What's new

US general says ties with Pakistan fundamental to US interests

Devil Soul

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
22,931
Reaction score
45
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
The nominee for the position of US Joint Chiefs of Staff General Joseph Dunford has said at his Senate confirmation hearing that the relationship with Pakistan is fundamental to the US’ vital national security interests.

General Joseph Dunford said the US will need to continue cooperation with Pakistan to defeat al Qaeda, support Pakistan’s stability, and achieve a lasting peace in Afghanistan. He said that Pakistan has cooperated with the US in its operations against al Qaeda and other terrorist organisations.

Appreciating Pakistan Army’s role in the war against terrorism, Dunford, currently the commandant of the US Marine Corps, told senators that Pakistan provided assistance in the war against Al Qaeda and other militant groups.

The general said that Pakistan’s actions in North Waziristan and other areas of western Pakistan have disrupted groups that are a threat to US personnel and objectives in Afghanistan.

“We will continue to work with Pakistan to do more,” he said.

Joseph Dunford told the Senate Armed Services Committee that the US and Pakistan have differences on several issues, but asserted that financial and military aid to Islamabad would continue.

“Areas of divergent interest with Pakistan include our views on the use of proxies and the importance of a positive and stable Pakistan-India relationship.”

Dunford said that key US strategic interests in Pakistan are preventing al Qaeda’s resurgence in Afghanistan and Pakistan, to limit its ability to attack America.

He said that Pakistan is fundamental to US’ national security interests

“Pakistan and United States will both be benefitted by restoration of regional peace and eradication of extremism”, General Joseph Dunford said.

Gen Dunford said Russia now poses the greatest threat to US national security and its behavior is “nothing short of alarming”.

It would be “reasonable” to provide lethal weapons to Ukrainian forces battling pro-Russian rebels, he said. But he also said that the Pentagon nevertheless needed to maintain some kind of “effective” military-to-military relationship with Moscow.

He stressed that Russia is a nuclear power that is capable of violating the sovereignty of US allies and doing “things inconsistent with national interests”.

He also cited China, North Korea and the Islamic State (IS) group as threats to US national security.

Ties between former Cold War foes Washington and Moscow have plunged to new lows since Russia annexed Ukraine’s Crimea region last year. Ukrainian forces are still locked in battle with pro-Russian rebels in the separatist east.

“From a military perspective, I think it’s reasonable we provide that support to the Ukrainians,” Dunford said.

Republican Senator John McCain, who chairs the panel, welcomed Dunford’s push for arms. “In Europe, Vladimir Putin’s Russia continues its onslaught in Ukraine,” said McCain
http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/201...es-with-pakistan-fundamental-to-us-interests/
 
. .
Hey General only sweet words can't stop them going into Russian block. You have to offer them some real new stuff. :P
 
. . .
One of the divergent views on part of US pivot to the Pacific is a non threatening Pakistan that accepts India' regional supremacy. That will resolve 2 key objectives, united front against China(containment) and India accepted as a permanent security council member. I do expect a push for these 2 goals in the next administration Hillary or otherwise. Pakistan on its part will have to make a choice accepting the offing or divorce itself from the region and go full throttle towards central Asia and China.
 
.
One of the divergent views on part of US pivot to the Pacific is a non threatening Pakistan that accepts India' regional supremacy. That will resolve 2 key objectives, united front against China(containment) and India accepted as a permanent security council member. I do expect a push for these 2 goals in the next administration Hillary or otherwise. Pakistan on its part will have to make a choice accepting the offing or divorce itself from the region and go full throttle towards central Asia and China.
Go with China and Central Asia until we are needed again. Then we can balance our relations with all sides. It's better to be close to the middle, but this of course will only happen if U.S needs us after they partner with India.
 
.
One of the divergent views on part of US pivot to the Pacific is a non threatening Pakistan that accepts India' regional supremacy. That will resolve 2 key objectives, united front against China(containment) and India accepted as a permanent security council member. I do expect a push for these 2 goals in the next administration Hillary or otherwise. Pakistan on its part will have to make a choice accepting the offing or divorce itself from the region and go full throttle towards central Asia and China.

Traditional US influence and the "enforcement" of this influence is dead and Asia is so thankful for it. We are moving towards a new chapter of equal coexistence, not this warped and convoluted US master-slave relationship.

Pakistan has already ejected US excrement from its system and hopefully with India's inclusion into SCO will make them think long and hard about the so called benefits about this pivot and move back towards neutrality which benefits the region.

If you think US can or wants to assist India with regional dominance then you are very naiive. They have their five eyes and then their useful idiots.
 
.
One of the divergent views on part of US pivot to the Pacific is a non threatening Pakistan that accepts India' regional supremacy. That will resolve 2 key objectives, united front against China(containment) and India accepted as a permanent security council member. I do expect a push for these 2 goals in the next administration Hillary or otherwise. Pakistan on its part will have to make a choice accepting the offing or divorce itself from the region and go full throttle towards central Asia and China.

If our past is any indication, we'll not be joining any anti-China axis no matter what. Recognizing Indian supremacy is out if the question too.

Softening of our national sentiment towards India, which will eventually be translated into state's foreign policy, is contingent upon 'the bottle-neck' : Kashmir. Unless this issue is resolved completely, within some bounds of rationality and mutual-agreement, there's no hope for sustainable peace in the region.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom