US is planning to surround Egypt!

[PakistaniandProud]

U.S. sends marines, warships to Libya after attack kills U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, 3 others

The US is sending warships to Libya after the US ambassador and four other Americans have died at the hands of a Libyan Mob (who many believe that it was a setup by the US anyways).

Imran Hussein is a Muslim scholar who had predicted the Arab revolution in 2003, and in 2011/12 recently he has stated that Israel, America and NATO are planning to surround Egypt. Egypt is already surrounded by Israel itself to the east, Italy/NATO in the North, Northwest, and now Libya to the west.

You may dub this as a conspiracy, but all this is part of a bigger game.

 

[Syrian Lion]

I'm sure this is all planned by the U.S, so the U.S can have "legit" excuse to invade Libya somehow, either by opening a base and etc... how can bunch of people with Ak-47 kills an American ambassador, where are the SEAL and Marines guards??

 

[Thorn]

Exactly what the US wanted in the first place,just because 1 ambassador dies,you go and invade that country

 

[gambit]

I'm sure this is all planned by the U.S, so the U.S can have "legit" excuse to invade Libya somehow, either by opening a base and etc... how can bunch of people with Ak-47 kills an American ambassador, where are the SEAL and Marines guards??

How could 'Daffy got overthrown? Where were his elite female guards?

 

[Syrian Lion]

How could 'Daffy got overthrown? Where were his elite female guards?

Qaddafi had NATO, USA and bunch of terrorists fighting him , so I can't see Gaddafi taking over the world when the west is against him.........

Exactly what the US wanted in the first place,just because 1 ambassador dies,you go and invade that country

It's allowed, an attack on embassy is an attack on that country, so how about killing the ambassador? The U.S wants a "legit" reason to invade or take over a country, because they failed in Iraq, now they actually came up with a "legit" reason....

 

[gambit]

Qaddafi had NATO, USA and bunch of terrorists fighting him , so I can't see Gaddafi taking over the world when the west is against him.........

Am using the same logic as you were. Every leader have bodyguards, usually well trained and armed. So where were Daffy's bodyguards? Where were Mubarak's? Where were Saddam's?

It's allowed, an attack on embassy is an attack on that country, so how about killing the ambassador? The U.S wants a "legit" reason to invade or take over a country, because they failed in Iraq, now they actually came up with a "legit" reason....

And guess who did the killing?

 

[Syrian Lion]

Am using the same logic as you were. Every leader have bodyguards, usually well trained and armed. So where were Daffy's bodyguards? Where were Mubarak's? Where were Saddam's?


And guess who did the killing?

Dude, you kidding me?? I said half of the world killed Gaddafi, and about Couple of terrorists ONLY FEW, maybe less then 10 broke through the SEAL Team and the Marines, and reached the ambassador.......

the killing was done by the people you fed with democracy

 

[RayKalm]

This is the first thing that popped up in mind when watching all this on the news.

I even remember Wolf Blizter from CNN stating that they should kill the mob who attacked the ambassadors with drones, because they were 'terrorists'.

This is indeed all part of a very big plan. Egypt may be it's next target.

 

[gambit]

Dude, you kidding me?? I said half of the world killed Gaddafi, and about Couple of terrorists ONLY FEW, maybe less then 10 broke through the SEAL Team and the Marines, and reached the ambassador.......

the killing was done by the people you fed with democracy

SEALs are not stationed at embassies.

 

[Leader]

Can somebody just spread the rumour "Syria has Oil" then you will see a country with wheat and a dictator Asad the butcher is surrounded and invaded by the amrikeez...

 

[Syrian Lion]

SEALs are not stationed at embassies.

okay no seal team, what about HIGHLY TRAINED GUARDS?? i thought the U.S was good at this stuff?? and were there marines??
or the U.S is only good at killing innocent people with drones??

 

[gambit]

Can somebody just spread the rumour "Syria has Oil" then you will see a country with wheat and a dictator Asad the butcher is surrounded and invaded by the amrikeez...

No need for rumors. We already knew.

okay no seal team, what about HIGHLY TRAINED GUARDS?? i thought the U.S was good at this stuff?? and were there marines??
or the U.S is only good at killing innocent people with drones??

How about the host country's responsibility to protect guests?

You are not a very smart and educated fella, ain't you?

 

[Syrian Lion]

Can somebody just spread the rumour "Syria has Oil" then you will see a country with wheat and a dictator Asad the butcher is surrounded and invaded by the amrikeez...

you are a sick person, asking for war and blood shed... can't you see your own people suffering that you want others to suffer from Americans.....

May God Heal you...

No need for rumors. We already knew.


How about the host country's responsibility to protect guests?

Host country?? there is no legit Army in Libya after Gaddafi, NATO destroyed Libya, that there is only tribes now with guns, and everyday at least 10 Libyans die, but the media hides it to hide the NATO failure...

 

[Thorn]

How about the host country's responsibility to protect guests?

it was just this 1 guest who got killed,get over it now

 

[gambit]

Host country?? there is no legit Army in Libya after Gaddafi, NATO destroyed Libya, that there is only tribes now with guns, and everyday at least 10 Libyans die, but the media hides it to hide the NATO failure...

Libya is the host country. If an ambassador met with the new leader after a 'regime change', it mean the guest country conceded there is a new leader. If the new leader/government approve the stationing of an ambassador, that mean his country incur the burden of protecting his guest(s).

It looks like you are woefully ignorant of even basic political science.