What's new

US Navy says China’s military buildup won’t stop patrols

Shahzaz ud din

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 12, 2017
Messages
7,877
Reaction score
14
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
US Navy says China’s military buildup won’t stop patrols
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS | Published — Sunday 18 February 2018
1105376-1956440035.jpg

ABOARD USS CARL VINSON, Philippines: US forces are undeterred by China’s military buildup on man-made islands in the South China Sea and will continue patrolling the strategic, disputed waters wherever “international law allows us,” said a Navy officer aboard a mammoth US aircraft carrier brimming with F-18 fighter jets.
Lt. Cmdr. Tim Hawkins told The Associated Press on board the USS Carl Vinson that the Navy has carried out routine patrols at sea and in the air in the region for 70 years to promote security and guarantee the unimpeded flow of trade that’s crucial for Asian and US economies.
“International law allows us to operate here, allows us to fly here, allows us to train here, allows us to sail here, and that’s what we’re doing and we’re going to continue to do that,” Hawkins said Saturday on the flight deck of the 95,000-ton warship, which anchored at Manila Bay while on a visit to the Philippines.
When President Donald Trump came to power, Southeast Asian officials were uncertain how deep the US would get involved in the overlapping territorial claims involving China and its Southeast Asian neighbors. Trump’s predecessor, Barack Obama, was a vocal critic of China’s increasingly aggressive actions, including the construction of seven man-made islands equipped with troops, hangers, radar and missile stations and three long runways.
China claims the South China Sea almost in its entirety and has challenged the US naval supremacy in the western Pacific.
“We’re committed,” Hawkins told reporters. “We’re here.”
The Trump administration has outlined a new security strategy that emphasized countering China’s rise and reinforcing the US presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where Beijing and Washington have accused each other of stoking a dangerous military buildup and fought for wider influence.
Washington stakes no claims in the disputes but has declared that their peaceful resolution and the maintenance of freedom of navigation are in its national interest. US officials have said American warships will continue sailing close to Chinese-occupied features without prior notice, placing Washington in a continuing collision course with China’s interests.
In January, China accused the US of trespassing when the US guided missile destroyer USS Hopper sailed near the Chinese-guarded Scarborough Shoal, which Beijing wrestled from the Philippines in 2012, despite its proximity to the main northern island of Luzon. After voicing a strong protest, China said it would take “necessary measures” to protect its sovereignty.
The nuclear-powered Carl Vinson patrolled the sea prior to its Manila visit but did not conduct a freedom of navigation operation, Hawkins said. “That’s not to say that we won’t or we can’t, but we have not, up to this point,” he said.
There are reports that the Carl Vinson will also make a port call in Danang in Vietnam — another critical rival of China’s ambitions in the South China Sea — as the first American aircraft carrier since the Vietnam War ended in 1975, but Hawkins declined to provide details of future trips.
China has also opposed the Philippine military’s deployment of a Japanese-donated Beechcraft King Air patrol plane in late January to Scarborough, a Philippine official said on condition of anonymity because of a lack of authority to discuss the issue publicly. Chinese officials have relayed their objection to their Philippine counterparts, the official said.
China and Japan have their own territorial rifts in the East China Sea.
There was no immediate comment from Philippine military officials about China’s opposition to the surveillance flights at Scarborough.
US and Chinese officials have said they have no intention of going to war in the disputed sea, but their governments have projected their firepower and clout in a delicate play of gunboat diplomacy and deterrence.
“We’re prepared to conduct a spectrum of operations, whether that’s providing humanitarian assistance, disaster relief in the time of an emergency, or whether we have to conduct operations that require us to send strike fighters ashore,” Hawkins said. “We don’t have to use that spectrum, but we’re ready to, in case we need to.”
The US Navy invited journalists Saturday on board the 35-year-old Carl Vinson, which was packed with 72 aircraft, including F-18 Hornets, helicopters and surveillance aircraft.
President Rodrigo Duterte has tried to back down from what he said was a Philippine foreign policy that was steeply oriented toward the US, but has allowed considerable engagements with his country’s treaty ally to continue while reviving once-frosty ties with China in a bid to bolster trade and gain infrastructure funds.
China, the Philippines, Vietnam, Taiwan, Malaysia and Brunei have long contested ownership of the South China Sea, where a bulk of the trade and oil that fuel Asia’s bullish economies passes through.
 
They don't want to control free navigation of the world but India wanted to control free navigation of indian ocean @neem456
Did we ever issue such a statement ?
Are we building artificial islands ?
Do we draw fictitious dash lines on maps claiming to be ours ?
 
Did we ever issue such a statement ?
Are we building artificial islands ?
Do we draw fictitious dash lines on maps claiming to be ours ?
Or if they build bases around the wold oceans so what is india's problem every superpowers have naval bases around the world oceans like USA France UK etc etc

Sea and oceans have different sets of international rules ? Please elaborate then.
You have no answer for me and I'm geography student in USA and i know better than you the difference between seas and oceans and tell me if where is the Chinese naval bases in other parts of the world other than a South China seao_O
 
All those buildups and still cannot stop the free navigation of world, must be depressing fir chineese

Our build up is not meant to stop the freedom of navigation, nor US can stop any nations the freedom of navigation despite they buildups around the world, same can be said about India you guys can't prevent China from have freedom of navigation in Indian Ocean despite your claim it as Indian's Ocean, and yes talk about how depress India is when we docked our sub in Sri Lanka...LMAO
 
Our build up is not meant to stop the freedom of navigation, nor US can stop any nations the freedom of navigation despite they buildups around the world, same can be said about India you guys can't prevent China from have freedom of navigation in Indian Ocean despite your claim it as Indian's Ocean, and yes talk about how depress India is when we docked our sub in Sri Lanka...LMAO
Our navy docks around vietnam, japan, and with lemoa at all american bases.
And you feel the need to beat your chest for puny submarine docking at sri lanka ? lolz

Or if they build bases around the wold oceans so what is india's problem every superpowers have naval bases around the world oceans like USA France UK etc etc


You have no answer for me and I'm geography student in USA and i know better than you the difference between seas and oceans and tell me if where is the Chinese naval bases in other parts of the world other than a South China seao_O
You say you are geography student but you fail to understand difference between owning a natural island and building a artificial island in international water.
Since you are a student learn more about it, and only then reply back.
 
You say you are geography student but you fail to understand difference between owning a natural island and building a artificial island in international water.
Since you are a student learn more about it, and only then reply back.
They claim South China sea for their part not whole Pacific ocean:hitwall: such you claiming whole Indian ocean as your part:blah: you do read geopolitics then reply:crazy::blah:
 
wherever “international law allows us,”
More like "illegaly attacking paralized Iraq without UN resolution while Iraq was still trying to peacefully resolve the (as it turned out correctly) completely fabricated and false accussations by the U.S. and its close allies"-"within international law" or more like "illegaly occupying Syrian soil to back up terrorists and destabilize another sovereign nation"-"within international law"?
 
A few years ago they wanted to stop our island base building. A couple of years ago they wanted to stop our deploying fighter jets on the island bases. Now they are content to sail around harmlessly and we are content to watch them with overwhelming firepower.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom