What's new

View: Don’t join hypocrites in condemning Myanmar

jetray

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 23, 2016
Messages
2,715
Reaction score
-7
Country
India
Location
India
View: Don’t join hypocrites in condemning Myanmar
ET CONTRIBUTORS|
Updated: Sep 13, 2017, 12.20 AM IST
view-dont-join-hypocrites-in-condemning-myanmar.jpg

We should not fritter away our strategic stakes in Myanmar by joining a selective, hypocritical chorus on humanitarian issues
By Kanwal Sibal

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Myanmar visit (September 5-7) was timely for consolidating bilateral ties. More so as Modi could give political comfort to the Aung San Suu Kyi government on the Rohingya issue over which she is being personally castigated internationally. Voices for restoration of sanctions on Myanmar are being heard.

We should not fritter away our strategic stakes in Myanmar by joining a selective, hypocritical chorus on humanitarian issues by those who prefer to agitate only such as are low-cost for them. The Islamic countries who condemn Myanmar should explain why Saudi Arabia’s onslaught on the Yemenis or that of Turkey on the Kurds is overlooked by them. Why is there silence on China’s treatment of Tibetans and the Uighur Muslims ? The OIC liberally condemns India on Kashmir but is inaudible over Pakistan’s promotion of terrorism in India and Afghanistan. The ease with which the perceived maltreatment of Muslims anywhere mobilises the community in distant geographies, even violently, explains why pan-Islamism makes the full integration of Muslim minorities in non-Muslim countries difficult.

Unfortunately, humanitarian issues are viewed by Islamic countries primarily through the religious prism. Myanmar may be mishandling the Rohingya issue but its complexity should not be downplayed by critics. Myanmar is strategically important for us for multiple reasons. It is contiguous with our insurgency-prone and economically underdeveloped northeast region. We need Myanmar’s cooperation to deal with insurgent groups and partner in connectivity projects that would link this land-locked region to the Bay of Bengal and beyond to ASEAN.

This would aid in developing our northeast states and contribute to their better integration with the rest of India by removing a feeling of neglect. Our Act East policy has the strategic objective of building closer ties with the economically dynamic Asian countries with which we have had intimate civilisational ties historically. The contemporary challenge is to redress the power balance in the region that is shifting towards a China fired by hegemonic ambitions. China is building north-south connectivities to link the region to the Chinese economy and through this gain political ascendancy.

India is promoting east-west connectivity projects such as the trilateral India-Myanmar-Thailand highway to be extended eventually to Vietnam. Myanmar is our gateway for such projects. China has also positioned itself very strongly in Myanmar itself, gaining access to the Bay of Bengal through its pipelines and port projects as part of its maritime silk road strategy. We have to offset China’s power in Myanmar, particularly with growing Myanmarese resistance to Beijing’s tightening embrace. The Rohingya issue should not be given the colour of a bilateral one between India and Bangladesh.

Commentary that India’s stance will damage India-Bangladesh relations as it fails to recompense the Sheikh Hasina government for its cooperation on weeding out anti-India insurgents from its soil is misguided. Bangladesh’s biggest defence partner is China, it supports the Belt and Road Initiative and wants to put its China and India ties in separate boxes. India has let the issue of 20 million plus Bangladeshi illegal migrants in India lie dormant, though the fact that 40,000 Rohingyas have moved to India should be reason for India to seriously address the porosity of our border with Bangladesh.

Astonishingly, the Rohingyas by the thousands have settled down in J&K where the Muslims fiercely oppose the settlement of Hindu refugees as a conspiracy to bring about demographic change. The Rohingya issue is thorny for us and glib talk about India’s historical vocation to accept refugees from everywhere is altogether vaporous.

(The author is a former foreign secretary)

@Levina @Nilgiri @NairSaab @ranjeet @Skull and Bones @thesolar65 @Tshering22
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rohingyas by the thousands have settled down in J&K where the Muslims fiercely oppose the settlement of Hindu refugees
Nothing against Rohingyas, but where was UN (human rights commission) when KP men were being killed and KP women were violated?

I liked India's reply to UN human rights commissioner. Lol
 
Last edited:
Nothing against Rohingyas, but where was UN (human commission) when KP men were being killed and KP women were violated?

I liked India's reply to UN human right commissioner. Lol
Who are the KP?

The Islamic countries who condemn Myanmar should explain why Saudi Arabia’s onslaught on the Yemenis or that of Turkey on the Kurds is overlooked by them
Dumb idiot author,we are not an Islamic country and we dont slaughter the Kurds,if you dont know whats going on,dont comment on it.
 
Who are the KP?
Kashmiri Pandits!

They still live like refugees in their own country-India.
No media talks about their plight and no politician speaks in their support.
KPs were killed and their houses burnt, merely to alter the demography of Kashmir.
Finally their exodus ensured a safe entry for radicalisation in the valley.
One reason why there was surge in violence in Kashmir post-1989.
 
We treat them 100 times better than you treat your own people and your own children.
By forcing them to abandon naming their child including Medina, Mohammed.

By not allowing practicing muslims in government jobs, Stopping students from fasting during holy month, government officials and party members are not allowed to fast, by not allowing growing beards that looks islamic (whatever that mean). By having heavy surveillance on them, forcing them to install special application in their mobile phones thereby tracking the movements, getting details of their calls.


By intimidating people with strong military presence in the region. Last but not least, by forcing imams to dance on street.

Hmmm. There is no such things in India.
 
Last edited:
By forcing them to abandon naming their child including Medina, Mohammed.

By not allowing practicing muslims in government jobs, by not allowing growing beards that looks islamic (whatever that mean). By having heavy survelliance on them, forcing them to install special application in their mobile phones thereby tracking the movements, getting details of their calls.

By providing strong military presence in the region. Hmmm. There is no such things in India.
By giving them good education, healthcare, housing and a wealthy life. What do you give to your own people? starvation, short life expectancy , illiteracy and malnutrition for your own children.
 
By giving them good education, healthcare, housing and a wealthy life. What do you give to your own people? starvation, short life expectancy , illiteracy and malnutrition for your own children.
That's not the point.

My project's chief have a parrot in a cage, he feeds it with good food, he says it's so expensive that at least it requires around $100 a month for food, medicine, anti bios, regular consulting of vet etc...

it's cage is somewhat big, have leather bars to sit.

But do you think that parrot is happy. Sure the freely roaming parrots don't get anything close to all these, but whom do you think leads a better life. The free one's of course. If you disagree with me, well then you only justify my thoughts about you guys.
 
That's not the point.

My project's chief have a parrot in a cage, he feeds it with good food, he says it's so expensive that at least it requires around $100 a month for food, medicine, anti bios, regular consulting of vet etc...

it's cage is somewhat big, have leather bars to sit.

But do you think that parrot is happy. Sure the freely roaming parrots don't get anything close to all these, but whom do you think leads a better life. The free one's of course. If you disagree with me, well then you only justify my thoughts about you guys.
First you are not freely roaming , cause your parrots are divided into different castes therefore they are no longer the same parrots , second your parrots are dying from starvation.
 
.... by not allowing growing beards that looks islamic (whatever that mean). By having heavy surveillance on them, forcing them to install special application in their mobile phones thereby tracking the movements, getting details of their calls.


By intimidating people with strong military presence in the region. Last but not least, by forcing imams to dance on street.

Hmmm. There is no such things in India.

Wow, that sounds terrible. Almost as terrible as having a Prime Minister who is known across the world primarily as a mass murderer of Indian Muslims?

Or butchering tens of thousands more Muslims in Kashmir? And using civilians as human shields on jeeps there? Having your security forces killing over 50+ Kashmiri protestors in a month?

And by the way, there is no beard ban in China. Go to Youtube and find a recent video taken in Xinjiang and count how many people in the video have beards.
 
Wow, that sounds terrible. Almost as terrible as having a Prime Minister who is known across the world primarily as a mass murderer of Indian Muslims?

Or butchering tens of thousands more Muslims in Kashmir? And using civilians as human shields on jeeps there? Having your security forces killing over 50+ Kashmiri protestors in a month?

:blah: That's what happen when you spend too much time in PDF.

There is no 50 killing a month or so. If there was, then there wont be any issue in Kashmir, police is following maximum restrain against stone pelters.

About the Human shield case, the army didn't shot him dead, be thankful to that. You know how stone pelters are dealt in other countries.

There are nearly 180 million Muslims in India Kashmiri muslims not even constitute 1%.

And by the way, there is no beard ban in China. Go to Youtube and find a recent video taken in Xinjiang and count how many people in the video have beards.
Don't ask me to go here and there and see this video and that video. There has been many news reports, from Arab news networks, BBC. I don't think everyone is lying or world is conspiring against China.
 
Last edited:
:blah: That's what happen when you spend too much time in PDF.

There is no 50 killing a month or so. If there was, then there wont be any issue in Kashmir, police is following maximum restrain against stone pelters.

About the Human shield case, the army didn't shot him dead, be thankful to that. You know how stone pelters are dealt in other countries.


Don't ask me to go here and there and see this video and that video. There has been many news reports, from Arab news networks, BBC. I don't think everyone is lying or world is conspiring against China.

It was the Indian author who brought in China first, we don't claim to be a saint when it comes to defending the Muslim world. And even then, banning beards (which is not true by the way) isn't exactly a murderous approach.

India is the country which has the 2nd largest population of Muslims in the world, soon to be the 1st. You can be a champion of the global Muslim cause if you wish, and good luck with that.
 
Don't ask me to go here and there and see this video and that video. There has been many news reports, from Arab news networks, BBC. I don't think everyone is lying or world is conspiring against China.
That's right ,watch more first hand video especially foreign travelers vlog, the more the better , and try to figure it out yourself.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom