'Unprovoked' mortar fire by Iran's forces kills one in Balochistan's Panjgoor

[PaklovesTurkiye]

Indeed you're right - lassi pee tey chill maar dil per mat lay

 

[HAIDER]

I guess there are not much investments, its just unconditional loyalty they drive from followers of Khumeni.
We all know how Benazir (apparently liberal) supported them and how Asif Ali Zardari murderer of same BB hired people in institutions of Pakistan, violating all merit and rules.


Trouble on Pakistan side is becuase of Indian presence in Iran.

Indian meddling in Baluchistan through Iran, Iran blame Jandullah operating from Afghanistan and Iran. How this situation will be dissolved ? ...

 

[!eon]

If your forces are there why you let terrorists to move into your boarders after conducting terrorist attacks !?

Or it's another story !!!

Pakistan is behind all of this...

Months ago our intelligence service catched an isis terrorist which entered from Pakistan !!!

& his mission fully financed by a saudi prince ... & we all know about the ongoing relations between Pakistan and Saudis...

There are terrible things ongoing in the background...

It's first time that Military officer of Lt.Colonel rank is captured in an intelligence operation, who was conducting his operations from base in Iran.

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

Trouble on all borders, everyone is conspiring against Pakistan.

it's not big issue. will be resolved easily. maybe iranians thought them to be smugglers. it's very common business there. people on both sides of border do smuggling.
the fact that iranian border is not heavily militarized shows the trust of both sides.

 

[bafxet]

More than incidence is the hypocracy of Iran loyalists thriving in Pakistan.
There are no sorry words for the dead, but from post 2 they start issuing exuses and it happenes all the time.

Stay on the course between two countries i.e. Pakistan and Iran, without giving it any religious color. God forbid a religious divide in the country behold extremely lethal consequence. Yemen and Syria are the best examples and should serve as an eye opener.

 

[Tps43]

Don't trust this forum.
years ago, I was attacked in Lahore, when i started to challenge baseless propaganda.
So just take care... those Iranian culture centers are not there without reason.

Sir that is why I would be sharing info in hints as this is open forum

Look Iranian counslates,cultural centers are one thing how many of shia madrsas get funding from iran thats another story after saudia iran is doing most funding to madrasas. Things u achive through diplomatic propoganda is much bigger than things u achive from other means. Iran says it has got most secure borders in ME then how come things get smuggle into iran

 

[RoadRunner401]

Pakistanis instead of complaining should join hands with Iran in fighting this terrorism.

I have seen Shias in India to be very logical in their stand on many issues and are at forefront in fighting fanatics.

L O L, these, so-called civilian vehicles are smugglers and Iranians are authorized by Pak Government and Military to take actions against them, Patriots having orgasm at this news will burn Pakistan to the ground to protect House of Saud, one can see why they are upset at this Iranian Action

 

[Reichsmarschall]

Actually, there are four types of Pakistanis..

1 - Those who love India
2 - Those who love Iran
3 - Those who love Saudi Arabia
4 - The remaining small percentage which loves Pakistan

5- Those who love Uncle Sam and Boys(Desi liberals)

 

[Well.wisher]

Even if this is not another one of these fake news, as every few months such news come out but with no evidence, just some random claims, let's assume this is true, pakistanis should not moan and cry, if you're unable to secure your side of the border, then Iran will take actions.

All of these terrorists come from the pakistani side, either commit their crimes and run back to pakistan in a hit and run manner or are smugglers. It does not matter how much Iran tries to secure its side, as long as pakistani side is a safe heaven for people, some will inevitable break through.So don't cry if Iran takes action.

If you think Iran will just sit back and allow terrorist from your side to continue committing acts of terror then you're deluding yourself. Iran has on countless occasions asked paksistan to take care of its side of the border, but either pakistani forces lack the capability or are unwilling to deal with it.

Your claim of Iran killing only 'smugglers ' or 'terrorists ' requires a valid proof as there are many victims of afghan refugees in iran who were being killed by iranian forces for the reason that they were crossing iran border to reach turkey . Among them were women too .

Pakistan Gov is more responsible than the Pakistan posters in PDF...I think in general, Pakistan people like Iran, but these kind of situation is also difficult to control emotions..
.

And I really pity those who love iran more than pakistan for religious reasons . Seriously look at iranians how do they treat us , it's a racist nation with no mercy for the lower south asians .
These kind of pakistanis should get some sense and stop licking Iran's foot just because Khomeini lives there .
Sectarian love is making them blind .
Iranians are runing away from religion , those shias who think they want iran to form a islamic caliphate should visit iran and see how much iranians loathe religion .
Love your country , love your shia fellows in own country .

 

[Baybars Han]

@Kaka420 is the example of iranian intelligence and mullah network working in Pakistan. Is your allegiance with Iran or your own country?

 

[Reichsmarschall]

You are wrong..I will rephrase in a better way.

1 - Those who love India - Trying to be intellectuals...
2 - Those who love Iran - They love their Shia religion...In place of Iran, if India would be place of Shia religious places, then would have loved too...I do not blame them as you people put too much importance on religion
3 - Those who love Saudi Arabia - Again, these people are more loyal to Sunni sect and Islam as a religion.
4 - The remaining small percentage which loves Pakistan : This is because you have defined your nationalism in the prism of religion...So whoever feels more religious, are convincing themselves are more Pakistani than others...

those who live in Glass houses should not throw stones at others


Those Not Saying 'Bharat Mata Ki Jai' Should Leave India: Kailash Vijayvargiya
All India | Press Trust of India | Updated: March 15, 2016 17:29 IST

by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored
The Ultimate Way to Get Cheap Hotel Rooms (Save70)
Finally You Can Track Your Car Using Your Smartphone (Smart Device Trends)


7COMMENTS

BJP leader Kailash Vijayvargiya said that those who dont want to chant Bharat Mata Ki Jai, should go to some other country.

KOLKATA: In the backdrop of All India Majlis-e-Ittehad-ul Muslimeen (AIMIM) leader Asaduddin Owaisi's statement that he would not chant 'Bharat Mata ki Jai', BJP General Secretary Kailash Vijayvargiya today said those who did not want to say the slogan had no right to stay in India.

"I feel that those who don't want to chant Bharat Mata Ki Jai have no right to stay in India. They should go to some other country," Mr Vijayvargiya told reporters.


Rejecting Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) chief Mohan Bhagwat's suggestion for chanting the slogan to infuse patriotism, Mr Owaisi had yesterday said he would not say 'Bharat Mata ki Jai' even if a knife was put to his throat prompting Shiv Sena to tell him that he should go to Pakistan.

Mr Owaisi's statement came days after Mr Bhagwat said the new generation needed to be taught to chant slogans hailing Mother India.

(This story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Narendra Modi’s India, where the Hindus are holier than thou


World View: Hindu nationalists have long made it clear that those of other faiths are in the land of Krishna only on sufferance

• Peter Popham
• @peterpopham
• Friday 4 March 2016
• 8 comments

515
Click to follow
The Independent Online

With the landslide election of Narendra Modi nearly two years ago, the Hindu spirit found full political expression for the first time, with a sannyasin, no less, a Hindu renunciate, in command. Getty
You may not have heard of the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom. Neither had I. They sound like exactly the sort of American busybodies you don’t need coming around, asking impertinent questions and compiling arrogant reports: post-colonialists masquerading as Mary Poppins, with a Band Aid for all the world’s problems.

So I sympathise with the Indian government of Narendra Modi when it announced that it was declining to issue this organisation with visas. True, the Commission has tramped around several other countries that can hardly have been eager to roll out the welcome mat: Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, China, Vietnam, Burma. More fool those countries, all of which have plenty to be ashamed of.

India, by contrast, has only reasons for pride. With the landslide election of Narendra Modi nearly two years ago, the Hindu spirit found full political expression for the first time, with a sannyasin, no less, a Hindu renunciate, in command.


READ MORE
Indian police 'tell raped women to stay silent to protect their honour
Finally, after the centuries of foreign domination followed by the socialists and appeasers of the Congress party, this sage of nations could chart its true destiny: rediscovering the course of the long-buried Saraswati river, rebuilding the temple of Ayodhya, birthplace of the god-king Rama – and ensuring that the nation’s economy, like that of Modi-ji’s home state of Gujarat, gallops ahead.

It is of course a fact that India is not entirely populated by Hindus, but as Hindu nationalists have long made it clear, those of other faiths need to understand that they are in the land of Krishna only on sufferance. If they inflame Hindus’ feelings, there is often little that the Union government, far away in New Delhi, can do about it.

This was the case, for example, with Mohammad Akhlaq Saifi, a 56-year-old Muslim resident of Dadri village in Uttar Pradesh: when rumours spread that he and his family had celebrated the festival of Eid by eating the meat of a murdered cow, the local people became enraged and took their revenge on him. This followed the discovery of meat in his refrigerator which they assumed to be that of the cow in question.

The local people were quite wrong to stone Mr Akhlaq to death. It is also unfortunate that the meat in his fridge proved to be goat. But those family members who survive him, instead of bleating to the media about lynch mobs, might be better advised to become vegetarians.

Given India’s vast distances, what can government be expected to do about such events? That applies equally to Professor Kalburgi of Karnataka state, shot to death in his home in 2014 by unknown assailants. No one should suffer such an end. Equally, no one should be as rash as Dr Kalburgi had been, describing the worship of images of Krishna, Shiva etc, as “meaningless ritual”, going so far as to say they could be urinated on. He must have been well aware of the risks. His attackers have yet to be found.

READ MORE

• Would-be soldiers made to strip by Indian army 'to stop cheating'
• Nearly 100 Indian school pupils hospitalised after eating school meal
• Girls and unmarried women in India banned from using mobile phones

India, as the Indian Embassy in Washington puts it, “is a vibrant pluralistic society founded on strong democratic principles”. But that does not mean people are exempt from using their common sense.

It stands to reason that Hindus should feel more at home in India than Muslims or Christians, who would be well advised to move to Pakistan or Europe. Once there, nothing would prevent them applying for a visa to pay a sentimental return visit.

Given India’s vast distances, what can government be expected to do about lynch mobs?


How Hindu Nationalists Took Over India
The movement seeks to advance the aims of a minority, but relies upon a much broader constituency for its support.

By Nandini Deo
May 31, 2016


The last Indian general election concluded on May 12, 2014. Initial predictions were for the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) – the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led coalition – to capture 220 out of 545 seats. In fact, the BJP alone won 282, while the NDA coalition combined won 336. The scale of the BJP’s victory – and certainly the possibility that the party could win an absolute majority on its own – was not predicted or anticipated by even the most seasoned observers of Indian politics. Almost two years later a number of questions persist: How do we explain the surprising results of the election? What does the election indicate about the broader Hindu nationalist movement and its success? And how has the party (and the movement) used its time in office thus far?

It is worth noting that because of India’s first-past-the-post electoral system, the BJP won 51.7 percent of seats in the Lok Sabha despite winning only 31 percent of the popular vote. Thus, one should not exaggerate the extent of this victory in terms of it signifying some sweeping political consensus. Many accounts of the election and its aftermath have suggested that the public broadly embraced the Hindu nationalist movement. It is more accurate to say that almost a third of the electorate selected the BJP’s campaign platform over the alternatives.

The BJP is the political party of the Hindu nationalist movement, which consists of about three dozen organizations that are united by a commitment to an ideology of Hindutva. This ideology is based on the assertion that India is the homeland of Hindus (broadly defined to also include Buddhists, Jains, and Sikhs). As the Hindu homeland, the state should serve as a champion of Hindus and their interests. The ideology papers over the many differences among Hindus, especially of caste and language, while emphasizing the separation between most Indians and their Muslim and Christian compatriots. These ideas are based on a fabricated historical narrative and poor sociology, but their aim is not to accurately describe India as much as to create new facts on the ground.

 

[Max]

If your forces are there why you let terrorists to move into your boarders after conducting terrorist attacks !?

like Rigi brothers? they were Pakistanis? NO, they were product of your oppression on Balochs.. did Pakistanis formed Jandullah and Jaish al adal? its funny a citizen of officially sanctioned country for state sponsored terrorism is accusing Pakistan for terrorism..

& his mission fully financed by a saudi prince ... & we all know about the ongoing relations between Pakistan and Saudis...

There are terrible things ongoing in the background...

Should i show your hired scums walking with Pics of Khomeini, Hassan Nasrullah in Pakistani cities? why? bcoz you fund them here..

Or it's another story !!!

its other way around, Kulbhoshan arrest, chahbahar says it otherwise..

Months ago our intelligence service catched an isis terrorist which entered from Pakistan !!!

did you share anything with Pakistan like we did in case of foreign agent using your soil, How Uzair Baloch (a Mafia and gang leader) was travelling as Iranian..

 

[Baba Google]

@Kaka420 is the example of iranian intelligence and mullah network working in Pakistan. Is your allegiance with Iran or your own country?

Sir, I try to follow perfection and I believe in beyond perfection - my allegiance is with that certain perfection and beyond perfection no one else. plus I do not have any problem with Turkish ppl, I consider them my friends/ my brothers in faith / my equals in humanity but if there comes the time where I had to choose between turkish and Iranian, thn I wud definitely choose Iran (no offence to turkish ppl).

nothing personal.

 

[Baybars Han]

Sir, I try to follow perfection and I believe in beyond perfection - my allegiance is with that certain perfection and beyond perfection no one else. plus I do not have any problem with Turkish ppl, I consider them my friends/ my brothers in faith / my equals in humanity but if there comes the time where I had to choose between turkish and Iranian, thn I wud definitely choose Iran (no offence to turkish ppl).

nothing personal.

I'm sure you won't understand exactly what I'm trying to say because your mentality is different. I'm presuming you are Shia and believe Iran is the protectors of all Shia's or something? No! They are just using people like you for their own agenda. If you will choose Iran because you believe its closer to your nation or helped your nation more fair enough but just because of blind religious fanatism, then sorry to say but thats wrong.

 

[Baba Google]

I'm sure you won't understand exactly what I'm trying to say because your mentality is different.

Sir, first you need to understand what I've just written in my last post cuz I believe what I've written is beyond your understanding.