What's new

US troop withdrawal leaves Pakistan vulnerable to attack by insurgents

fd24

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 23, 2011
Messages
5,864
Reaction score
0
Pakistani militants are exploiting a security vacuum left by the departure of US troops from a swath of eastern Afghanistan to mount attacks inside Pakistan, triggering cross-border violence that has claimed dozens of lives and inflamed already tense relations between Islamabad and Kabul.

The Pakistani military on Monday called on the government of Hamid Karzai to arrest and hand over Maulvi Fazlullah, a Pakistani Taliban leader also known as "Mullah Radio" who, it said, had been using Afghan soil to mount cross-border raids that have killed dozens of soldiers in recent months.

"Information about these individuals and groups has been passed to the Afghan government and Nato but no action has been taken," said Major General Athar Abbas, the Pakistani military spokesman. "Fazlullah is going from strength to strength, day by day."

Afghans claim that the Pakistani military has responded to the incursions by indiscriminately firing artillery across the border, hitting villages in attacks that have killed at least 43 civilians since last May.

"They want to destroy Afghanistan," Ehsanullah, a 25-year-old teacher from Kunar province told the Guardian. "They want people to rise up and demonstrate against the government and the Americans."

Most fighting in Afghanistan is concentrated in the south and west, in territory controlled by Taliban and Haqqani network fighters. But the Taliban's Pakistani cousins have taken advantage of the US departure from Kunar and Nuristan, in the east, to open a new front in the conflict.

President Barack Obama pulled most US forces from the two provinces in 2009 as part of the "surge" into the southern provinces. American generals considered them virtual lost causes. Taliban fighters had overrun a small US base in Nuristan in 2008, killing nine US soldiers, while years of fighting in Kunar's Korengal valley had caused heavy casualties with little progress to show.

Now about 3,500 US troops remain in Kunar but none in Nuristan. The diminished western presence has facilitated Pakistani Taliban fighters, led by Fazlullah, who fled the Swat valley following a major offensive in 2009. They have joined forces with local fighters and Maulvi Faqir Muhammad, another Pakistani fugitive, to mount attacks into Pakistan.

In June, Taliban fighters rounded up 16 Pakistani border guards in Dir district and killed them on video. In late August, hundreds of fighters slipped into neighbouring Chitral for a night raid that killed at least 35 soldiers as they slept in their tents, prompting the first Pakistani army deployment to the area since the Taliban insurgency began.

Pakistani forces have responded to the incursions by shelling suspected Taliban positions. But some shells have crossed into Afghanistan, often landing in inhabited areas.

Sadar Owila, an elder from Kunar, narrowly avoided death in mid-September when, he claimed, a Pakistani shell exploded beside his vehicle moments after he entered a mosque.

"The windows shattered and my driver was injured by shrapnel," he said. "The people in the mosque said that if they die there, at least they will go to paradise." He added that over 100 families had left the border area for safety elsewhere. Aminullah Amarkhil, a police chief in charge of a 100-mile stretch of frontier, said that 43 people had been killed and 54 wounded since May.

Abbas, the Pakistani spokesman, admitted some shells were falling in Afghanistan, but said it was not "intentional fire".

The cross-border shelling has led to a storm of protest in Kabul, where parliamentarians have angrily accused President Karzai of "going soft" on Pakistan to facilitate contacts with the Taliban.

A profusion of conspiracy theories and misinformation on both sides of the border further complicates matters. Many Afghans see the Pakistani shelling as part of a nefarious policy directed by the main military spy service, Inter-Services Intelligence.

Several villagers from border regions told the Guardian that Pakistan was trying to clear civilians from the areas, or seize control of the Kunar river. Many insisted their territory was largely insurgent free and said Pakistani accounts of Taliban attacks were overblown.

But across the border, senior politicians and police officials claimed Nato soldiers were orchestrating the Taliban raids as part of an unspecified plot to destabilise Pakistan.

"The Nato forces and the Indian army are helping these people. They are supporting them, giving money to them, running training camps. It is quite clear," said Muhammad Anwar Khan, a provincial parliamentarian with the ruling Pakistan People's party from Upper Dir.

The Pakistani indignation has an ironic twist. The military has long been accused of supporting Taliban fighters in Waziristan and other tribal districts at the western end of the border; now they find themselves under attack in the opposite direction on the eastern side.

While intensified US operations in southern Afghanistan over the last two years have produced impressive results – the number of attacks initiated by insurgents on Nato and Afghan forces are well down on previous years – the east has deteriorated.

And Kunar and Nuristan pose particular problems. Although the provinces, with their multiple smuggling routes and cross-border traffic by insurgents, lumber smugglers and other groups, are important to both the government and the militants, they are also exceptionally difficult to control.

The latest exchanges could be a harbinger of what lies ahead after most western troops leave in 2014.

Western strategy hinges on handing control to a beefed-up Afghan army supported by a much smaller western contingent of perhaps 10,000 to 20,000 soldiers.

But if the Pakistani and Afghan governments have failed to secure their common border areas by then, the Taliban could step up attacks in both directions across the porous border, with dire consequences for stability in both countries.

Glad to see Nato and India are helping Pakistan in their very special way


http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/oct/17/us-troop-withdrawal-pakistan-vulnerable
 
.
US and Afghanistan blames Pakistan for giving free reins to Taliban in its border region, allowing Taliban to crossover and launch attacks....Pakistan blames US and Afghans for not securing its borders allowing Taliban to do the same..yet none of these countries are able to secure their own borders and the blame game continues...
 
.
US and Afghanistan blames Pakistan for giving free reins to Taliban in its border region, allowing Taliban to crossover and launch attacks....Pakistan blames US and Afghans for not securing its borders allowing Taliban to do the same..yet none of these countries are able to secure their own borders and the blame game continues...


Agree about securing the borders. Pakistan must not allow the border control to be so lapse.
I note you have not mentioned the invariable assistance India and Nato are offering to third parties to destabilize Pakistan. Is that playing with "a straight bat"? Is that not inevitably a bigger crime? The involvement of third parties is shameful and unnecessary for anyone seriously wanting peace.
 
.
Agree about securing the borders. Pakistan must not allow the border control to be so lapse.
I note you have not mentioned the invariable assistance India and Nato are offering to third parties to destabilize Pakistan. Is that playing with "a straight bat"? Is that not inevitably a bigger crime? The involvement of third parties is shameful and unnecessary for anyone seriously wanting peace.


"The Nato forces and the Indian army are helping these people. They are supporting them, giving money to them, running training camps. It is quite clear," said Muhammad Anwar Khan, a provincial parliamentarian with the ruling Pakistan People's party from Upper Dir."

And so claims the Pakistanis(on their lucky day even Israeli are blamed) ..however American also claim some thing similar about Pakistanis..now tell me what to believe and what not too.
 
.
i agree that both blaming each other BUT my point is If USA and Afghanistan is sincere in stopping cross border movement of Talibans then why they are against fencing the border ? and why USA and NATO removed their check posts from That area when PAk army started operation in swat and adjacent areas ?
 
.
i agree that both blaming each other BUT my point is If USA and Afghanistan is sincere in stopping cross border movement of Talibans then why they are against fencing the border ? and why USA and NATO removed their check posts from That area when PAk army started operation in swat and adjacent areas ?

Pakistan should simply fence the border up asap - its a no brainer and would bring down this free walking between countries.
 
. . . .
Pakistan should simply fence the border up asap - its a no brainer and would bring down this free walking between countries.

I agree, this is the only way we can get rid of infiltration. Fence the boarder(as much as possible), reinforce it by putting land mines. search the militants across the country and shoot them at the spot.

Bit difficult but not impossible.
 
.
I agree with doctor. Its not possible to "seal" that border off. In addition to that, I believe its just one of manoeuvres by coalition forces. Dont know if the intention is to see Pakistan`s reaction or something. They cannot really seal the border off, mainly because of two reasons:

1. It cant be done with "hundreds of US troops". They need thousands - add a duplicate number for rotation on duties and the number exceeds even more

2. The border region between Pak / Afghan area is not under "control" of world forces. Independent fighters pretty much dominate the area. They possibly cannot do anything concrete in the area which isnt under their control.
 
.
Me too, its damn confusing. Just a year ago there wasn't a practical way for US troops to seal the boarder.

Commander: US Can't Seal Afghan-Pakistan Border - ABC News
Don't think they are sealing the border for Pakistan's sake,they are primarily doing it to protect themselves from further attacks by the Haqqani faction(their claims,not mine).Pakistan stands to benefit from this action too.

To entertain both assertions would mean somebody is obviously lying.
 
.
dont get confused ...... i think practically its impossible to seal that border because the terrain of that area is complicated

jee doctor sahib... app pehle wale confused kay kehne ka matlab nae samjhay.
 
. . .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom