What's new

VARIOUS PAF STRIKE PACKAGES

Main Merit of Physiological war To Shatter you opponent Physiologically and break Support for govt in people.
Modi 2019 victory Makes story quite opposite

Basically you ask any Indian Even in Opposition He Will Agreed that PM Did great in Raising Escalation level By calling Airstrike Whether It failed or Succeeded
Its Set a New norm To Counter attack Calling the Pakistan-nuclear bluff


Good or bad But This is Politically Essential. If congress ever come to power It Will be New norm Where It has to Outscore BJP


It is Good or bad its another story

But Its clear India Is too eager To engage Pakistan Conventionally.
What It Will Lead To in future is a thing to observe
Why tf do indians think some small skirmishes with stand off weapons means Pakistan has to reply with nukes? Are u dumb. By that same logic we tested india's nuclear bluff because our airstrikes in india and we actually shot down a jet. Besides it was india who backed down on the 28th from missile strikes not Pakistan. The only bluff that was called was indias. No true superpower would back down after getting airstrikes and losing a jet.
 
.
The only bluff that was called was indias. No true superpower would back down after getting airstrikes and losing a jet.
Had they sent their missiles/Brahmos into Pakistan, we would have reciprocated their action by manifolds.
 
.
With these beauties PAF can strike any corner of India or any adversary. We always had bombers in the past, maybe China might offer them with deep discount these days!
e98bc15c-4bf8-11ea-9b4e-9c10402c07b7_image_hires_221640.jpg


sAcBcHu.jpg




 
. .
With these beauties PAF can strike any corner of India or any adversary. We always had bombers in the past, maybe China might offer them with deep discount these days!
e98bc15c-4bf8-11ea-9b4e-9c10402c07b7_image_hires_221640.jpg


sAcBcHu.jpg



I know it's off topic but whose F16 is that beside the H-6.
 
. . .
It was a pure political stunt played out by the airforce for GoI. As they say "War is a means to a political end." Post Pulwama, Modi literally did this in the worst possible way it can be carried out.

Half hearted attempt by IAF --- very obvious from lack of detailed planning and poor execution.

What happened afterwards, was a thoroughly professional response--- well planned, well executed.

Where India made a dent was its overwhelming control over pushing their narrative across!!

The looser's were the regular Indian Anil and Babu Ram... who were led to believe that they came out on top and this will be the new norm.

Even in Galwan/Laddakh, lies have been spun by GoI controlled media. Once again, Anil & Babu Ram thinks they did not loose an inch of their so called territory and came out on top. This spin doctoring will one day come back and bite hard in someones a*s!!!
 
.
It was a pure political stunt played out by the airforce for GoI. As they say "War is a means to a political end." Post Pulwama, Modi literally did this in the worst possible way it can be carried out.

Half hearted attempt by IAF --- very obvious from lack of detailed planning and poor execution.

What happened afterwards, was a thoroughly professional response--- well planned, well executed.

Where India made a dent was its overwhelming control over pushing their narrative across!!

The looser's were the regular Indian Anil and Babu Ram... who were led to believe that they came out on top and this will be the new norm.

Even in Galwan/Laddakh, lies have been spun by GoI controlled media. Once again, Anil & Babu Ram thinks they did not loose an inch of their so called territory and came out on top. This spin doctoring will one day come back and bite hard in someones a*s!!!
Baghdad Bob has been replaced by Dehli Deepak
 
. .
And in the aftermath of that we may very well get screwed too only now not by our doing.
I agree with you. Jingoism by Nuclear Powers is not recommended nor practiced at all. India is being extremely irresponsible by building up a internal narrative of invincibility and bravado that might spin out of control and at some point its citizens might demand action and that too of a war instead of surgical strikes in response to freedom movement in IoK.

Similarly, we too face the same issue whereby some elements of the population think it is a joke to go to war and we should go to war on Kashmir not realizing the full consequences of doing that.

Unfortunately, can not hope to take IoK by force ..... but India has started believing it can take Pakistan or AJK/GB by force. This is an extremely dangerous supposition. Ramp down now or it can become death knell for both nations.
 
.
I agree with you. Jingoism by Nuclear Powers is not recommended nor practiced at all. India is being extremely irresponsible by building up a internal narrative of invincibility and bravado that might spin out of control and at some point its citizens might demand action and that too of a war instead of surgical strikes in response to freedom movement in IoK.

Similarly, we too face the same issue whereby some elements of the population think it is a joke to go to war and we should go to war on Kashmir not realizing the full consequences of doing that.

Unfortunately, can not hope to take IoK by force ..... but India has started believing it can take Pakistan or AJK/GB by force. This is an extremely dangerous supposition. Ramp down now or it can become death knell for both nations.

India china and pakistan are all heading towards war, sooner or later it will happen, the events starting from aug 5 last year will culminate in kinetic action. Not because of false bravado but due to necessity, post galwan india china relations will never be same, it should have settled by now through political means but it has not. But it is moving towards economic front which is even more dangerous. China had to move in and will not back due to CPEC and india's stance on GB.
 
.
Similarly, we too face the same issue whereby some elements of the population think it is a joke to go to war and we should go to war on Kashmir not realizing the full consequences of doing that.
Every one agrees on the disasters of a full blown war, even the Indians other than its media thinks alike. In the past we have managed to have localised wars and skirmishes in the Kashmir Region. Some direct and some asymmetric. Kargil was a mix of both where we managed to use both and the Indians their air power. The first Kashmir war was localised and was asymmetric to start with. Than we had a whole decade of asymmetric war fare in Kashmir in the 80s, with our full support to dozens of freedom organisations, India had no answer to it.
 
.
post galwan india china relations will never be same, it should have settled by now through political means but it has not. But it is moving towards economic front which is even more dangerous. China had to move in and will not back due to CPEC and india's stance on GB.
You are spot on ,i completely agree with you.
 
.
everybody knows what war means between india and pakistan. no winners but complete destruction of the entire region. so i dont think we are going for a war. the media warriors and keyboard warriors dont know much about war specially a nuclear war but those who have the controls over their weapons on both sides of the border know their job well and they know what can be the consequences. thousands have died due to corona, economic loss is huge it doesnt mean we should go for a war and also lose what's still in our hands.

All out war is a remote possibility because both countries cannot sustain war expenditure and mobility even for 20 days as they have limited supply of weapons and fuel.

However, a short duration conflict at a smaller scale is very much possible due to some idiot sitting in the power corridor such as Modi.

The outcome will always be unexpected...........
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom