical pieces about China.

When Pompili, who said she had never met Yang before Friday, replied that it was her job to write critically about China, Yang offered a sinister response: "Anyway, I know who you are."

In the editorial, the paper acknowledged that it had a very clear position on China's operations in the west - one that is dramatically different from the position of the Italian government. And despite this latest threat, it has no plans to change its coverage, because "Italy isn't China...and The Quirinal isn't the Palace of the Forbidden City". The Italian press "has the full right to express ideas and criticisms."

Even before the deal was signed, Italy's leaders had been trying to reassure Washington and Brussels that Italy is "still an ally," per CNBC.

"We are maximizing all precautionary measures, and I want to tell the U.S., and I will tell them as well in next week’s visit, that they are our allies, and that we understand their concerns. But the contents of the MOU (memorandum of understanding) that we are signing tomorrow contains nothing for them to worry about, nothing relating to 5G or any agreement on strategic telecommunications," Di Maio told CNBC’s Joumanna Bercetche on Friday just before the signing.

And though this incident could be a one-off, one can't help but wonder how the Italian leadership will handle Beijing's widely acknowledged intolerance for dissent.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019...ms-chinese-embassy-trying-intimidate-reporter

Communist China smh
 
. .
strawman argument. what Yang said should not be interpretted as 'we know who you are' but as 'we know WHAT you are' to refer his longtime being critical about China. it is a typical strawman argument to first misrepresent the opponent's view and then attack this falsified position. real argument should follow the principle of charity but politically motivated people rarely do.
 
.
strawman argument. what Yang said should not be interpretted as 'we know who you are' but as 'we know WHAT you are' to refer his longtime being critical about China. it is a typical strawman argument to first misrepresent the opponent's view and then attack this falsified position. real argument should follow the principle of charity but politically motivated people rarely do.
In contrast, Chinese diplomats (or any diplomats) shouldn't pull a stunt like this. It'll only tarnish their image (and China's).
Another one I heard, Chinese diplomats tried to barge in to APEC host office to influence the communique that seem critical of China.
 
.
In contrast, Chinese diplomats (or any diplomats) shouldn't pull a stunt like this. It'll only tarnish their image (and China's).
Another one I heard, Chinese diplomats tried to barge in to APEC host office to influence the communique that seem critical of China.
few people are proficient in foreign culture. diplomats are not different. though they should be better trained, it is always easy to misquote and misinterpret their speech and behaviors by their opponents, as they are culturally vulnerable than the natives. the only defense to such attacks is reasoning. just read the report and ask yourself: does it form a sound argument or does it play your emotion?
 
.
Another quotemining "report" from another yellow press paper where the only things they act offended about are just the miss-"reporters" own words and other shit that never happend?

Into the trash it goes.
 
.
refer his longtime being critical about China.

Giulia Pompili

It's "Julia" in English. It's some lady.

Edit:
Screen Shot 2019-03-24 at 9.16.08 PM.jpg

Giulia Pompili
 
.
few people are proficient in foreign culture. diplomats are not different. though they should be better trained, it is always easy to misquote and misinterpret their speech and behaviors by their opponents, as they are culturally vulnerable than the natives. the only defense to such attacks is reasoning. just read the report and ask yourself: does it form a sound argument or does it play your emotion?
Maybe they misinterpreted what he said. Then again his comments seem a little off for a diplomat. If they find arrogance in the comments, it is justified. From what I understand, this whole thing should've been avoided and the diplomat should not have approached the journalist with such a request. This simply doesn't happen anywhere in the world.
 
.
If they find arrogance in the comments, it is justified.
It is not justified. Otherwise, it is justified for every snowflake to claim that the whole world has been unjust to him. Justification should be upon facts, not on emotion, particularly the faked emotion/sensitivity.
 
.
whole world has been unjust to him.
Apply your own logic to China.
That's the same issue China is raising here. The news papers are unjust. If they have nothing to worry, then why trouble the media?
 
.
Apply your own logic to China.
That's the same issue China is raising here. The news papers are unjust. If they have nothing to worry, then why trouble the media?
China doesn't trouble the media. It is the media that troubles China.
 
.
China doesn't trouble the media. It is the media that troubles China.
Regarding the highlighted -- tough shit.

That is the price China has to pay for being in a world that have conflicting opinions.
 
.
Regarding the highlighted -- tough shit.

That is the price China has to pay for being in a world that have conflicting opinions.
What about the price the other conflicting side pays?
 
.
LMAO "Italy isn't China...and The Quirinal isn't the Palace of the Forbidden City", Chinese are neither Italian, learn to show respect if you want respect in return, you can bullshit your own kind but not trying to mess with us , I only witsh Wand Yi was there, we don't give a rat a$$ if the place is Quirinal.

 
.
Regarding the highlighted -- tough shit.

That is the price China has to pay for being in a world that have conflicting opinions.
China's rise cannot be achieved without conflicting opinion.

The encounter between Pompili and Chinese embassy spokesman probably has nothing to do with conflicting opinion.
More like prejudice and hatred.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom