What's new

US Welcomes China’s RIMPAC Spying

GR!FF!N

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 11, 2012
Messages
8,706
Reaction score
-4
Country
India
Location
India
The top U.S. commander in the Pacific said he welcomes China’s spying on the Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) maritime exercises.

As The Diplomat previously noted, China sent an uninvited Dongdiao-class auxiliary general intelligence (AGI) ship to the 22-nation maritime exercise off the coast of Hawaii this month. The ship, which is operating inside Hawaii’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ), is “designed to gather electronic and communication data from surrounding vessels and aircraft,” according to USNI News. Although China sent a similar vessel to observe the RIMPAC exercise in 2012, this year China is actually participating in the exercise for the first time.

But Admiral Samuel J. Locklear III, Commander of the U.S. Pacific Command (PACOM)– which leads RIMPAC– is not only unconcerned about China’s surveillance, he appears to actually welcome it in some regards. When asked about the AGI ship’s presence at RIMPAC during a press conference on Tuesday, the admiral began by responding:

“The good news about this is that it’s a recognition, I think, or an acceptance by the Chinese of what we’ve been saying to them for some time, [which] is that military operations and survey operations in another country’s EEZs, where you have national — your own national security interest, are within international law and are acceptable. And this is a fundamental right that nations have.”

Locklear appeared to be referring to China’s long-standing opposition to the U.S. and other foreign navies operating in its own EEZ, which stretch out 200 nautical miles from a country’s coast. Although the UN Convention on the Law of Seas guarantees free navigation for peaceful vessels in other countries’ EEZ, Beijing has long maintained that surveillance does not meet this peaceful standard.

This disagreement has led Chinese vessels to repeatedly harass U.S. Navy ships operating in China’s EEZ. At times, Beijing has formally called on the U.S. Navy to cease its operations in China’s EEZ. For example, in 2009 China’s Defense Ministry released a statement saying that:

“China believes the constant U.S. military air and sea surveillance and survey operations in China’s exclusive economic zone had led to military confrontations between the two sides. The way to resolve China-U.S. maritime incidents is for the U.S. to change its surveillance and survey operations policies against China, decrease and eventually stop such operations.”

However, after reports surfaced of the AGI’s surveillance of RIMPAC, China’s Defense Ministry resolutely defended the operation, stating: “The People’s Liberation Army naval ships’ operation in waters outside the territorial seas of other countries is in line with international law and international practice.”

Thus, Locklear’s comments on Tuesday appear to be aimed at seizing this opportunity to reinforce America’s right to have U.S. naval vessels survey China from within its EEZ.

Nonetheless, Locklear did remark that it was odd for a country participating in a maritime exercise for the first time to also send a surveillance vessel to spy on that exercise. He began by saying that he believes the Chinese recognize their participation at RIMPAC is “an opportunity for them to interact on a broad scale with 22 nations, some of them that they have disagreements with in other areas. And it’s an opportunity to build trust and confidence.” The PACOM commander then added: “The introduction of the AGI kind of made it look a little odd, but it hasn’t stopped the exercise and it hasn’t created any difficulties in the exercise. And I guess on the other good side, it gives the Chinese the opportunity to see how their own ships are doing… which I understand is pretty good.”

Locklear has overseen PACOM at a time when the U.S. and China have significantly strengthened their military-to-military relationship, even as maritime tensions throughout the region continue to rise.

He has long urged China’s military to be more transparent. For instance, in an interview with The Diplomat last year, Locklear said of China’s military modernization: “What we should be concerned about though is what we perceive as a lack of transparency on their part in why they are building the type of systems they are building. Quite frankly, it makes their neighbors nervous and it gives us some cause for concern here at PACOM about the type of military they are building and the type of equipment they are buying. I have discussed this with my Chinese counterparts.”


US Welcomes China’s RIMPAC Spying | The Diplomat
 
.
“The good news about this is that it’s a recognition, I think, or an acceptance by the Chinese of what we’ve been saying to them for some time, [which] is that military operations and survey operations in another country’s EEZs, where you have national — your own national security interest, are within international law and are acceptable. And this is a fundamental right that nations have.”

Admiral Samuel J. Locklear III, Commander of the U.S. Pacific Command (PACOM)
 
.
“The good news about this is that it’s a recognition, I think, or an acceptance by the Chinese of what we’ve been saying to them for some time, [which] is that military operations and survey operations in another country’s EEZs, where you have national — your own national security interest, are within international law and are acceptable. And this is a fundamental right that nations have.”

Admiral Samuel J. Locklear III, Commander of the U.S. Pacific Command (PACOM)

Good to see Admiral Locklear expose Chinas double standards and hypocrisy.
 
. . .
Good to see Admiral Locklear expose Chinas double standards and hypocrisy.

oh no, China uses double standards, well you are right when you are right, this kind of thing just don't happen in democracy.

Not the point, the point is we can now spy on American coast, so, yea we were hypocritical, so, what? The important thing is we can spy on America with ships.

As time goes on, this will happen more and more often, circling Japan is already part of the military exercises, wait until we push to past Guam and straight to LA, then you won't hear any more hypocrisy on that.

If no hypocrisy is what you wanted.
 
.
oh no, China uses double standards, well you are right when you are right, this kind of thing just don't happen in democracy.

Not the point, the point is we can now spy on American coast, so, yea we were hypocritical, so, what? The important thing is we can spy on America with ships.

As time goes on, this will happen more and more often, circling Japan is already part of the military exercises, wait until we push to past Guam and straight to LA, then you won't hear any more hypocrisy on that.

If no hypocrisy is what you wanted.

Sugoi!! Cho kakkoii!

:lol:
 
.
oh no, China uses double standards, well you are right when you are right, this kind of thing just don't happen in democracy.

Not the point, the point is we can now spy on American coast, so, yea we were hypocritical, so, what? The important thing is we can spy on America with ships.

As time goes on, this will happen more and more often, circling Japan is already part of the military exercises, wait until we push to past Guam and straight to LA, then you won't hear any more hypocrisy on that.

If no hypocrisy is what you wanted.
I believe I hit a nerve. You should worry more about your logistical capability in your own backyard, before your dive into the deep end of the pool. As the search for Flight 370 showed, you have much to learn.
 
.
I believe I hit a nerve. You should worry more about your logistical capability in your own backyard, before your dive into the deep end of the pool. As the search for Flight 370 showed, you have much to learn.
indeed, there are tons of problems facing China, it's not so much our equipments are no good or training, but we have glaring holes in our capability.

Especially in heavy lift helicopters and transports planes. We have no platform to build good anti sub and good transport capabilities.

So yes, we have big problems, but it's in the works, J-20, C-919, Z-20, more and more are on the way. These will dramatically improve our combat capabilities, mostly because they are not replace, they are starting, which means 0 to something.

So big problem yes.

Not only that, far easier to go from 60 ton cargo, to 100, than from 0 to 60. So, we are more than half way there already.
 
. . .
Not double standards nor hypocrisy but reciprocity, nothing American can do about it.:lol:

Oh we absolutely could, but we have chosen rather to act as professionals and gain the moral high ground thereby exposing your double standards to the world.
 
. .
Now US got what it wanted,they will be all over SCS now i mean for survey operations.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom