What's new

UPDATE: Syrian Surface-To-Air Missile Flew Way Off Course Triggering Alarms Before Exploding Over Israel

I can confirm with 90% accuracy confirm there was attack on Dimona and some how **** ( I dont mean Syria, Lebanon. or Gaza ) was involvied

but wouldnt be a direct attack on Dimona be a bit excessive?
which event would justify an direct attack on Dimona?!
or this "attack" missed deliberately by ~ some kilmeters as warning?
 
. .
This was a significant missile attack or may even be a suicide drone attack. This stupid SAM theory is definitely false.

when Iranians hit that US base they used many missiles and were extremely precise. Would Iran send just one missile?
 
.
Lets recap:

1- This morning's large explosion in a missile factory was: "controlled explosion".

2- Tonites multiple explosions was "stray s-200 missile"

3- Last week's Attack on MOSSAD base in Kurdistan: "never happened".

if you know anything about laws of probability then the answer is clear:

"you are all crazy and Jews always tell the truth!!!:azn:
 
.
but wouldnt be an direct attack on Dimona be a bit excessive?
which event would justify an direct attack on Dimona?!
or this "attack" missed deliberately by ~ some kilmeters as warning?

Well Dimona is a big facility. It's like saying attack on Natanz, doesn't nessisraily mean it triggers radioactive danger depending where/how.

A direct hit on the reactor could cause Chernobyl like effect. It's definitely excessive. Perhaps Israel would have to be evacuated if such a thing occurred.
 
.
but wouldnt be a direct attack on Dimona be a bit excessive?
which event would justify an direct attack on Dimona?!
or this "attack" missed deliberately by ~ some kilmeters as warning?
NOT clear yet, we are studying situation,

I have no info apart from the one i have already wrote
 
.
I find the story that this was a stray S-200 missile suspicious, to say the least. Air defense missiles have small warheads intended to damage aircraft by blast fragmentation. They're also radar-fuse fired and usually explode in mid-air if they don't hit a target within an intended range.

Even a short-range ballistic missile like the Iskandr has a warhead weight at least twice that of an S-200.
 
. . .
Well Dimona is a big facility. It's like saying attack on Natanz, doesn't nessisraily mean it triggers radioactive danger depending where/how.

A direct hit on the reactor could cause Chernobyl like effect. It's definitely excessive. Perhaps Israel would have to be evacuated if such a thing occurred.

by "direct attack" I mean with missiles/drones and not saboteurs inside of the building where you can lie to the press and to the public (Cyberattack, failed/planned tests...blabla)

with direct attacks (missiles/drones) there is no room for "plausible deniability"

but as we know, its too early and we have only speculations as for now, we have to wait
 
Last edited:
. . .
Lets recap:

1- This morning's large explosion in a missile factory was: "controlled explosion".

2- Tonites multiple explosions was "stray s-200 missile"

3- Last week's Attack on MOSSAD base in Kurdistan: "never happened".

if you know anything about laws of probability then the answer is clear:

"you are all crazy and Jews always tell the truth!!!:azn:
A nice collection of 1001 Arabian nights
 
. .
I can confirm with 90% accuracy confirm there was attack on Dimona and some how **** ( I dont mean Syria, Lebanon. or Gaza ) was involvied
Do you know wat was the range of the attack? Wat weapons or how many missiles were used? Nd what damage was inflicted? Anything?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom