What's new

US sends aircraft carrier and bomber task force to 'warn Iran'

.
If you want peace , you should be prepared for war ....

And recently people in military.ir calling me COWARD for saying Iran should have Nukes .....

well they do not know as much as you do, if the nuclear weapons were that bad, then all of the world powers would have destroyed them by now. mutual destruction is the first threat people used against each other.
 
.
Just a hypothetical question I like Iran but:
If Iran and Pakistan were to go to war and both sides were fighting it out with no one to support them and Pakistan used no nukes who would win?
Great question! My gut tells me it would most likely be a stalemate. Buuuut...i worry poorer countries fare worse in non-short term conflicts.

It could be a slow build up against Iran which could take between 6-12 months.

Or it has something to do with the US withdrawal from Afghanistan.
You're correct it might be slow- But Iran will catch onto it and will start fighting b4 the build up reaches maturation stage. Do you see why Iran is such a problem to US? there is NO element of surprise.

show of force by american navy and a clear message to iran.pakistan should think about itself and seal the border.we don't want another bin laden type story.mullah regime in iran will surely hide in pakistan in case of war so we should seal the border.unfortunately comman man in iran will die just because of this mullah regime.i don't know what they want.entire world is against iran.europe currently have good relations with iran but they will not help iran against massive american navy.irani government isn't doing anything for peace.arabs will be very happy and it's a possibility that they too attack iran alongside with americans so it's time for iran to use diplomatic channels and persuade americans to stop.
AMerican war planners think like you....and they always get surprised.
 
.
Bro I always thought Iran already has nukes. Can you give me some more material or links to read up more on it?
yes bro.

Project Midan: Developing and Building an Underground Nuclear Test Site in Iran

Project_Midan_Figure14b.png


CaNZLznXEAA36QO.jpg


Project_Midan_Figure17.png


Project_Midan_Figure17b.png


Project_Midan_Figure15a.png



http://www.trackpersia.com/project-midan-developing-building-underground-nuclear-test-site-iran/


http://isis-online.org/isis-reports...uilding-an-underground-nuclear-test-site-in-i
 
.
Arabian gulf is getting interested day by day
Correction- Persian Gulf. dont show ur either brainwashed, rude or ignorant.

I wonder what's so interesting to send an aircraft carrier to a place infested with Somalia pirates and helping KSA bombing a country which is noteven equipped to defend itself from attack by a utility helicopter.

I don't get what interested about USA routinely send an aircraft carrier to mediteranian or red sea and Bolton find it good time to open his mouth
Ask IRGC+ Iranian Navy. Their opinion will be valuable.

pakistan tried to save afghanistan
No, Pakistan tried to control Afghanistan and use Afghanistan as a shield/strategic depth against India.


and still paying the price.
Why shouldnt you? you tricked America and Afghans into thinking you wanted peace in Afghanistan but in reality you were executing your self interested strategic interests- making Afghanistan your proxy/subordinate.

we should stay away from other conflicts.
You really should, unless you are fully motivated and committed. You also dont have the $ for war.

look at our economy.you can still find large number of afghans living in pakistan.
You destabilized their country so what do you expect? You send proxy into India and India gets aggressive and you say the same crap- look what India is doing to us. Take responsibility and own the good and bad.

if pakistan provide help to iran,you will see millions of irani in pakistan and pakistan will become shia wahhabi war zone.we aren't responsible for saving other countries.
Helping and saving are 2 different things, and dont act like you are hospitable friend of Iran's. Pakistan will help Iran but Pakistan cant and wont save Iran. Pakistan will give Iran help due to Muslim brotherhood and thats it.

Bro I always thought Iran already has nukes. Can you give me some more material or links to read up more on it?
To have a nuclear device as a country you have to test one. When did IRan test a nuclear explosive device?
 
.
Looks like pentagon supports this move


Pentagon: US carrier sent to Middle East on credible Iran threat
The acting US defence secretary says carrier, bombers sent to region due to indications of 'credible threat' by Iran.

23 hours ago
Acting US Secretary of Defense Patrick Shanahan said on Monday that he had approved sending a carrier strike group and bombers to the Middle East because of indications of a "credible threat by Iranian regime forces".


"[It] represents a prudent repositioning of assets in response to indications of a credible threat by Iranian regime forces," Shanahan said on Twitter.

"We call on the Iranian regime to cease all provocation. We will hold the Iranian regime accountable for any attack on US forces or our interests," he added.

Shanahan in his tweet provided no details on the threat.

US National Security Adviser John Bolton said on Sunday that the United States was deploying the Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group and a bomber task force to the Middle East to send a message to Iran.

Keyvan Khosravi, spokesman for Iran's supreme national security council, said on Monday that Bolton's statement was "a clumsy use of an out-of-date event for psychological warfare".

Tasnim news agency quoted Khosravi as saying that Iranian armed forces had observed the carrier entering the Mediterranean Sea 21 days ago.

Bolton "lacks military and security understanding and his remarks are mostly meant to draw attention to himself", Khosravi added.

Three US officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity, told Reuters News Agency on Monday that "multiple, credible threats" picked up by intelligence were primarily against US forces in Iraq by Iran and its proxy forces. They said there was also concern about US forces in Syria and in the waters nearby.

One of the officials said the intelligence was specific enough that it detailed the locations of potential attacks against US forces and the timeframe within which it could occur. The official added that the threat was not only against US forces in Iraq but those coming in and out of the region. There are currently about 5,200 US troops in Iraq and under 2,000 American forces in Syria.

Increased pressure
The US action marked the latest in a series of moves by President Donald Trump's administration aimed at ratcheting up pressure on Iran in recent months.

190504073832283
The Trump administration's efforts to impose political and economic isolation on Tehran began last year when it unilaterally withdrew from the nuclear deal it and other world powers negotiated with Iran in 2015.

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, speaking in Finland where he was attending the Arctic Council meeting, said on Monday the United States has seen activity from Iran that indicated a possible "escalation", one day after the United States said it would send a carrier strike group to the Middle East to counter a "credible threat by Iranian regime forces."

Last month, Trump announced the US will no longer exempt any countries from US sanctions if they continue to buy Iranian oil, a decision that primarily affects the five remaining major importers: China and India and US treaty allies Japan, South Korea and Turkey. The US also recently designated Iran's Revolutionary Guard as a "terrorist group", the first ever for an entire division of another government.

190504114003351
In response, Iran said it has mobilised all its resources to sell oil in a "grey market".

Amir Hossein Zamaninia, Iran's deputy oil minister, told state media on Sunday that Iran would continue to export oil despite the US sanctions, which he said were neither just nor legitimate.

"We have mobilised all of the country's resources and are selling oil in the 'grey market'," state news agency IRNA quoted Zamaninia as saying.

"We certainly won't sell 2.5 million barrels per day as under the [nuclear deal]," he said. "We will need to make serious decisions about our financial and economic management, and the government is working on that."

Meanwhile, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani called for the country to "resist and unite" against US pressure in what he called a "war on hope" waged against the Islamic Republic.

"America will only let go of this game when it realises it cannot achieve anything. We have no way but to resist and unite," Rouhani said in a televised speech on Saturday.

"Our war today is the war on hope. They want to break our hope, and we have to break their hope."
 
.
Correction- Persian Gulf. dont show ur either brainwashed, rude or ignorant.


Ask IRGC+ Iranian Navy. Their opinion will be valuable.


No, Pakistan tried to control Afghanistan and use Afghanistan as a shield/strategic depth against India.



Why shouldnt you? you tricked America and Afghans into thinking you wanted peace in Afghanistan but in reality you were executing your self interested strategic interests- making Afghanistan your proxy/subordinate.


You really should, unless you are fully motivated and committed. You also dont have the $ for war.


You destabilized their country so what do you expect? You send proxy into India and India gets aggressive and you say the same crap- look what India is doing to us. Take responsibility and own the good and bad.


Helping and saving are 2 different things, and dont act like you are hospitable friend of Iran's. Pakistan will help Iran but Pakistan cant and wont save Iran. Pakistan will give Iran help due to Muslim brotherhood and thats it.


To have a nuclear device as a country you have to test one. When did IRan test a nuclear explosive device?

I did not say they tested one. I said I think Iran has nukes.
 
. . .
Correction- Persian Gulf. dont show ur either brainwashed, rude or ignorant.


Ask IRGC+ Iranian Navy. Their opinion will be valuable.


No, Pakistan tried to control Afghanistan and use Afghanistan as a shield/strategic depth against India.



Why shouldnt you? you tricked America and Afghans into thinking you wanted peace in Afghanistan but in reality you were executing your self interested strategic interests- making Afghanistan your proxy/subordinate.


You really should, unless you are fully motivated and committed. You also dont have the $ for war.


You destabilized their country so what do you expect? You send proxy into India and India gets aggressive and you say the same crap- look what India is doing to us. Take responsibility and own the good and bad.


Helping and saving are 2 different things, and dont act like you are hospitable friend of Iran's. Pakistan will help Iran but Pakistan cant and wont save Iran. Pakistan will give Iran help due to Muslim brotherhood and thats it.


To have a nuclear device as a country you have to test one. When did IRan test a nuclear explosive device?

why are you talking to me like an indian? i think you are an indian.what kind of conflict are you talking about? a conflict which american army started to impress everyone and now begging for peace in afghanistan? americans are hammered badly in afghanistan and now americans blame pakistan for all their failures.now irgc don't stand any chance against americans.do you think iran have the power and courage to fight america? they will run away and americans would love to capture irani revolutionary jokers that's why i want pakistan to close border so that americans can't blame us later.if iran wants war,it can fight but nobody will help you and american will bring it's own government in iran after war.irani mullah are mad.they don't understand americans.americans can destroy entire irani navy within two to three days.irgc doesn't even stand a chance.what a joke.
 
Last edited:
.
The US is sending a ton of firepower to take on Iran — here's everything headed its way
Ryan Pickrell

2h
5cd1f62a021b4c0d0079d7b8-750-375.jpg

An F/A-18E Super Hornet on the flight deck of the USS Abraham Lincoln.
US Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Jeff Sherman
  • In response to the threat of a possible attack on US forces by Iran, the US military decided to send additional firepower to the Middle East, an area of responsibility overseen by US Central Command.
  • This includes an aircraft carrier with a full carrier air wing, one cruiser, four destroyers, and a group of heavy bombers.
  • The US has said it will respond to any Iranian attack on US interests with "unrelenting force."
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.



The US military is sending a carrier strike group and a bomber task force to the Middle East as a show of force to Iran. There is a ton of firepower heading that way.

The USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group, which consists of the carrier and its powerful carrier air wing, as well as one cruiser and four destroyers, is moving into the region with an unspecified number of B-52 Stratofortress heavy long-range bombers, according to US Central Command.

These assets, according to US Central Command, are being deployed in response to "clear indications that Iranian and Iranian proxy forces were making preparations to possibly attack US forces in the region." This is in addition to strategic assets already in the area.

Read more: Why the US suddenly decided to send an aircraft carrier and bombers to check Iran


Aircraft carrier: USS Abraham Lincoln
5a85dfd3d0307226008b4718-750-469.jpg

The USS Abraham Lincoln.
REUTERS/U.S. Navy/Chief Mass Communication Specialist Eric S. Powell/Handout
Adm. John Richardson, the chief of naval operations, previously described aircraft carriers as "tremendous expression of US national power." A carrier strike group is an even stronger message. "CSGs are visible and powerful symbols of U.S. commitment and resolve," US European Command said in a statement on Tuesday.

The USS Abraham Lincoln, a mobile sea-based airfield, is the lead ship for the carrier strike group that bears its name and is outfitted with a highly capable carrier air wing.

Carrier air wing: fighters, electronic-attack aircraft, early-warning aircraft, and rotary aircraft
5773f5e688e4a7b32e8b4b2f-750-518.jpg

An F/A-18E Super Hornet.
Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Ryan U. Kledzik/US Navy
Carrier Air Wing Seven consists of F/A-18 Super Hornets, EA-18G Growler electronic-attack aircraft, E-2 Hawkeye early-warning aircraft, and a number of rotary aircraft from multiple squadrons capable of carrying out a variety of operational tasks.
 
.
Last edited:
.
I did not say they tested one. I said I think Iran has nukes.
You cannot have 1 if you have not tested one OR been given one.No one has given Iran a nuke. Close the logic loop of your point.
 
. .
You cannot have 1 if you have not tested one OR been given one.No one has given Iran a nuke. Close the logic loop of your point.

One can have nukes even if it hasn't been tested. Pakistan had nukes even before they tested and they continued to deny their nukes.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom