What's new

Was india a country before it was ruled by the British?

Come on dear Bharatis, just admit it

'Indians' are essentially Pakistanis(but never the other way round) because Indo-Aryans spread out from the Indus valley in the west to almightly-ly conquer the rest of 'India' all the way to the east where the Ganga basin is.
why don't u mind ur own fkin business. there are no indo-aryans in south india. they are indigineous dravidians
 
. .
How did they arrive there? Spaceship?
the only truely indigenous people of this country are dravidians of south india. they are related to the australoids and aborigines of Australia. go read up about their origins
 
.
the only truely indigenous people of this country are dravidians of south india. they are related to the australoids and aborigines of Australia. go read up about their origins


Again, how did they arrive there? Mythical spaceship?
 
.
Indus River flows through entire length of Pakistan along a north south axis discharging into Arabian Sea. The source is in China. Indus is to Pakistan exactly like nile is to Egypt. Pakistan's capital Islamabad is only 20 miles east of Indus and over 80% of population of Pakistan lives adjacent to the Indus River.


indusriver1.gif



1207px-Indus_flooding_2010_en.svg.png



map-of-the-indus-basin-source-us-senate-report.jpg



More here > https://defence.pk/threads/indus-basin-pakistan.372053/

But since 'hind' comes from 'sindhu' you should give the territories that Indus flows through to us :)
 
.
Again, how did they arrive there? Mythical spaceship?
south indian landmass was joined with australian landmass at one point of time before they got separated I don't know when go contact uncle google.
 
.
why don't u mind ur own fkin business. there are no indo-aryans in south india. they are indigineous dravidians

thanks u just reaffirmed the main point here yourself- India was never a united country-, especially when the negroid and australoid dravidic south were different from the indo-aryans of the north.

Hence, the British created 'India' to bind these different entities together as the British Raj
 
.
Looking at last 1,000 years of history more like you Ganga's will be under our rule again for umpteenth time ..
You never ruled anything. West Indians (aka 'Pakistanis') have no experience in ruling. Sikhs and Marathas will do that for you. :) In time.
 
.
thanks u just reaffirmed the main point here yourself- India was never a united country-, especially when the negroid and australoid dravidic south were different from the indo-aryans of the north.

Hence, the British created 'India' to bind these different entities together as the British Raj
Provinces comprising India all have hindu ie polytheist majority. Its a country of majority polytheists. I am not hindu so can't comment further on this. all i know is that they decided to form a union superceding ethnic affiliations. their choice
 
.
You never ruled anything. West Indians (aka 'Pakistanis') have no experience in ruling. Sikhs and Marathas will do that for you. :) In time.

Both West and East 'Indians' (Western/Eastern Sindhus) are Pakistanis. ;)

You are just genetically diluted Onge people with adopted identities - like "Latin" Americans.
 
. .
'Pakistanis' are people of Bharatvarsha with Islam as their faith and firm belief that Muslims and non Muslims can't live together.

Bharatvarsha is a myth.

Pakistanis are people of Punjab, Afghania, Kashmir, Sindh (India!) and Balochistan.

It's just an acronym. We didn't borrow our name from another country's province/river.
 
.
Bharatvarsha is a myth.

Pakistanis are people of Punjab, Afghania, Kashmir, Sindh (India!) and Balochistan.

It's just an acronym. We didn't borrow our name from another country's province/river.
:omghaha:

Acronym? Without English, Pakistan word itself would not have come around. :D

'Pakistan' is actually a part of my nation. The partition is a one time accident that will be reversed in a few centuries. We have waited 800 years for freedom. We can wait another couple. :)
 
.
:omghaha:

'Pakistan' is actually a part of my nation.

There is no nation called India.


Europeans call a geographic region the Middle East. But to inhabitants of that region this term makes no sense.


Europeans call a geographic region India. To inhabitants of that region, India is just a bastardized term for Sindh.


Europeans create Eurocentric names for convenience - it wasn't really meant for adoption by the locals!

--
@Kaptaan @PAKISTANFOREVER This Onge thinks we are his nation! He needs a mirror! :lol:
 
.
There is no nation called India.


Europeans call a geographic region the Middle East. But to inhabitants of that region this term makes no sense.


Europeans call a geographic region India. To inhabitants of that region, India is just a bastardized term for Sindh.


Europeans create Eurocentric names for convenience - it's wasn't really meant for adoption by the locals!
Unlike you cultural orphans, we (or any civilization) looks WITHIN to understand who they are. Do the Chinese ask the English what to call themselves? Do the Japanese ask the Americans? We don't ask anyone, it is not needed. You of course will not like it - but if you stop hating us, you will cease to exist. That is the raison d'etre of your existence. :angel:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom