What's new

US plan against IS includes Pak-Afghan region

Devil Soul

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
22,931
Reaction score
45
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Alliance of convenience among terror outfits in Pakistan matter of concern for US: Gen Nicholson
By News Desk
Published: March 1, 2017
8SHARES
SHARE TWEET
1342048-afp-1488342369-941-640x480.jpg

Lieutenant General John Nicholson. PHOTO: AFP

A top American general in Afghanistan has said the alliances of convenience among terrorist networks in Afghanistan, Pakistan and other nations is a matter of grave concern for US.

“Al Qaeda is linked to the Taliban, who are not a designated terrorist organisation but a violent extremist organisation and the Taliban provide a medium for designated terrorist organisations like the Haqqani network, Lashkar-e-Taiba, and AQIS. These five form a loose sort of confederation that complement one another and work together,” General John Nicholson, Commander of US and NATO forces in Afghanistan, told a publication of the Combating Terrorism Centre, an academic institution at the US Military Academy in West Point.

Pakistan plays down US commander’s remarks

The Islamic State, the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU) and Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) have also formed a loose configuration. “So we see these alliances of convenience or where they have complementary goals come together. This is one of our big concerns,” he said. Responding to a question, Nicholson said al Qaeda and the Islamic State have transnational ambitions.

“They have ambitions against the US homeland and the homelands of our allies. So that’s why they’re at the top of the list. The others obviously concern us as well. Many of them have regional ambitions,” he said.

“For example, al Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent (AQIS) attacks regionally. The Haqqani network goes back and forth. We have the IRGC [Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps] Quds Forces operating inside Afghanistan, supporting the Taliban. Many of these groups are based in Pakistan, and then some of them fight in Afghanistan. Jaish-e-Mohammed, Lashkar-e-Taiba — we find these operatives showing up in Afghanistan, and so this is the convergence,” Nicholson said.

As a result, the US has developed a regional agenda to combat terrorism, he said.

Trump’s defence aide lauds Pakistan’s resilience in terror fight

A Pentagon-led preliminary plan to defeat the IS has been delivered to the White House and US Defense Secretary Jim (James) Mattis has briefed senior administration officials, a Defense Department spokesperson told reporters, according to Reuters.

Pentagon spokesman Captain Jeff Davis told reporters that it was the framework for a broader plan and looked at the IS around the world, not just Iraq and Syria.

Davis said the plan would define what defeating the IS meant and was one that would ‘rapidly’ defeat the militant group.

He added that Mattis would discuss the plan, which is primarily a written one with accompanying graphics, with members of the Cabinet-level Principals Committee.

US-Pakistan relations: some inconvenient truths

The review of US strategy comes at a decisive moment in the US-led coalition effort against the IS in both Iraq and Syria, and could lead to relaxing some of the former President, Barack Obama, administration’s policy restrictions, like limits on troop numbers. The Donald Trump administration has said defeating “radical terror groups” is among its top foreign policy goals.

The Baghdad-based US commander on the ground, Army Lieutenant General Stephen Townsend, has said he believed US-backed forces would recapture both of the IS’ major strongholds, the cities of Mosul in Iraq and Raqqa in Syria, within the next six months.

Iraqi forces expect a fierce battle against the ISIS to retake Mosul.

In Syria, the US must soon decide whether to arm Syrian Kurdish YPG fighters, despite objections from NATO ally Turkey, which brands the militia group as terrorists.

The US military-led review includes input from Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, as well as from the Treasury Department and the US intelligence community.

Lessons for Pakistan from the US: Democracy only works if you participate

Davis said in addition to diplomacy, the plan would include a military framework that built on capabilities and goals on the battlefield.

Experts have said the Pentagon could request additional forces, beyond the less than 6,000 US troops now deployed to both Iraq and Syria, helping the US military go farther and do more in the fight.

They also said the Pentagon might focus on smaller-scale options like increasing the number of attack helicopters and air strikes as well as bringing in more artillery. The military may also seek more authority to make battlefield decisions.

With additional input from Reuters.
 
.
US plan against IS includes Pak-Afghan region
ANWAR IQBAL — UPDATED about 3 hours ago
WHATSAPP
TTP provides core fighting group for IS: US general

Talking to a publication of the Combating Terrorism Centre, an academic institution at the US Military Academy in West Point, Gen Nicholson outlined how Al Qaeda, the IS and other militant groups worked together in the Pak-Afghan region.

“Al Qaeda is linked to the Taliban, who are not a designated terrorist organisation but a violent extremist organisation, and the Taliban provide a medium for designated terrorist organisations like the Haqqani network, Lashkar-e-Taiba and AQIS. These five form a loose sort of confederation that complement one another and work together,” he said.

The general pointed out that the IS, the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan and the banned Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan had also formed a loose configuration. “So, we see these alliances of convenience or where they have complementary goals come together. This is one of our big concerns,” he said.

At the Pentagon, officials told various media outlets that these ground realities were part of the comprehensive plan they had submitted to the White House.

“It is a broad plan that’s global in scope and not just military, [and] it is not just Iraq and Syria.” An official told CNBC.

Pentagon spokesman Navy Capt Jeff Davis told a news briefing that this was “a plan to rapidly defeat ISIS,” but he stressed that this was a preliminary plan whose details would not be released to allow for continued discussion and to avoid giving the enemy forewarning.

The plan called for the involvement of “all elements of national power” in a “trans-regional approach”, he added.

“Diplomacy is a key part of the plan” that was focused on the IS but was also shaped to include other “trans-regional” terrorist groups, the spokesman said. “This is really a framework for broader discussion.”

During the 2016 election campaign, President Donald Trump had pledged that if elected he would order a 30-day review on accelerated action to eliminate the IS as a threat.

On Jan 27, President Trump went to the Pentagon to sign an executive order asking Mr Mattis to draw up the plan within 30 days.

At the White House, Mr Mattis outlined the plan to the ‘Principals Committee’ of the National Security Council, led by the new National Security Adviser, Lt Gen H.R. McMaster. The committee includes White House chief strategist Steve Bannon and other senior Trump advisers.

Lt Gen McMaster also received a preliminary briefing on the plan on Friday.

Although the Obama administration was strongly against inducting more troops into battles against the IS, President Trump’s officials have indicated that the new plan would involve US soldiers moving closer to the front lines while still avoiding ground combat.

President Trump wants to set up “safe zones” for refugees in Syria, which would require large numbers of US troops to police and protect them, but it was not clear if the Mattis plan included those.

However, Army Gen Joseph Votel, commander of the US Central Command, told reporters last week that the United States might provide artillery support to the US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces now closing on the IS stronghold of Raqqa.

And US Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen Joseph Dunford said earlier this week that the United States could continue to stay in Iraq after eliminating the last IS stronghold in Mosul.

“We have, as has Nato, begun a dialogue about a long-term commitment to grow the capacity, maintain the capacity of Iraqi security forces, but no decisions have been made yet.”

Published in Dawn, March 1st, 2017

WHATSAPP
EMAIL
 
.
Still blind to facts. No wonder USA is badly losing in Afghanistan.
 
.
US plan is only to destroy countries completely like Iraq & install dogs to destroy the country even more.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom