What's new

Up to 40,000 Native American children may have died at government-run boarding schools across the US, expert says as remains of 10 kids are exhumed fr

Empires like the Mughals at least fought for Islam. Even the Spanish at least fought for Catholicism. US imperialism is unique in that its purely for selfish aims without ideal. It explains why the culture is so dumbed down.

EDIT: I forgot. US imperialism does have some concept of higher ideals. Pushing cultural Marxist globohomo is US imperialism's concept of having ideals.

Oh, the genocidal US regime does have ideals. Pretty ingrained ones too.

Best summarized by depictions such as these:

AtbtTlT6t4vZFwWx63hgqOLdjteDVz5kSI0dU07kDJk.jpg


map_for_capcom_1.jpg


the-pyramid-and-the-allseeing-eye-symbols-used-in-the-great-seal-of-picture-id525515034
 
Last edited:
. . .
Not really. Anglos are the masters of genocide and it isn't even close. Mao was an idiotic policy maker and his policies led to the accidental death of millions, though the total amount has been grossly exaggerated.

But Anglos committed genocide on three separate continental sized nations, the US, Canada and Australia. The proof is evident for all to see as those native lands have become "White" homelands in the last 200 years. The turmoil and anger you see tearing up American society today as people of color gain more numbers and voice are simply the chickens coming home to roost. It is funny how karma works that way. The reality is that the White man has committed so much evil at such a horrific scale, that the hatred this has created will never be buried and as the darker skinned peoples descended from those who were on the receiving side of this colonialism, abuse and genocide become more numerous, America is destined to a future of unending racial conflict and bloodshed.

dbc must be high on something or he'd never learned his own country's history. Sad.. I meant the history, OR maybe that he'd not heard of George Washington's ethnic killings or the manifest destiny.
 
. .
dbc must be high on something or he'd never learned his own country's history. Sad.. I meant the history, OR maybe that he'd not heard of George Washington's ethnic killings or the manifest destiny.

You may be forgiven for your poor grasp of the English language. You can accuse General George Washington of war crimes but such conventions did not exist during his time, You cannot accuse him of ethnic killings since he fought and killed the Iroquois not for their ethnicity but because they were allied to the British. Much like Mao when he fought and killed members of the Kuomintang.
 
.
What is worse than forgetting history is having a selective memory of it.

Besides, what people do not realize is the openness of US society in confronting its past, and its present ills, to build a better tomorrow. When all the enemies have is a self-report analyzing the events of 150 years ago, you know they have already lost the present and therefore the future and this is all they have left to console themselves.

USA, meanwhile, will always learn from itself, including its history, to continuously improve itself. Meliora!


So your beef is with Great Britain. Trying to pin the sins of the father on the children will never work.
Abey tou kiyo itna uchal raha hai america ka defend karne mein

Remember how many your kind were incorrectly deported and forcefully send back to Pakistan in the aftermath of 9/11 ... You are not white so will always be at the bottom of the barrel.
 
.
You may be forgiven for your poor grasp of the English language. You can accuse General George Washington of war crimes but such conventions did not exist during his time, You cannot accuse him of ethnic killings since he fought and killed the Iroquois not for their ethnicity but because they were allied to the British. Much like Mao when he fought and killed members of the Kuomintang.

Members of the Kuomintang = political affiliation.

Iroquois = ethnic / tribal affiliation.

So no, it's not the same at all. Targeted mass murder / extermination of entire communities - uninvolved civilians included, has strictly nothing to do with conflicts between political parties. The former constitutes war crime or genocide, the latter is regular conduct of warfare.

 
Last edited:
. . . .
So no, it's not the same at all. Targeted mass murder / extermination of entire communities - uninvolved civilians included, has strictly nothing to do with conflicts between political parties. The former constitutes war crime or genocide, the latter is regular conduct of warfare.

yes to war crime no to genocide since the Iroquois were British subjects and treaty bound to the English. You of all people should know genocide is what the Mongols did to your forefathers.

There is a difference the Iroquois were targeted for their political affiliation not for their ethnicity.

Genocide is the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group
 
.
There is a difference the Iroquois were targeted for their political affiliation not for their ethnicity.

Genocide is the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group

It depends. In case the entire community (within reach of Washington's forces) was exterminated, and even if the decision to do so was primarily triggered by some "wrong" political choice made by the community's leaders, rather than by some generic discriminatory aversion for their "ethnicity", then it is still genocide.

If however a limited number of Iroquois settlements were affected, then it is a war crime and possibly a crime against humanity.

Political affiliations apply either to individuals or to organized political structures (tribal leadership, political party, state etc). Not collectively to national, ethnic or religious communities. To suggest that the Iroquois as a whole, including ordinary civilians with no political responsibilities or functions (such as children, newborn, uninvolved adults and so on) were allied to the British would be incorrect.
 
Last edited:
.
care to put another circle on China?

all imperialists are same... measuring sizes of opponents casualties but not seeing your own carnage.

Go get cont of mao dung's maniacal genocidal deaths first like it is done in for Russia.
白人分布.png
 
.
You may be forgiven for your poor grasp of the English language. You can accuse General George Washington of war crimes but such conventions did not exist during his time, You cannot accuse him of ethnic killings since he fought and killed the Iroquois not for their ethnicity but because they were allied to the British. Much like Mao when he fought and killed members of the Kuomintang.

Speaking of 'correctness' of the English language, I could easily point out many mistakes you wrote. So you better shut up on that subject. I'm not sure if English is your first language. If it is, I could only pity those learning in the UK. LOL.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom