What's new

US Ambassador Failed to Block Appointment of Chinese Diplomat to Key U.N. Post

Raphael

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 1, 2012
Messages
3,287
Reaction score
5
Country
China
Location
China
https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/02/1...ey-united-states-international-organizations/

In one of her final acts as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Nikki Haley tried but failed to prevent a veteran Chinese diplomat from landing an influential post as the U.N. special envoy to Africa’s Great Lakes region.

The diplomatic bid reflects growing concern among President Donald Trump’s national security team that China is seeking to assert its power through international organizations such as the United Nations in areas traditionally under the West’s sphere of influence.

Her failure underscored the limits of U.S. power to dictate critical staffing jobs at the United Nations. To some critics, it also showcased a hypocrisy in the Trump administration’s approach to multilateral institutions: withdrawing funding and engagement from them while trying to stymie China’s influence. The back-channel discussions between Haley’s office and the U.N. secretary-general’s office were described to Foreign Policy by three U.S. and U.N. officials familiar with the internal deliberations.

U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres dismissed U.S. misgivings last month and appointed Huang Xia, a veteran Chinese diplomat who has served as Beijing’s ambassador to several African countries, as his envoy to the strategically vital region.

“The Trump administration may suddenly be coming to terms with the unintended consequences of walking away from the U.N.,” said Richard Gowan, an expert on U.N. issues at the United Nations University. “I’m not sure that, early on, the administration gave much mind to the obvious outcome of stepping back at the U.N., which would be to allow China to fill the gap.”

The National Security Council declined to comment for this story. The State Department did not immediately respond to request for comment.

Huang’s ascension marks one more way that China is augmenting its influence on the international stage. Since the end of the Cold War, China has pushed to install its diplomats in senior U.N. roles and expand its participation in U.N. peacekeeping missions. It now has more peacekeepers around the world than the other four veto-wielding U.N. powers—Britain, France, Russia, and the United States—combined and remains one of the largest financial contributors to the international body.

Guterres himself has signaled that as the United States retreats from the United Nations, China would be eager to pick up the mantle. “If one country decides not to be present—and I’m talking about countries with an important global reach like the United States or China … I can guarantee someone else will occupy it,” he said in 2017, referring to the U.S. decision to withdraw from the Paris climate agreement.

In the past year, China has effectively harnessed the United Nations’ soft power to promote President Xi Jinping’s signature foreign-policy initiative, the Belt and Road Initiative, in the developing world. U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has warned that the project allows China to engage in “predatory economic activity” that threatens to leave poor countries deeper in debt. “When China comes calling, it’s not always to the good of your citizens,” Pompeo said following a visit to Panama last October.

In December, Trump’s national security advisor, John Bolton, appointed a senior director of multilateral affairs, Elizabeth Erin Walsh, with a mandate to check Chinese influence at the U.N. and other international organizations.

Experts point to Washington’s declining influence at the United Nations in other realms. In one example, Guterres rebuffed a plea from Washington last year to refrain from hiring a former Chilean president, Michelle Bachelet, as the U.N. high commissioner for human rights.

Huang, who has more than 30 years of diplomatic experience, served as Beijing’s ambassador to Niger, Senegal, and the Republic of Congo in recent years—at a time when the countries struck major investment and infrastructure deals with China.

His diplomatic skill is what worries some U.S. officials most. They are wary he will use his perch at Turtle Bay to advance China’s interests in Africa’s Great Lakes region, which includes some of the most resource-rich and politically unstable countries on the continent.

“He’s been an extraordinarily good Chinese diplomat. And that’s part of the problem,” said one U.S. official familiar with the internal deliberations. The official said Huang “knows the region and can play it to China’s advantage.”

“Will he stand where he sits? Will he represent the U.N. position, or will he represent Beijing’s interest?” said Judd Devermont, a former senior U.S. intelligence official on Africa. “That’s still untested.”

Still, bringing senior Chinese diplomats more into the fold of multilateral organizations could have advantages for the United States, said Devermont, now with the Center for Strategic and International Studies. “When I look at Chinese engagement, particularly military engagement, in Africa, they are most productive and least counter to U.S. interests when things are done through the U.N. framework,” he said.
 
.
While China is focusing on building China, from 5G network to HSR, USA is also focusing on China, from Huawei to UN Post.

America should really be focusing on building itself, starting from California High Speed Rail, first in the US.
 
. . . .
Another sad reminder about the United States' shitty infrastructure. So much talk and zero action. When deteriorating 60 year old highways are still the main method of transportation, you know there is a huge problem.

More like California's shitty liberal elite politicians who don't get market fundamentals (the more cut off you are from the actual bread and butter worker.....the more you propose stupid pie in the sky projects that make no financial sense...given you do not believe in free market forces and demand).

I know. China is doing things at 1/10 of cost and 10 time speed of US, but US seems to be more interested in sabotaging rather than competing. This is a losing proposition.

Well California the land prices are just too high and the demand is just too low (especially for a one-off project with no further expansion using what you invested in to spread the cost etc.) where they proposed building the stations for it (not to mention the number of stops they needed in the route that would reduce average speed too much imo).

I mean if you got to drive from LA for a whole bunch of time to get to the station (because building it in the city somwwhere costs way too much)....then it already defeats the purpose and concept coz you gotta use up that time anyway for airport that exists right now and logistics can simply be improved there for much less money to achieve same result.

It is different from China in that regard given China went national scale on it. High speed rail just isn't going to make much sense in the US. They are better off just investing in better air transport sector.
 
.
While China is focusing on building China, from 5G network to HSR, USA is also focusing on China, from Huawei to UN Post.

America should really be focusing on building itself, starting from California High Speed Rail, first in the US.

this is fine
"America should really be focusing on building itself"

this is not so fine
"California High Speed Rail"

do you even think with your brain ??
 
.
Back
Top Bottom