Do your own research. You long ago confessed this stuff is meant to serve as a blinder to India's faults. You're only screwing yourself and your country now, not I or mine.
It's been a while but your India's leaders have certainly done this in the past. And just about every time the "Non-Aligned Movement" meets as well.
You have not yet given answers to these questions ?
either you are suffering from dyslexia or dementia or you are hypocrite to bypass these pertinent questions ?
I am posting you again for your information .
what about When US diplomat Russel howard who raped their Ethiopian maid repeatedly .... ?
what about US consul general at Naples - Donald Moore who had turned Consul office into a Sex-parlour ...? why he was sneaked away by US state department.
what about Chuck Lisenbee, a former State Department Beirut security officer was found to be involved in multiple episodes of sexual assaults on male security guards ... why he was rewarded with position of special agent in Washington for the Office of Diplomatic Vehicles ...?
when U.S. Ambassador to Belgium Howard Gutman was found to be guilty of seeking “sexual favors from both prostitutes and minor children " ... why he was allowed to retire honourably ... ?
what about US diplomat to Japan Mr Thurmond Borden who had made false contract with his Phillipino maid to deceive Japanese immigration authorities ? ....when the maid spilled the beans ....US state department claimed diplomatic immunity ...
why did not US government waived off his diplomatic immunity ?
It is easy to preach others ...
But US has penchant to preach others what it itself does not follow !
Before exhorting others US should set its own house in order ...
Those who live in house of glass should not throw stones at other person's houses ....
As I pointed out, it's just like a defendant in a courtroom claiming he shouldn't be prosecuted for his crime because he claims some other injustice exists somewhere else that wasn't taken care of, so he should walk free.
Start a separate thread and I'll reply there. If you're polite, that is.
For now, the conversation between us has reached an impasse; you're unwilling to address the criminality of your country's diplomatic corps, and I'm unwilling to let go of the fact that this is your personal choice, and by doing so India as a nation is much worse off.
Why you insist on different thread ?
what keeps you away from answering these questions in this thread ?
Yes the impasse will stay until you yield !
As I pointed out, it's just like a defendant in a courtroom claiming he shouldn't be prosecuted for his crime because he claims some other injustice exists somewhere else that wasn't taken care of, so he should walk free.
Yes . the defendant has right to claim in courtroom that he should not be prosecuted for his crime if the person who sits to judge him , himself has been indicted of those crimes number of times and has managed to get off scot free despite those indictments !!!
Do you understand the full essence of metaphor you have been constantly throwing at me ???