What's new

US apology needed to open Nato supply routes or close forever: Khar

VelocuR

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 4, 2009
Messages
6,188
Reaction score
5
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
US apology needed to open Nato supply routes: Khar

389022-khar-1338871712-572-640x480.jpg


WASHINGTON: The United States should apologize for an air raid that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers if it wants Pakistan to reopen key supply routes into Afghanistan, Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar said in an interview published Monday.

Angered over the lethal November attack, Islamabad shut the supply routes vital for US and allied troops, forcing the alliance to rely on longer, more expensive northern routes through Russia and Central Asia.

“A representative parliament of 180 million people has spoken on one subject,” Khar told Foreign Policy, referring to new guidelines for US-Pakistan ties approved by Pakistani lawmakers which call for an apology.

A US apology is “something which should have been forthcoming the day this incident happened, and what a partnership not only demands, but requires,” she said.

The on-again, off-again relationship between Islamabad and Washington is at a new low, and with US elections looming in November, President Barack Obama is unlikely to say sorry to Pakistan and make himself vulnerable to attacks from his Republican challenger, Mitt Romney.

A Nato summit in Chicago ended two weeks ago without a deal on the Nato supply lines.

Khar however said that despite the political challenges, the United States should live up to its principles of doing “what we consider to be right rather than what is more popular.”

She noted that Pakistan also has political obstacles of its own.

“For us in Pakistan… the most popular thing to do right now is to not move on Nato supply routes at all. It is to close them forever,” she said.
:yahoo:

“If I were a political advisor to the prime minister, this is what I would advise him to do. But I’m not advising him to do that… because what is at stake is much more important for Pakistan than just winning an election.”

The roads through Pakistan, now shuttered for over six months, are a crucial logistical link for Nato as it plans a large-scale withdrawal of combat troops and hardware by the end of 2014.

Yet US officials have so far rejected Pakistani proposals to charge steep fees of several thousand dollars for each alliance truck crossing the border.

Khar also criticized Washington’s use of unmanned drones to target militants in Pakistan’s lawless tribal area, a program Obama has accelerated.

“If you are creating 10 more targets for every target you take, are you doing a service or a disservice to your eventual goal of winning the war?” she asked.

Another thorn in the side of the contentious US-Pakistani relationship has been Shakeel Afridi, the Pakistani doctor who helped the CIA find late al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden by running a fake vaccination program, and who was sentenced to 33 years in prison for treason.

“Clearly, my advice at this point is that we don’t need to blow this out of proportion at all,” Khar said. “But I would certainly not want this particular issue to cast a shadow over the relationship.”

The interview was conducted in Doha during the May 29-31 US-Islamic World Forum organized by The Brookings Institution.

http://tribune.com.pk/story/389022/us-apology-needed-to-open-pakistan-supply-routes-khar/

http://dawn.com/2012/06/05/us-apology-needed-to-re-open-supply-routes-khar/

Strong languages by Khar. :tup:
 
.
Just like respect, demanding an apology is self-defeating in itself.

Its merely saving face as one bows to the inevitable.

The world may be polarized on Iran today. But if there is one thing that is shared, it is the respect they won when they shot down the American drone.

No whining. No moralizing. No jalsas. No hai hais. No burning flags. No rock shows. No UN demonstrations. No extracting pounds of flesh over the flesh of compatriots.

Just shoot it down.

And let the US decide how to respond.
 
. .
Pakistan and US allies without trust

ISLAMABAD: As Washington fumed over the jailing of a Pakistani doctor who helped the CIA hunt down Osama bin Laden, an educated Islamabad businesswoman voiced her own outrage – at the United States.“All we ever got from the Americans is instability and violence,” she said, echoing what many Pakistanis believe is Washington’s contribution to their country and region over three decades.

“Didn’t you know Osama bin Laden was a CIA agent?”, she asked at a dinner attended by Western diplomats, referring to his role in US-backed resistance to the Soviet occupation in Afghanistan in the 1980s.

“Then he was on the same side as Washington.”

In Pakistan, public opinion increasingly views the United States as a fickle, selfish ally despite the billions of dollars in aid that flow to the cash-strapped South Asian nation.

It is a view that has only deepened since US troops killed bin Laden on Pakistani soil in May 2011. The raid, kept secret from Pakistani authorities, was a humiliation for the powerful military and raised searching questions about whether it was harbouring militants.

Relations have soured further after a court last week imprisoned for 33 years the Pakistani doctor who helped the CIA find the al Qaeda chief and mastermind of the 9/11 attacks.

“Most people in Washington are upset with Pakistan. Dr (Shakil) Afridi goes to jail, this guy should be a hero, instead you (Pakistan) are treating him like a crook,” said one US official.

Pakistani officials told the media Afridi was jailed for treason for his ties to the CIA, but a court document released later said he was guilty of aiding a banned militant group.

Rising antipathy towards Washington makes it tougher for the government – already unpopular because of its failure to tackle poverty, power cuts and corruption – to do anything that might be seen as caving in to US demands, especially ahead of general elections expected early next year.

Those constraints are evident in deadlocked talks on re-opening supply routes to Western forces in Afghanistan, which Islamabad shut six months ago to protest against a US cross-border air attack that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers.

“As the relationship has deteriorated, public opinion in both countries has become a mirror image of the other, seeing each other almost as adversaries,” Maleeha Lodhi, a former Pakistani ambassador to Washington, told Reuters.

“A great deal of the anti-American sentiment in Pakistan has to do with the destabilising fallout on the country of a decade of the American-led intervention in Afghanistan. American policies are seen as bringing grief to the region, especially Pakistan,” she said.

CIA AGENTS SEEN AS “RAMBOS”


When CIA contractor Raymond Davis killed two Pakistanis in the eastern city of Lahore last year, it opened another wound.

Washington says he acted in self defence.

For many Pakistanis, it was a Rambo-style act by CIA agents who seem to roam their country freely. Davis was acquitted of murder and allowed to leave Pakistan after a $2.3 million payment was made to the men’s families.

“In our homes, the eldest always has the last word. The younger ones can say whatever they like but one slap from the elder brother and they have to shut up,” said Mohammad Imran, owner of a sportswear shop in Pakistan’s commercial hub Karachi.

“America is like the elder brother or father in the house.


Didn’t you see the Raymond Davis case, nobody could touch him, and had to send him off with dignity and respect.”

The main point of friction between Washington and Islamabad is the US “war on terror”, a campaign Pakistan joined after the Sept 11, 2001, attacks on the United States and despite objections from some of its own generals.

But Islamabad has been accused of being less than sincere and of shielding Afghan militant groups to ensure it has a proxy stake in any political settlement once US forces withdraw, an allegation it denies.

Some US senators have pushed for aid cuts to force greater Pakistani cooperation, and the frustrations have spread far beyond the corridors of power in Washington.

Pakistan’s leaders “need to be helping us, not fighting against us”, said Lynne McClintock, an office manager in a physical therapy practice in a Seattle suburb.They need to be giving us any undercover information they have to destroy the Taliban.”

Pakistan sees such comments as a sign of US ingratitude, pointing out that it has sacrificed more than any other country that joined the US war on militancy, losing tens of thousands of security forces and civilians.

All Pakistan gets in return, many officials complain, is criticism and a lack of trust.

Shaking his head in anger, one Pakistani official recalled a visit he made to Nato headquarters in Brussels. When he went to the bathroom, he was escorted by a security guard, making him feel as if he were a threat.


FEARS OF HISTORY REPEATING ITSELF

Hardening the resentment of Pakistanis is a firm belief that it was Washington that fuelled militancy by funding Islamist guerrillas to fight the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, and then by helping topple the Taliban regime in Kabul in 2001.

The latter move forced Taliban and al Qaeda fighters and leaders over the border into Pakistan, creating chaos in what President Barack Obama would later call the world’s most dangerous place.

“America has put a lot of international pressure on Pakistan, especially because of this Taliban business,” said Zubair Khan, who sells jeans and t-shirts.

“We had nothing to do with this war. But ever since 9/11 more people have died here than there (Afghanistan). We paid the price and we suffered.”

Pakistani officials say Americans, and especially their leaders, need to grasp the sensitivities of trying to pacify the region before judging Islamabad’s performance and accused Washington of being naive by relying so much on military offensives to defeat the Taliban.

Many Pakistanis worry, too, the United States will abandon the region again after the 2014 pullout from Afghanistan.

Pakistan, they fear, will be left with a new mess.

Mistrust is so widespread that, even when the United States tries to do good, its efforts are often interpreted as devious.

Sitting near a shelf with books on counter-terrorism, a senior Pakistani security official enthusiastically discussed a book that argued US aircraft deployed in Pakistan in 2010 to help victims of epic floods were actually used for reconnaissance missions ahead of the bin Laden raid.

The suspicion is returned.

On Saturday, an anti-terrorism court in the garrison city of Rawalpindi acquitted four Pakistanis charged with involvement in the botched 2010 Times Square bombing plot.

Reacting to the verdict, New York City Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly said: “It wouldn’t be Pakistan if it ceased to disappoint.”

Pakistan and US allies without trust | DAWN.COM
 
. .
Nato strikes alternate supply route deals through Central Asia

Nato has concluded agreements with Central Asian nations allowing it to evacuate vehicles and other military equipment from Afghanistan and completely bypass Pakistan, which once provided the main supply route for coalition forces.


Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said Monday that Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan had agreed to allow the reverse transport of alliance equipment.

Since Nato already has an agreement with Russia, the deal will allow it to ship back to Europe tens of thousands of vehicles, containers and other items through the overland route when the evacuation picks up pace later this year.

The announcement on Monday appears to indicate that Washington and the allies are now preparing for the possibility that the supply link through Pakistan, said to be about six times cheaper than its northern alternative, may not be reopened at all. It is also likely to put pressure on Pakistan to ease its negotiating stance, which has been stuck in part on how much money the US and Nato should pay to transport the trucks through Pakistani territory.

“These agreements will give us a range of new options and the robust and flexible transport network we need,” Fogh Rasmussen told reporters.

He said the new deals would make “the use of the Russian transit arrangements even more effective.”

Moscow also has proposed allowing Nato to set up a logistics facility at the air base in Ulyanovsk, Russia, for troops and cargo heading in and out of Afghanistan.
 
. .
If it was actually a hardening of stand, this statement would have come out before NATO announcing that they have successfully negotiated a Northern route. This is just a face saving escape route for the GoP.
 
.
correct me if i am wrong but haven't supplies already started going across your borders?

as to them apologizing , it seems Pakistan has just a one point agenda , nato supplies to Afghanistan . what happens when they pull out in a couple of years . what leverage does Pakistan have then ?
 
.
If it was actually a hardening of stand, this statement would have come out before NATO announcing that they have successfully negotiated a Northern route. This is just a face saving escape route for the GoP.

face saving for what, did i miss some big news on this issue
Nato is 100 times welcomed to use Northern routes, Pakistan has never said anything about it, use any route you want. From day one we are asking for apology to open route US says they wont, and thats what it is

and the route stays closed
 
.
What changed suddenly? wasn't she the one who said only a few weeks ago that ''we made our point, now it's time to move on with US ties''?
 
.
US apology needed to open Nato supply routes: Khar

389022-khar-1338871712-572-640x480.jpg


WASHINGTON: The United States should apologize for an air raid that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers if it wants Pakistan to reopen key supply routes into Afghanistan, Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar said in an interview published Monday.

US apology needed to open Nato supply routes: Khar – The Express Tribune

US apology needed to re-open supply routes: Khar | DAWN.COM
Is it true ?? I can't believe my eyes!!!!
where did they find these bb@llz to talk like that to USA-the only imperial power on earth..???.....completely astonishing it is.....But anywayz welcome this news.....:victory:
 
. .
Might be she is aware that US is not going to use PAK route as they have got alternative route, thats why she said to gain some brownie point at home audience.
 
.
GHQ back them to bash USA .lolz now these looters wake up after 5 years ?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom