We learned nothing from the fall of Dhaka, says Nawaz

[Ryuzaki]

Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz (PMLN) president Nawaz Sharif today warned the nation saying we learned nothing from the fall of Dhaka which led to Pakistan regressing behind all independent countries around us.



He was addressing party’s General Council meeting at Convention Center in Islamabad.

"Those who violated constitutional oath remained sadiq and ameen," ousted PM Nawaz deplored.

"The people will decide through their vote [in general elections of 2018] who is qualified and who is unqualified," he said.

While paying tribute to lawmakers who passed Electoral Reforms Bill 2017, Sharif said that he is giving this black law back to former military ruler General (r) Pervez Musharraf today who introduced it to curtail his entrance in politics.

“I served nation cordially”, he said while adding that, “I was ousted merely on basis of Iqama as no wrongdoing was found in Panamagate”.

Nawaz stated that he was ousted over not receiving salary from his son.

He apprised attendants that 12 questions posed during lawyers’ convention in Lahore remained unanswered.

He said no action committed during dictatorial rule was taken notice of under Article 184 (3) of the constitution. The petitions for Sharif s disqualification were heard under Article 184(3).

"I ask, is ehtasaab [accountability] for Nawaz Sharif only?" questioned Nawaz.

http://nation.com.pk/national/03-Oct-2017/we-learned-nothing-from-the-fall-of-dhaka-says-nawaz

 

[kris]

He got a point

 

[El Sidd]

Give Dhaka back.

We want to learn something

 

[gangsta_rap]

Did you learn anything from Panama? Nahal shaks and his goons are on 'barking mode' against the army. They won't receive the political martyrdom that they want so much

 

[Ryuzaki]

Nawaz Sharif made similar statement in August.Is he trying to signal something?

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/form...learning-no-lesson-from-fall-of-dhaka.512288/

 

[Mitho1980]

Yup the signal is for the same people who led to fall of Dhaka. Wait is he signaling himself........

 

[H!TchHiker]

Nawaz Sharif made similar statement in August.Is he trying to signal something?

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/form...learning-no-lesson-from-fall-of-dhaka.512288/

Yes he will soon lead an arm insurgency...

 

[The Sandman]

Someone from his party (if anyone of them have balls) should tell this ignorant POS that it was him who was against the removal of 62/63 and it was his political father zia who introduced it he was disqualified because he failed to clear his name and declare his earnings idiot. I don't know why he's trying to take panga with army they've nothing to do with his disqualification this time they really stayed out of it completely court made the JIT. There will be no dhaka this time you a hole you had 1.5 years to prove yourself innocent but you failed terribly at it even lied in parliament which was a slap on the faces of his voters. Keep barking army ain't gonna make you a political martyr that you're craving for.

 

[RowdyRathore]

Give Dhaka back.

We want to learn something

Why would you need a Dhaka when you've got Baluchistan?

 

[El Sidd]

Why would you need a Dhaka when you've got Baluchistan?

Because of the Rohingya genocide crisis

 

[HAIDER]

Give Dhaka back.

We want to learn something

Send this corrupt to Dhaka. But its god damn slaves around him. This Kashmiri boy Nawaz is the most untrustable person .

 

[El Sidd]

Send this corrupt to Dhaka. But its god damn slaves around him. This Kashmiri boy Nawaz is the most untrustable person .

He is probably gonna end up as our next President if he decides to pull an Erdogan on us.

The man's a genius. A visionary.

Kashmiris are astute businessman.

General alladeen wrote this

 

[Solomon2]

"Those who violated constitutional oath remained sadiq and ameen," ousted PM Nawaz deplored.

Is Nawaz referring to Pakistan's politicians or to the Pakistani Army? For they had different - even clashing - constitutional oaths at the time.

 

[313ghazi]

Actually he is speaking the truth. Mujeeb won by majority and power should have been given to him. Bhutto wasn't responsible he was a bloody foreign minister he had no powers. Yahya Khan(military dictator) was the president he was responsible for the separation and creation of bangladesh. To this day Hamoodur Rahman Commission report is classified and hidden. We lost Bangladesh becuase of the army not because of the politicians.

No it's not - it's right here. http://img.dunyanews.tv/images/docss/hamoodur_rahman_commission_report.pdf you can google for copies in Urdu too if you like.


----

Ganja is right, we didn't learn from 1971, we should have shot dead the heads of the traitors then and we should do it now too. A few hundred dead politicians ends a revolt a lot quicker than a civil war does.

 

[Gurjot.S]

Is Nawaz referring to Pakistan's politicians or to the Pakistani Army? For they had different - even clashing - constitutional oaths at the time.

Army of course.