What's new

US National Intelligence Council - Global Trends 2030

Rostam

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Dec 31, 2012
Messages
497
Reaction score
0
As revealed by the thread´s title, the US National Intelligence Council has concluded an extensive report on what they believe the global trends might look like in 2030 concerning various economic, social, military and geopolitical spheres.

It’s quite an intensive (160 pages) but inviting read and it will be interesting hearing your thoughts and reflections about it. The report can be downloaded at the following site:

National Intelligence Council - Global Trends

There are also reports available for 2015/2020/2025.

Please use references to the report page if you wish to quote or comment something of relevance.

Here is a very short summary:

GlobalTrends2030.png
 
. . .
Some interesting conclusions from the report summarized by the Guardian:

"There will not be any hegemonic power. Power will shift to networks and coalitions in a multi-polar world.

A collapse or sudden retreat of US power probably would result in an extended period of global anarchy; no leading power would be likely to replace the United States as guarantor of the international order, it says, working on the assumption that the US is a force for stability – a premise open to challenge in Iraq and elsewhere in the Middle East and beyond.

The diffusion of power among countries will have a dramatic impact by 2030. Asia will have surpassed North America and Europe combined in terms of global power, based upon GDP, population size, military spending, and technological investment. China alone will probably have the largest economy, surpassing that of the United States a few years before 2030.

Meanwhile, the economies of Europe, Japan, and Russia are likely to continue their slow relative declines.

The megatrends also point to increased instability because of rising demand for water, food and energy compounded by climate change. Demand for food, water, and energy will grow by approximately 35, 40, and 50% respectively owing to an increase in the global population and the consumption patterns of an expanding middle class.

Among the less predictable but possible game changers identified by the report are the collapse of the euro, a severe pandemic, or a nuclear attack by Pakistan or North Korea. It also says a democratic or collapsed China, or the emergence of a more liberal regime in Iran, could have a significant impact on global stability.

The report warns that a number of countries are at high risk of becoming failed states by 2030, including Afghanistan, Pakistan, Rwanda, Uganda and Burundi. The risk of civil wars and internal conflicts remains high in Africa and the Middle East, but is declining in Latin America.

On the one hand, if the Islamic Republic maintains power in Iran and is able to develop nuclear weapons, the Middle East will face a highly unstable future. On the other hand, the emergence of moderate, democratic governments or a breakthrough agreement to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict could have enormously positive consequences."

China's economy to outgrow America's by 2030 as world faces 'tectonic shift' | World news | guardian.co.uk
 
.
Washington, Dec 10 — Asia will have surpassed North America and Europe combined in terms of global power by 2030 with China, India and Brazil becoming especially important to the global economy, according to a new US intelligence assessment.
"The diffusion of power among countries will have a dramatic impact by 2030," says the fifth instalment in the US National Intelligence Council's series aimed at providing a framework for thinking about the future released here Monday.

The report "Global Trends 2030: Alternative Worlds," released by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the apex body of 16 US intelligence agencies, says China alone will probably have the largest economy, surpassing that of the United States a few years before 2030.

"In a tectonic shift, the health of the global economy increasingly will be linked to how well the developing world does-more so than the traditional West," the report said.

"In addition to China, India, and Brazil, regional players such as Colombia, Indonesia, Nigeria, South Africa, and Turkey will become especially important to the global economy.

"Meanwhile, the economies of Europe, Japan, and Russia are likely to continue their slow relative declines," the report said.
Despite their growing economic clout, developing countries will face their own challenges, especially in their efforts to continue the momentum behind their rapid economic growth, it said.

With slowing growth China "faces the prospect of being trapped in middle-income status, with its per capita income not continuing to increase to the level of the world's advanced economies."

"India faces many of the same problems and traps accompanying rapid growth as China: large inequities between rural and urban sectors and within society; increasing constraints on resources such as water; and a need for greater investment in science and technology to continue to move its economy up the value chain," the report said.

"Insufficient natural resources - such as water and arable land - in many of the same countries that will have disproportionate levels of young men increase the risks of intrastate conflict breaking out, particularly in Sub-Saharan African and South and East Asian countries, including China and India," it said.

"Three different baskets of risks could conspire to increase the chances of an outbreak of interstate conflict: changing calculations of key players- particularly China, India, and Russia; increasing contention over resource issues; and a wider spectrum of more accessible instruments of war."

South Asia, the report said: "faces a series of internal and external shocks during the next 15-20 years. Low growth, rising food prices, and energy shortages will pose stiff challenges to governance in Pakistan and Afghanistan."
"Afghanistan's and Pakistan's youth bulges are large-similar in size to those found in many African countries. When these youth bulges are combined with a slow-growing economy, they portend increased instability."

However, it said, "India is in a better position, benefiting from higher growth, but it will still be challenged to find jobs for its large youth population. Inequality, lack of infrastructure, and education deficiencies are key weaknesses in India."
How the United States' international role evolves during the next 15-20 years was a big uncertainty, the report said.
"Whether the US will be able to work with new partners to reinvent the international system will be among the most important variables in the future shape of the global order," it said.


Read more: China, India, Brazil to emerge as key global players by 2030: US report - NY Daily News | NewsCred SmartWire
 
.
Dont know bout India or Brazil

But China I can be sure about :tup:

Maybe if India eliminates its 600 million poor.

And Brazil keeps a steady growth rate...
 
.
South Asia, the report said: "faces a series of internal and external shocks during the next 15-20 years. Low growth, rising food prices, and energy shortages will pose stiff challenges to governance in Pakistan and Afghanistan."
"Afghanistan's and Pakistan's youth bulges are large-similar in size to those found in many African countries. When these youth bulges are combined with a slow-growing economy, they portend increased instability."
[/url]
Serious problems ahead for Pakistan .
Agreed that south asia faces some serious damage within the next 15-20 years but what did they mean by saying " Afghanistan's and Pakistan's youth bulges are large-similar in size to those found in many African countries. " ?
Emm.....Economically right !
 
.
Dont know bout India or Brazil

But China I can be sure about :tup:

Maybe if India eliminates its 600 million poor.

And Brazil keeps a steady growth rate...

What is the population of Brazil mate ?
Near about 190 million and what is the current middle class structure of India - nearly 350 million people , and this growth story is going to continue .
 
.
Regional Nuclear Powers in the Future Security Environment

By Vipin Narang, Assistant Professor of Political Science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and a member of its Security Studies Program.

The world is sliding toward a second nuclear age, one whose character will be dominated by regional nuclear powers with conflicting interests rather than by the United States or Russia. Regional nuclear powers such as India, Israel, Pakistan, North Korea, potentially Iran and others that might follow face different challenges in managing their nuclear forces than the superpowers. They have tighter resource constraints, often unstable domestic politics or even internal conflict, and hostile regional security environments. Some are forced to extract significant deterrent power from much smaller arsenals, which can strain command and control organs.

Some like India and China are content to rely on nuclear weapons to deter strictly nuclear use, and therefore have the luxury of adopting no first use clauses and relatively assertive command and control structures that privilege arsenal security. These nuclear powers have a nuclear strategy best described as “assured retaliation,” and they are able to select it because of advantageous geographic buffers and strong conventional forces that obviate the need to rely on nuclear weapons as warfighting tools.

Others, like Pakistan and perhaps several emerging nuclear states in the next two decades, are not so lucky. Nuclear states that face a conventionally superior adversary are often tempted to adopt more aggressive first use postures that threaten nuclear use in a conventional conflict—as NATO did during the Cold War. With sometimes unstable regimes and internal threats, regional powers that adopt such a posture risk not only the intentional use of nuclear weapons in a conflict, but nuclear accidents and more disturbingly of course, nuclear terrorism.

It is an open question as to what type of nuclear posture future regional nuclear powers such as Iran, and others that might follow, will adopt. There are reasons to think Iran might look more like India or China, trying to deter nuclear use and an existential threat to the regime’s existence. But there are also reasons to think, particularly given the structure of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps, that Iran might go down the path of Pakistan and adopt a first use nuclear posture to deter even limited conventional threats from its adversaries. Keeping a close eye on not only which states pursue nuclear weapons, but also which nuclear postures they adopt, will be a critical determinant of stability or instability in the Middle East, South Asia, and East Asia.

What is certainly clear is that the emergence of a potential cascade of nuclear powers across Asia—from west to east—carries with it significant challenges that we have not yet faced. First, the number of potential nuclear powers that border each other, with historical territorial disputes and irredentist claims, is a novel challenge. The risk of armed conflict, checkerboard nuclear alliances (e.g., persistent rumors about Saudi-Pakistani nuclear connections), and catastrophic misperceptions are all heightened in such a multipolar nuclear landscape. Second, for the most part, the Cold War competition settled into a pattern where both the United States and the Soviet Union had an interest in largely preserving the status quo. Some new nuclear states across Asia may view nuclear weapons as an instrument to revise the status quo—that is for deterrence as well as offense or compellence, despite the historical difficulty of the latter. We have already seen some of the effects of this in South Asia, where Pakistan has more aggressively employed state-based terrorist organizations to attack metropolitan India, using its first use posture as a shield behind which it can act against its conventionally superior neighbor.

What role can the United States play as these dynamics unfold over the next two decades? Can a broader US extended deterrent to Middle East allies who might be tempted to proliferate stanch the cascade of proliferation? There are two reasons to think that this might be difficult. First, states such as, hypothetically, Saudi Arabia might prefer to have their own sovereign deterrent against a future nuclear Iran rather than outsourcing it to the United States. Second, the risk that a broader US extended deterrent might generate “reckless allies” that might drag the United States into conflicts would be a serious concern. Broader nonproliferation and counter-proliferation efforts might slow the emergence of this landscape, but it has historically been very difficult to stop determined states from acquiring nuclear capabilities.

Realistically, the best hope the United States probably has in managing this emerging nuclear landscape is to stay engaged across Asia to help ensure that small disputes do not escalate to armed conflict between nuclear powers. It may also be time to revisit export control laws that prohibit the sharing of negative control technologies and best practices that might help secure the arsenals of new nuclear states. In the new landscape, with nuclear weapons dispersed across unstable states, a premium ought to be put on ensuring that those weapons are as secure as possible.

Regional Nuclear Powers in the Future Security Environment | Global Trends 2030
 
.
What is the population of Brazil mate ?
Near about 190 million and what is the current middle class structure of India - nearly 350 million people , and this growth story is going to continue .

Actually we cannot go by GOI's statistics.

GOI says anyone who earns above rs.20 is middle class. We must go buy international standards.

Going by that, 50% of India earns below $1.25.
20% earns a little above $1.25
25% earns as much as a average American does.
5% are the millionares and billionares.

So you see, India does not have a average wealth. The per capita is as well inflated.
 
.
Sepas Rostam.

DLesh kardam vaght kardam bekhoonamesh.
 
. . . .
Khahesh mikonam dash mashti..rahat baash.



Agha in gorbeye perseret ba in hame ra raftanesh hanooz ziyadi topol mopol khodesho neshon mide...

are bayad bebaramesh pishe doctore taghzie ... treadmill javab nemide ...
 
.
Back
Top Bottom