What's new

Viettel to adopt self-developed 5G tech

Viet

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 18, 2012
Messages
29,950
Reaction score
0
Country
Viet Nam
Location
Germany
State-owned Viettel's move comes as neighbors lean toward Chinese technology

TOMOYA ONISHI, Nikkei staff writerAPRIL 10, 2019 17:59 JST

https%3A%2F%2Fs3-ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com%2Fpsh-ex-ftnikkei-3937bb4%2Fimages%2F6%2F5%2F3%2F3%2F20193356-1-eng-GB%2FAP_519549801390.jpg

Women from the ethnic Hmong tribe in northern Vietnam. As the country fell behind in introducing 4G services, Hanoi aims to release 5G as soon as possible. © AP

HANOI -- Viettel Group, Vietnam's largest mobile telecom operator, intends to use its own core technology to build a fifth-generation network as the state-owned company prepares to launch ultrahigh-speed wireless services by 2021.

"Viettel has invested millions of dollars to develop 5G chips and is working on developing devices with 5G chips," a company representative told the Nikkei Asian Review on Monday.

The telecom aims to complete the trial for an initial version of a 5G broadcast station this year, then test a 5G station network by 2020 and offer products in 2021, the representative said.

About half of Vietnam's subscribers to high-speed mobile services use those offered by the company, formally known as Viettel Military Industry and Telecoms Group.

Southeast Asia is at the forefront of 5G competition as the tech showdown between the U.S. and China intensifies. The choice of either Western or Chinese technology could draw a dividing line in the region.

While Thailand, the Philippines and other countries lean toward Huawei, Vietnam looks to pursue its own path. Major Vietnamese telecom companies are seen to lean on proprietary or Western technology to launch their 5G services.

Viettel's 5G efforts focus on the advanced chipsets housed inside the core element designed to process data from numerous devices connected to the network.

However, Viettel's ambition to develop its own semiconductors for the core networks could be challenging as it requires accumulated efforts and years to bear fruit. Meanwhile, it will need numerous different chips to build a reliable system.

Market leaders Huawei, Nokia and Ericsson still rely on chip developers including Intel, Xilinx, Broadcom, Skyworks, Qorvo and others to provide the high-end chips needed for competitive 5G systems. In addition, Huawei has poured billions of dollars a year into research and development to secure its leading position in the 5G era.

Given its insufficient accumulation of the needed expertise, however, Viettel might choose equipment made by Nokia or Ericsson, depending on its progress in the ongoing tests, according to the press reports.

"As it self-develops its 5G chips, Viettel is continuing to look for more opportunities to cooperate, invest and share experiences with experts and partners, both at home and abroad," the Viettel representative told the Nikkei.

Viettel decided to develop and produce core network equipment "to avoid the risk of being unable to support the safety and security of the national telecommunications network," the representative said. Viettel aims to produce "80% of our telecom core network infrastructure" equipment by 2020.

The state-owned company's policy on technology adoption reflects Hanoi's interest. The prime minister nominates Viettel's chairman based on a proposal by the Defense Ministry and with agreement of the Communist Party's Central Committee.

With Vietnam having agreed to enhance defense cooperation with the U.S., a locally based Western diplomatic source told Nikkei that Hanoi might fall into step with Washington's attempts to shut out Huawei's 5G equipment.

Vinaphone, the country's second-ranked operator, reportedly is preparing to collaborate with Finland's Nokia. Third-ranked Vietnam Mobile Telecom Services One Member, also known as MobiFone, reportedly intends to work with Samsung Electronics of South Korea.

Vinaphone and Nokia agreed last year to develop 5G solutions together, and the two companies are discussing plans for an R&D center that would cover the "internet of things" and network technologies.

The U.S. is pressuring other countries to drop Huawei from their mobile networks, due to fears that Beijing uses the equipment for spying -- concerns that Huawei says are unfounded.

"Local carriers generally prefer Western brands, and Huawei is being affected by the current accusations by the U.S. and boycotts of its products by other countries," a top executive at a major tech company based in Vietnam who requested anonymity told the Nikkei Asian Review.

"While Huawei had dominated Vietnam's market with its flexible services and competitive prices, the race had been changing after other vendors, including Ericsson and Nokia, changed their price strategies for their Vietnamese partners," the executive said. "However, Huawei still has chances to provide some kind of devices for 5G services in Vietnam."

Huawei thinks it stands a good chance of being chosen to supply 5G equipment to Vietnam.

"We cannot be beaten on quality or cost" in Vietnam, the company's local chief executive told the Nikkei Asian Review in February. "Huawei will provide better technology and solutions, along with financial support to local operators to deploy 5G."

Nikkei staff writer Cheng Ting-Fang in Taipei contributed to this report.


https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/5G-networks/Vietnam-s-top-telecom-to-adopt-self-developed-5G-tech
 
. .
LoL, Vietnam should start investing in 3g first.
 
. . . . .
next time viet airforce will deploy self-developed 5G fighter
Too wide stretched ha ha but we have this one.
unmanned 57mm AAA gun, radar/opto guided target acquisition, auto loading, 70-100 rounds per minute :-)


viet-nam-tu-dong-hoa-thanh-cong-phao-phong-khong_161043438.jpg
 
.
@Nilgiri

5g made in Vietnam :tup:
Ok, I have to say as someone who used to work in the Telecom industry, 5G tech is not difficult to make. People knew how to do it for quite sometime now. It's difficult to describe why it took until now to do it, but just on speed alone, you need phones to be able to handle the processing without compromising the battery and the sites/apps to require it, as well as a host of other things that has little to do with the 5G standards at all.

It is the architecture and the supporting technology that makes it important.

5G has a lot to do with automated driving, smart homes, and, a term I hate, internet of things in general.

So Vietnam making it isn't ground breaking. What makes Huawei so dangerous to America is China has the technology and customer base to actually implement its supporting technology. Autonomous driving for one needs an amount of data only America and China has. No one else can even consider making this in a meaningful way without access to these data.

So I would say it's a good direction, but let's not get ahead of ourselves. It's nice to say, but it's like saying someone is Cristiano because they kicked a ball before.
 
.
Ok, I have to say as someone who used to work in the Telecom industry, 5G tech is not difficult to make. People knew how to do it for quite sometime now. It's difficult to describe why it took until now to do it, but just on speed alone, you need phones to be able to handle the processing without compromising the battery and the sites/apps to require it, as well as a host of other things that has little to do with the 5G standards at all.

It is the architecture and the supporting technology that makes it important.

5G has a lot to do with automated driving, smart homes, and, a term I hate, internet of things in general.

So Vietnam making it isn't ground breaking. What makes Huawei so dangerous to America is China has the technology and customer base to actually implement its supporting technology. Autonomous driving for one needs an amount of data only America and China has. No one else can even consider making this in a meaningful way without access to these data.

So I would say it's a good direction, but let's not get ahead of ourselves. It's nice to say, but it's like saying someone is Cristiano because they kicked a ball before.
Ok you made valid points. But I wonder why people believe 5g is a revolution, open the door for a new world? 5g isn’t a Internet of things, not self driving cars. 5g is just a transport medium. That is all. It’s like a Autobahn. Some people even believe 5g is superfast but if looking closer, the max theorical speed 20 Gbit. Ok but that is for all uses within a cell. So we are talking about 1 Gbit or so. Ok that is still great. Greater than 4g with 0.1 Gbit. However if one considers fixed line Ethernet technology offers 1 Gbit per user per default, and now we are going to 100 Gbit and more to 400 Gbit, then 5g is still too slow.

Why do you believe the amount of data has to do whether you are US or China. Only for big countries?

If your computer drives a car you mean it can only work on chinese Autobahn?
 
.
.
Nonsense. There are realistic tests that were carried out to calculate how much data is necessary to drive a car automously. On Autobahn, on highways, considering all weather conditions and other factors. Some put it at 20 TB per hours. That equals a required bandwidth of 40 Gbit. 5g with 1 Gbit is too slow.
 
.
Nonsense. There are realistic tests that were carried out to calculate how much data is necessary to drive a car automously. On Autobahn, on highways, considering all weather conditions and other factors. Some put it at 20 TB per hours. That equals a required bandwidth of 40 Gbit. 5g with 1 Gbit is too slow.
OK. Then please Vietnam to give up 5G:lol::lol:5G is useless:enjoy:
 
.
Nonsense. There are realistic tests that were carried out to calculate how much data is necessary to drive a car automously. On Autobahn, on highways, considering all weather conditions and other factors. Some put it at 20 TB per hours. That equals a required bandwidth of 40 Gbit. 5g with 1 Gbit is too slow.

5G provide quick telemetry for cars. But all the driving logic is performed in the cars. The problem with 5 G is that it doesn’t guarantee latency. I don’t think there is a plan to do so.
 
.
5G provide quick telemetry for cars. But all the driving logic is performed in the cars. The problem with 5 G is that it doesn’t guarantee latency. I don’t think there is a plan to do so.
The latency is not a problem. 5g has a latency of 1ms. The problem is whether or not the car can process all enormous data quickly enough to drive, let’s say in bad weather condition, sudden change of traffic, police control point, etc. Assuming you let your car drive over a high bridge in blue sky. Suddenly the sky becomes dark, it’s raining, visibility becomes zero. But as you buy a cheap version Taiwan car, which doesn’t care of good or bad weather, your car continues to drive at high speed.

Well, the bright side of the story, your wife gets rich thanks to the payout of your life insurance.

:woot:
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom