What's new

Visit a small lhopa village at remote China-India border

Here comes the big 5:
Chongqing
Beijing
 
Last edited:
. .
No, I just tell you some common sense, our cities go verticle, while your cities go flat, with larger population density...
Our cities are like this:
while yours are like this:

When everyone turns on their light bulb, Dharavi will be brighter than Manhattan:enjoy:
Where is Dharavi, bro?
 
. . .
Mate you are comparing apples with oranges...the previous post showed distribution of electricity...the luminosity in the satellite pic shows the density of population that is generally proportional to developed areas...you can see how much luminosity is there in Tibet or otherwise in China.....whereas your video describes electricity generation... so your comparison is not related.
First, anyone can make a picture like that, it is not verifiable. second, the overall electricity production and consumption is one of the most important indicators to show a country's overall development level.
 
.
First, anyone can make a picture like that, it is not verifiable. second, the overall electricity production and consumption is one of the most important indicators to show a country's overall development level.

So all the propaganda videos about China that you keep posting are verifiable?... Yes electricity generation is indicator of development, but that satellite pic shows the even distribution of development in India vs China where most of the development is concentrated on East side of China.
 
.
So all the propaganda videos about China that you keep posting are verifiable?... Yes electricity generation is indicator of development, but that satellite pic shows the even distribution of development in India vs China where most of the development is concentrated on East side of China.

You can hardly set up factory in desert or high mountain, this is general knowledge. I doubt really your IQ is below normal level.
 
. .
1603521397944.png

According to the night view, Australia and New Zealand are the poorest regions on earth and india among the RICHEST:

You mean those videos and picture about Chinese cities and towns are fake?
Those low IQ do not know the difference between verticle growth of Chinese cities and population density/distribution... Our 632 meter tall Shanghai tower with 433,954 sqm of floor area will be no much brighter than a slum house on the map...lol...
Useless to debate with those low IQ...
 
Last edited:
.
You mean those videos and picture about Chinese cities and towns are fake?
Not cities and villages..but showing every thing is hunky dory there, people are happy, China has some Star war type alien tech laced army who can beat anyone in the universe etc etc....all this given nothing is published out of China without Govt's nod.
 
.
Not cities and villages..but showing every thing is hunky dory there, people are happy, China has some Star war type alien tech laced army who can beat anyone in the universe etc etc....all this given nothing is published out of China without Govt's nod.
Which of my post is hunky dory, can you be more specific?
 
.
This is what India has made South Tibet to become like. Garbage dump.

To be honest with you, small towns in China looked like that in the 1990's too.
 
.
So all the propaganda videos about China that you keep posting are verifiable?... Yes electricity generation is indicator of development, but that satellite pic shows the even distribution of development in India vs China where most of the development is concentrated on East side of China.
no wander Australian follows trump's lead... what a retard
 
.
the previous post showed distribution of electricity...the luminosity in the satellite pic shows the density of population that is generally proportional to developed areas...
No it just shows an edited picture showing luminosity at an unspecified date at nighttime and asserts an outdated hypothesis/model, you likely just stumbled over in some American propaganda articles trying fool and feed idiots with denial about Chinas actual development, as some sort of fact/rule, to deny the very facts that if anything prove the hypothesis/model wrong and or obsolete.

Nevermind the usless hypothesis/model trying to link luminosity to energy usage and that to economic development on a linear scale, the picture is over 10 years old.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom