What's new

US naval interest in Bangladesh

BanglaBhoot

RETIRED TTA
Joined
Apr 8, 2007
Messages
8,839
Reaction score
5
Country
France
Location
France
US secretary of Navy Ray Mabus paid a 'silent' but significant visit to Dhaka. There are two aspects regarding the media attention to this news -- one, this visit got less attention than it actually deserved and then, it got better attention in foreign news agencies than the news agencies of Bangladesh. On the contrary, this visit has a huge significance if we consider the developments that have been taking place in South Asia and in South East Asia for last few months. Almost a month before a news jolted the ministry of foreign affairs in Bangladesh. This news was regarding harbouring of US Seventh Fleet in Chittagong. An Indian news agency claimed that the US had proposed Bangladesh to harbour its Seventh Fleet in Chittagong. But Bangladesh completely refuted the claim. Now, how should this visit be taken in the backdrop of such complex developments?

Let's have some glimpses of the last visit paid by the US secretary of Navy. An eight-member US delegation, led by Ray Mobus, called on Chief of Naval Staff Vice Admiral Zahir Uddin Ahmed and later on the Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. During the meeting with the Vice Admiral they exchanged pleasantries and discussed matters on professional interest. Acquiring warship and ultra modern ocean survey ship from USA and assistance in the field of professional training also came up in the discussion. Sheikh Hasina said her government wants the Bangladesh Navy to extract marine resources following the judgment on maritime dispute over Myanmar. The prime minister also stressed the need for strengthening cooperation between the naval forces of Bangladesh and US. Mobus also laid emphasis on strengthening cooperation between the naval forces of Bangladesh and US. Was there any other agenda behind the façade of formalities?

Bangladesh's location in the basin of Bay of Bengal gives it a much weight to be an important country in the region. Bay is the largest bay in the world which forms the northeastern part of the Indian Ocean. The maritime region in the Bay of Bengal encompassing the countries around the littoral of the Bay, always maintained a thriving contact through the movement of trade, people, religious, cultural and political missions, which gave the region a unique character. Since it is known that in a historic victory at the UN maritime tribunal, Bangladesh has won territorial and economic rights to the vast Bay of Bengal resources even beyond it bargained for. This achievement has given Bangladesh an upper hand to strengthen its position strategically, economically, to some extent, politically in South Asia and in a broader sense in international stage. The Bay of Bengal is more significant in regards to its location in the Indian Ocean. According to Robert D Kaplan, Indian Ocean will be the centre of global conflicts, because most international business, supply will be conducted through this route. Most important of all, it is in the Indian Ocean that the interests and influence of India, China and the United States are beginning to overlap and intersect. It is here, as Kaplan says, that the 21st century's "global power dynamics will be revealed." According to Kaplan two key players in this region are India and China. India is moving east and west while China to the South. Interestingly these, relatively new political players are making the Indo-Pacific into a heaven of "RealPolitik." And lone Superpower the US is also on a process to shift its focus from the Middle East to this region.

Historically Bay of Bengal was an important route for ancient trade and commerce and this has been continued to till date. The strategic interest of global powers has added some new dimensions to this particular region. More importantly the government of Bangladesh is now considering the urgency of securing the Bay of Bengal to secure the national interest there. The natural resources, i.e. petroleum carbon, marine fisheries of the Bay of Bengal are component of future economic development of Bangladesh. Frequently we find in national dailies reporting that infiltration of foreign fishermen is illegally taking place within the jurisdiction of Bangladesh. And Bangladeshi coast guards are helpless as they couldn't reach deep water with their age old boats to chase the infiltrators.. Though lately, but still something to be optimistic about that the government of Bangladesh has taken some initiatives to modernise its Navy. The Government of Bangladesh announced an ambitious defense procurement plan in February 2009 for a major purchase of weaponry, equipment and hardware for its armed forces, including anti-tank and anti-ship missile systems, aircraft for maritime patrol, frigates, tanks and helicopters to turn the force into a 'three dimensional force.'

The US will find it viable to join the process of modernisation of Bangladesh Navy by providing it with training, selling their 'outmoded' equipment and forging relationship to a new height. This will help the US Navy to come closer to Bangladesh Navy. To get an upper hand in the Indian Ocean Bangladesh is a good option just after India. There is already a bonhomie relationship between India and Bangladesh and no exception, concerning India and the US. Therefore, India also won't mind to bring Bangladesh into the 'circle' of 'friends.' India and the US would like to see Bangladesh out of 'string of pearls.' From the Bangladesh's point of view this is a good development to get some 'big friends' besides and enjoy some benefits. In near future, probably Bangladesh will continue to receive more foreign high-ups. But at the same time it has to be very much conscious while dealing them. There has to be a policy of balancing. Tilting towards a particular country would be a blunder. So, in conclusion it can be said that a 'tricky' and testing time ahead for foreign policy decision makers in Bangladesh and we can only wish that they will prove their 'character' for Bangladesh's national interest.

US naval interest in Bangladesh
 
There has to be a policy of balancing. Tilting towards a particular country would be a blunder

Can't agree with this part. Being a small country we either have to be in the chinese or US camp. Taking sides is in our national interest but the question is which side is in favor of our national interest. Its definitely not the yankis.
 
Can't agree with this part. Being a small country we either have to be in the chinese or US camp. Taking sides is in our national interest but the question is which side is in favor of our national interest. Its definitely not the yankis.

Actually that statement is very true for our country. We cannot take sides as of yet. We must swing back and forth between china and america. If we either take sides completely with china or america, it will have huge ramifications for both our military and economy

We may show some favouritism towards one, but we must develop close relations with both countries.
 
Sway between the US and Chinese but keep the Indians out ......

You **have** a maritime boundary from Indias blessings. Pray, how will you keep them out. You are in our backyard and consequently at our mercy. It will take one destroyer to impose blockade on BD. So tell me, how do you plan to keep Indian influence out? :)
 
Sway between the US and Chinese but keep the Indians out ......
You can't keep India out with U.S being at your ports. Funniest thing would be china getting irritated over U.S presence on bangladeshi soil. China will become uninterested in bangladesh in a long run if U.S is anywhere near this sphere. Thats win win for India and U.S.

In the end you don't represent the common bangladeshi's view and you would just grow old, stay pissed at India, you would learn to accept it and swallow your pride eventually.
 
Sway between the US and Chinese but keep the Indians out ......

It's in our best interest to keep India pacified - i.e. keeping them on the edge but not pushing them over. In the long run, all small countries need to side with some global power for protection against regional powers. But I like the idea of swaying between the US and the Chinese without pissing either off.
 
America's bigger concern is China and Bangladesh need to counter India with China. Seems like a very peculiar situation.
 
It's in our best interest to keep India pacified - i.e. keeping them on the edge but not pushing them over. In the long run, all small countries need to side with some global power for protection against regional powers. But I like the idea of swaying between the US and the Chinese without pissing either off.

I think majority of Bangladeshis would agree with that. Under any circumstances, there will never be a naval base in Chittagong. Hell, they don't even need it...lolz...
 
It's in our best interest to keep India pacified - i.e. keeping them on the edge but not pushing them over. In the long run, all small countries need to side with some global power for protection against regional powers. But I like the idea of swaying between the US and the Chinese without pissing either off.

For now this is the correct policy.

In the future, 2025-2030 onwards, it will be China all the way.
 
You **have** a maritime boundary from Indias blessings.

Bollywood farts.:blah:

Pray, how will you keep them out.
Just like we have kept you guys out post 75 and apart from some minor hiccups along the way you guys were always out. With a strong navy and proper political maneuvers india can be cut
to size. And yeah don't forget chicken neck for which Dadas in delhi piss in their pants upon every yawn from uncle HU.:lol:

You are in our backyard and consequently at our mercy.

There is no such thing as India's back yard. We are all at Allah(swt)'s mercy.:coffee:

It will take one destroyer to impose blockade on BD.

medium.jpg
 
Keeping India pacified means having out our own people abducted and killed. The AL winning the elections did not stop Pilkhana happening. If keeping India pacified means that 53 army officers and dozens of politicians and businessmen have to be abducted and killed on the orders of RAW then I do not want to pacify India. Let the Chinese and Americans into Bangladesh and see what the Indians can do about it .....
 
It's in our best interest to keep India pacified - i.e. keeping them on the edge but not pushing them over. In the long run, all small countries need to side with some global power for protection against regional powers. But I like the idea of swaying between the US and the Chinese without pissing either off.

Really guys, I am astonished... Talking about swinging with great powers.. I saw, USA, Chine and even India... Where the hell is Russia?? have u guys forgot that such a great country existed?

Keeping India pacified means having out our own people abducted and killed. The AL winning the elections did not stop Pilkhana happening. If keeping India pacified means that 53 army officers and dozens of politicians and businessmen have to be abducted and killed on the orders of RAW then I do not want to pacify India. Let the Chinese and Americans into Bangladesh and see what the Indians can do about it .....

Always the same rant Mr.Munshi.,, But sadly, like everytime, u have no proof, and also the Awami League wins in local elections !! Poor BS !!
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom