What's new

US ready to act on Syria outside UN?

lem34

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
US ready to act on Syria outside UN?


Published: 31 May, 2012, 09:26



The US has hinted at taking actions against the Syrian regime bypassing the authority of the UN Security Council. This comes as pressure is piling up on Damascus following massacre in Houla that claimed over 100 lives.

US Ambassador to the UN Susan Rice has said that if the council does not take swift action to pressure Syrian authorities to end 14-month crackdown on the anti-government uprising, the Security Council members may have no choice but to consider acting outside the UN.

“Members of the international community are left with the option only of having to consider whether they are prepared to take actions outside of the Annan plan and the authority of this council,” Rice said on Wednesday after the 15-member council met in a closed door session to discuss last week’s massacre.

The United Nations is conducting its own investigation of who exactly is responsible for the bloodshed in the town of Houla. However the US and its allies seem to have come to their own conclusion, saying that the Assad government is solely responsible for the violence.

Rice did not specify what “actions” she meant. However the US and European countries had earlier imposed their own sanction on Syria outside the UN. So there are fears that her words could mean the threat of military action.

The US envoy said the worst but most probable scenario in Syria is a failure of Annan's peace plan and a spreading conflict that could create a major crisis not only in Syria but also in the entire region.

"The Syrian government has made commitments. It has blatantly violated those commitments, and, I think it's quite clear, as we have said for many weeks if they continue to do so there should be consequences," Rice said.

Meanwhile, Syria’s Ambassador to the UN Bashar Jaafari has stated Wednesday that the massacre in the town of Houla was carried out by “professional terrorists” who were seeking to ignite a sectarian conflict in the country.

“Many Syrian innocents got killed because of this misbehavior of these outsiders. The Syrian people need one clear-cut message that the international community, if there is an international community, is there to help settling the conflict in Syria," he said referring to last Friday's violence.

Russia’s envoy tot the UN Vitaly Churkin stated that both the authorities and opposition leaders should understand that the current situation in Syria is unacceptable.
Kosovo pattern in Syria?

Susan Rice’s comment became a disturbing reminder of what happened in 1999 when the US and NATO intervened in the former Yugoslavia without a UN Security Council mandate.

“The precedent is already there – we’ve mentioned Kosovo. It’s exactly what happened – you had an allegation of a massacre, which was the village of Racak; you had a UN decree that was severely bullied by the US ambassador who was leading the observation mission on the ground; you had claims that it was brutal unprovoked massacre of innocent civilians by government troops. Serbia was blamed, presented with the ultimatum and then bombed,” historian and author Nebojsa Malic told RT.

“We have the same pattern repeating itself in Syria.”

Blogger Rick Rozoff believes that the US has warned Russia and China that it will push forward military action no matter what.

“Ambassador Rice is basically telling Russia and China and other members of the Security Council that if they do not go along with Western plans for more stringent sanctions and other actions against Syria, the US and its NATO allies reserve a right to act outside the Security Council as they did with Yugoslavia 13 years ago and launch military actions against Syria,” Rozoff told RT


This will be interesting America calling Russia and China's bluff. I really hope American's take unilateral action outside the UN. If that is the case Russia and China even if they do not take action may speed up the formation of an anti Nato block of countries. Which could include Iran and Pakistan as willing partners
 
.
This will be interesting America calling Russia and China's bluff. I really hope American's take unilateral action outside the UN. If that is the case Russia and China even if they do not take action may speed up the formation of an anti Nato block of countries. Which could include Iran and Pakistan as willing partners

US, Russia and China are permanent members of the UNSC and are playing dirty politics. We know Iran is a strategic ally and has pacts with Syria so they need to be involved. What does Pakistan have to gain/lose by interfering in this mess?
 
.
US, Russia and China are permanent members of the UNSC and are playing dirty politics. We know Iran is a strategic ally and has pacts with Syria so they need to be involved. What does Pakistan have to gain/lose by interfering in this mess?

I was not suggesting that Pakistan gets involved in Syria. But if the UN is defunct and America will act as and how it pleases it is only a matter of time that it targets Iran and eventually Pakistan for regime change etc
 
. .
I was not suggesting that Pakistan gets involved in Syria. But if the UN is defunct and America will act as and how it pleases it is only a matter of time that it targets Iran and eventually Pakistan for regime change etc

US may target Iran diplomatically or covertly, but no leader in Pakistan, IK included, will be that hostile that they will plot a "regime" change in Pakistan.
 
. . .
Well, we are fully behind Syria, and Syria with support of China,Russia,Iran will not give up so easily. US would be punished severely

My issue is that Russians and Chinese are not doing anyone a favour. If they do not stand up soon it will encourage America to act against each of those countries one at a time
 
.
My issue is that Russians and Chinese are not doing anyone a favour. If they do not stand up soon it will encourage America to act against each of those countries one at a time

I agree with you about Russia, i am not sure if they will ACT when the US is ready to launch attacks on the Syrian government. Same story with China, but be sure that Iran will be there assisting the Syrian government against the American and Israeli nazis
 
.
Well, we are fully behind Syria, and Syria with support of China,Russia,Iran will not give up so easily. US would be punished severely

Iran's support is based on certain principles; people may judge your stance either way, but at least you guys are consistent. The US, Russia and China and just playing dirty geopolitics, otherwise one of them would have taken some stance, one way or the other.
 
.
I agree with you about Russia, i am not sure if they will ACT when the US is ready to launch attacks on the Syrian government. Same story with China, but be sure that Iran will be there assisting the Syrian government against the American and Israeli nazis

They would be unwise not to take a too relaxed view. I believe if Russians are not careful they will leave it too late

Iran's support is based on certain principles; people may judge your stance either way, but at least you guys are consistent. The US, Russia and China and just playing dirty geopolitics, otherwise one of them would have taken some stance, one way or the other.

But Russia and China even India and Pakistan have always supported non interference and non intervention without UN resolutions
 
.
^^ That is on paper Aryan_B, in real life politics are those countries you mentioned involved in assisting the governments against NATO crimes ?
 
. .
Putin's response to this will be quite interesting.

Exactly what I was trying to say. The next 6 months should show if we will see if we live in a unipolar world or multi polar world

^^ That is on paper Aryan_B, in real life politics are those countries you mentioned involved in assisting the governments against NATO crimes ?

I hear what you have to say. But we are coming to a time now that if China Russia let Syria and then Iran fall certainly Pakistan will be next.

They will have achieved complete dominance and they will in due course cross their red lines at will. So lets see.
 
.
I don't know how you guys are supporting that criminal Al Assad. I'm not with any foreign intervention at all, and I know that Bashar Al Assad is a president who isn't pro-western, but that doesn't give him the right to commit those horrible crimes!
Stop saying they are terrorists, they are units who defected from the Syrian army. That means that there were Al Qaeda units in the Syrian army, if those who are against the regime are truly terrorists.
Had Al Assad not committed those horrible crimes and listened to his people and their demands, we wouldn't have seen such blood.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom