What's new

We have traitor in our military

gagaga

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
270
Reaction score
0
a 2010-01-09 cable from US Secretary of State, to 4 US embassies, about our 2010 January midcourse missile interception test, our test conduct at 2010-01-11, find something amazing.

Cable Viewer

¶1. (S//NF) THIS IS AN ACTION REQUEST. Embassies Canberra,
London, Ottawa, and Wellington are instructed to deliver the
talking points (and hand over as a U.S. Non-Paper) in
paragraph 3 to appropriate Host Nation foreign and defense
policy officials as soon as possible on Monday, January 11,
2010, given that the intercept flight-test is expected
imminently
. Embassies are requested to provide confirmation
of delivery and any immediate responses.

¶2. (S) BACKGROUND: The U.S. Intelligence Community assesses
that China may conduct an intercept flight-test using an
SC-19 missile from the Korla Missile Test Complex against a
CSS-X-11 medium-range ballistic missile launched from the
Shuangchengzi Space and Missile Center in the next several
days.
An SC-19 was used previously as the payload booster
for the January 11, 2007 direct-ascent anti-satellite
(DA-ASAT) intercept of the Chinese FY-1C weather satellite.
Previous SC-19 DA-ASAT flight-tests were conducted in 2005
and 2006. The United States does not expect China to provide
any prior notification of its imminent intercept flight-test,
post-test announcement, nor do we expect any post-event
explanation without China being asked or questioned in a
demarche.

they knew everything BEFORE the test was conducted.

-- Since the national security imperative is not to
jeopardize sensitive intelligence "sources and methods," as
well as enable collection on this event, Washington has
decided not to demarche Beijing prior to this expected
flight-test.
Furthermore, it is our assessment that any
demarche transmitted prior to the launch event will not
dissuade China from conducting the SC-19 flight-test.

-- U.S. diplomatic and public diplomacy strategies will be
shaped by the observables of the event, China's
diplomatic/public explanations (if any), and upon our
post-test analysis of risks to "sources and methods."

hmmm... what kind of "sources and methods" is that?


origin post

лªÉç¿ìѶ£ºÖйú11ÈÕÔÚ¾³ÄÚ½øÐÐÁËÒ»´Î½»ùÖжη´µ¼À¹½Ø¼¼ÊõÊÔÑ飬ÊÔÑé´ïµ½ÁËÔ¤ÆÚÄ¿µÄ - º½¿Õº½Ìì×ÛºÏÉçÇø!

462 floor
 
. .
Its more likely that the US has crack China's top secret codes...
 
.
hmm..nice post gagagagagaga
yes his post are relly unique & way ahead from other members in this forum.:enjoy:
becoz u dont need to read it complete to understand it just a glimpse of that thread would tell u everything:rofl:
i am a big fan of his name :D
 
. . .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom