What's new

UP: Muslim Families Put up ‘For Sale’ Signs Outside Homes in Shamli, Some Flee, Citing Police Brutal

It is an attack and affront on core tenets of Islam: the Shariah law. The government can pass it on paper but if they try to enforce the law, it will be seen as an attack on Muslims way of life. After that, many of you stupid idiots will have to die as there will be bloodbath on the streets.

Lol. If we ask them to live in the 21st century morals and we get threats in return. How long do you suppose we accommodate this? You have no problem accommodating their beliefs but you rile up when states pass 'no beef' law based on the majoritarian belief. 'No beef' as well as 'UCC' was mentioned in the constitution by its drafters themselves. Your hypocrisy has no bounds.

Also why is there not blood bath in UK streets where there is UCC? Stop talking from your behind.
 
Last edited:
.
Triple talaq was a purely Indian problem. It has been banned in many Muslim countries as well including Pakistan. Also within Indian Muslim ulema guidelines, it was already strongly discouraged for many years.

Your ignorance is mind-numbingly high but I am happy to answer.
Muslim personal law board argued that its an integral part of sharia.
 
. .
I am with you. Can we start drafting the changes I want to see in muslim communities as well? You can quote all vices and I would do the same. Let's hash it out and rid India of all vices.

You have already listed them ad nauseum. Go ahead with all changes you want as long as you include my considerations as well.
 
.
I kinda agree with your point.

India needs to be partitioned. Muslims should have the right to their own nation with their own law and you can do what you want in yours.
If you have balls, come and take it. Otherwise shut the fu(k up. INTERNET HERO. REAL LIFE DESERTER.

- PRTP GWD
 
.
You have already listed them ad nauseum. Go ahead with all changes you want as long as you include my considerations as well.
tenor.gif
 
.
You have already listed them ad nauseum. Go ahead with all changes you want as long as you include my considerations as well.
Thank you. We'll get back to this discussion when there is an actual UCC on the table. Don't backtrack then.
 
.
Lol. If we ask them to live in the 21st century morals and we get threats in return. How long do you suppose we accommodate this? You have no problem accommodating their beliefs but you rile up when states pass 'no beef' law based on the majoritarian belief. 'No beef' as well as 'UCC' was mentioned in the constitution by its drafters themselves. Your hypocrisy has no bounds.

Also why is there not blood bath in UK streets where there is UCC? Stop talking from your behind.

You will see, Sanghi cowboy.

Lol. If we ask them to live in the 21st century morals and we get threats in return. How long do you suppose we accommodate this? You have no problem accommodating their beliefs but you rile up when states pass 'no beef' law based on the majoritarian belief. 'No beef' as well as 'UCC' was mentioned in the constitution by its drafters themselves. Your hypocrisy has no bounds.

Also why is there not blood bath in UK streets where there is UCC? Stop talking from your behind.

You know jack about Islam and Islamic beliefs, and still running your mouth on a topic you don't understand.

How would you like it if Muslims start speculating whether Ram and Sita were incestuous siblings, and whether Brahma masturbated to create Saraswati or whatever.

Didn't like it? UCC is an interference in Islamic deeply held values. How long do you think they will take it sitting down? Government can pass it on paper all they can. There will be a major backlash if it's enforced.
 
.
Again you are deflecting because you know the answer. I openly challenge you to tell me what is Hindu in the UCC I have proposed?

If you don't know UCC stands for Uniform Civil Code. There are 2 types of laws - Civil and Criminal. The Criminal Laws are the IPC or Indian Penal Code. It is for all people. Civil laws are laws related to Marriage, Inheritence Divorce. You asked for UCC, I have given you a UCC proposal.

You are now stuck like any other leftist. You know in your heart that what I have given is not at all majoritarian but it is one of the most secular proposal. You also know in your heart that Muslims will not accept it because they love their own laws. And because Muslims wont accept it no "secular" parties will accept it.
Ok, I will bite- lets say for the purpose of argument Muslims of India dont accept this proposal for UCC!- Have they accepted CAA or other pograms of BJP?- Has this stopped you guys from tying to implement?- So my question is whats stopping you now, scared that it may get accepted since it would be universal as per the law of the land, then what do you guys do then?
 
. .
In India it is Satyamev Jayate, Not in Ram we trust

Which clause/article would you like to change in the Constitution of India Perhaps Article 30A which gives special rights to minorities. Lets remove the word religious minorities because all religions should be equal in a UCC Secular State
First remove religion as a field in applications-Automatically the caste/ creed will disappear since there wont be a sub section when you dont have a section itself. There has to be a starting point somewhere- India is a very diverse country for UCC to work you cant make everyone happy.

Lol. Obviously UCC is not about accommodating your religious beliefs. Now @ChennaiDude tell me who is making a special case for their religion. Stop being naive.
For UCC to work- The Indian constitution has to be revamped no one is special everyone has to adhere to the laws of the land. It needs to be a bottom up approach- No one said its going to be easy-Thats the best part.
 
.
Since you mentioned Uniform Civil Code...I agree! (apologies if you have seen this before)

Why can a Hindu man not have four wives? Why can a Hindu man not divorce his wife? Why can a Muslim man not abandon his wife like Narendra Modi? Why can a Hindu man have a "rakhel" like Atal Bihari Vajpayee and not give her the status of a wife with all rights? Why does a Hindu woman have to marry a dog or a tree before she can get married?

I want equal rights for ALL!

I want Uniform Civil Code where a North Indian Hindu can marry his niece just like a South Indian Hindu does.

I want a Uniform Civil Code where a Hindu woman in a business family can get equal inheritance and not have her brothers gobble up all the inheritance under the Hindu Undivided Family Act

I want a Uniform Civil Code where a Rajasthani Hindu can eat beef just like the Hindus from Kerela.

I want a Uniform Civil Code where a temple priest will not refuse to adjudicate a wedding between two different castes.

I want a Uniform Civil Code where a Hindu woman can enter a temple during her periods.

I want a Uniform Civil Code where a Dalit cannot be prevented from visiting a temple.
Now you are interfering in our religion's internal matter. You must be a Pakistani agent.
:cheesy:
 
.
@ChennaiDude you have painted yourself in a corner. None of you "secular" leftist or Muslim comrades are supporting UCC. This is what we have always said. You cant find one Hindu majoritarian aspect in the UCC I have proposed so you are trying to wriggle out by saying change the constitution. I dare you to propose to drop the reference to religious minorities from the article 30 A
Why are you challenging me?- You wanted CAA as well, that did not stop you, did it?- Since you know all the road blocks, what is that you propose?- Look for a solution not the issues- Status quo is not going to work?
 
.
Ok, I will bite- lets say for the purpose of argument Muslims of India dont accept this proposal for UCC!- Have they accepted CAA or other pograms of BJP?- Has this stopped you guys from tying to implement?- So my question is whats stopping you now, scared that it may get accepted since it would be universal as per the law of the land, then what do you guys do then?
Lol. You are so naive.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom