China doesn't use Russian doctrine and never has, so there won't be a repeat of what's happening in Europe.
Most of PLA's original commanders, including Zhou Enlai, Lin Biao and Liu Bocheng, were either trained by the KMT or were even KMT military instructors (Zhou Enlai). The entire CPC came from the left wing of the KMT and the bulk of junior officers were KMT defectors.
the KMT pre-WW2 was trained according to domestic Chinese doctrine, which combined domestic ideas with imports from Imperial Japan, Germany and pre-WW2 Soviet Union (which was very different than WW2 and after Soviet Union). PLA then added to KMT ideas with direct Imperial Japanese imports (captured Japanese soldiers in Manchuria) and its own history as a light infantry component of the KMT army.
At no point did PLA ever import Russian doctrine. After 1949, China was very arrogant and never allowed Soviet military to do anything other than tech transfers. Even with tech transfers, everything was customized and localized for Chinese requirements.
Only after WW2 did KMT and CPC military doctrine diverge, with KMT going with US doctrine and PLA using the traditional doctrine which is based on original KMT and Imperial Japanese ideas. You can even see it with Mao's People's War philosophy, which emphasized morale, light infantry and skirmishing... all aspects of KMT and Japanese doctrine, not Russian, which completely discounts morale and cares mostly about tanks and artillery, not infantry.