What's new

US agrees to tell Russia Britain's nuclear secrets

Cheetah786

PDF VETERAN
Joined
Aug 23, 2006
Messages
9,002
Reaction score
-3
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
The US secretly agreed to give the Russians sensitive information on Britain’s nuclear deterrent to persuade them to sign a key treaty, The Daily Telegraph can disclose. Information about every Trident missile the US supplies to Britain will be given to Russia as part of an arms control deal signed by President Barack Obama next week.

Defence analysts claim the agreement risks undermining Britain’s policy of refusing to confirm the exact size of its nuclear arsenal.

The fact that the Americans used British nuclear secrets as a bargaining chip also sheds new light on the so-called “special relationship”, which is shown often to be a one-sided affair by US diplomatic communications obtained by the WikiLeaks website.

Details of the behind-the-scenes talks are contained in more than 1,400 US embassy cables published to date by the Telegraph, including almost 800 sent from the London Embassy, which are published online today. The documents also show that:

• America spied on Foreign Office ministers by gathering gossip on their private lives and professional relationships.

Intelligence-sharing arrangements with the US became strained after the controversy over Binyam Mohamed, the former Guantánamo Bay detainee who sued the Government over his alleged torture.

• David Miliband disowned the Duchess of York by saying she could not “be controlled” after she made an undercover TV documentary.

• Tens of millions of pounds of overseas aid was stolen and spent on plasma televisions and luxury goods by corrupt regimes.

A series of classified messages sent to Washington by US negotiators show how information on Britain’s nuclear capability was crucial to securing Russia’s support for the “New START” deal.

Although the treaty was not supposed to have any impact on Britain, the leaked cables show that Russia used the talks to demand more information about the UK’s Trident missiles, which are manufactured and maintained in the US.

Washington lobbied London in 2009 for permission to supply Moscow with detailed data about the performance of UK missiles. The UK refused, but the US agreed to hand over the serial numbers of Trident missiles it transfers to Britain.

Professor Malcolm Chalmers said: “This appears to be significant because while the UK has announced how many missiles it possesses, there has been no way for the Russians to verify this. Over time, the unique identifiers will provide them with another data point to gauge the size of the British arsenal.”

Duncan Lennox, editor of Jane’s Strategic Weapons Systems, said: “They want to find out whether Britain has more missiles than we say we have, and having the unique identifiers might help them.”

While the US and Russia have long permitted inspections of each other’s nuclear weapons, Britain has sought to maintain some secrecy to compensate for the relatively small size of its arsenal.

William Hague, the Foreign Secretary, last year disclosed that “up to 160” warheads are operational at any one time, but did not confirm the number of missiles.

WikiLeaks cables: US agrees to tell Russia Britain's nuclear secrets - Telegraph
 
.
ha..perfect US releationship at work....america works to maintain its own hedge only..
 
.
oh come on usa is a capitalist country it can sell anyone to maintain its throne.for usa emotions doesnt matter.
 
.
Britain:lol:

We should make a deal with Russians to get those info also...:lol:
 
.
US alliance at work, first principle is to be ready to be sold out from their hands, next principle is to be bombed out to stone age, other threats follow..

while britain and others lasted for centuries as super powers, US cannot last few decades with this attitude.. the result is very clear..
 
.
i dont get it....are the US actually that stupid???they could lose all of their allies if they keep on going like this....are they actually arrogant enough to believe they can stand alone without any allies???i mean,come on...Iraq and Afghanistan...how many british forces were deployed???and they do this to them..??other NATO members will get pissed off with things like this,and their trust in the US is gonna decrease....what are the US gonna do then???

or do they actually believe they can take over the world with their marines XD hahahha!!!

and nice deal for russia :P
 
. .
i dont get it....are the US actually that stupid???they could lose all of their allies if they keep on going like this....are they actually arrogant enough to believe they can stand alone without any allies???i mean,come on...Iraq and Afghanistan...how many british forces were deployed???and they do this to them..??other NATO members will get pissed off with things like this,and their trust in the US is gonna decrease....what are the US gonna do then???

or do they actually believe they can take over the world with their marines XD hahahha!!!

and nice deal for russia :P

Oi... Mr NewBie. Stop reactivating old threads.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom