Featured United States, United Kingdom and France blocked Pakistani efforts to identify two Indian terrorists

[El Sidd]

Im loyal to the US as my adopted country of citizenship and India my place of birth and former nationality.
I continue to do everything in my power to bring the two countries and people closer.
That will never change.

You would not be a fair person if you don't do as such. But Nazis in your rank consider financing terrorism in Pakistan as a patriotic duty to India.

 

[Peshwa]

You see sunshine, these efforts are not always done to get the results which one might perceive should have been achieved but sometimes they bring forth what has been hiding from plain sight.

Riiiiiiight!
So not putting forth ANY evidence of the acts of terrorism by these individuals was a way to bring up something that was hiding from plain sight?
Your logic is impeccable I must say.
In the same breath, flat earthers too are bringing up something the rest of us are missing to notice?

Nobody in Pakistan looking moronic, we take these Indians as terrorists, and that is what matter. So next time, US, UK and France have some issues, scores will be settled then. That's the name of the game.

Yes, I'm sure you will. I wont hold my breath.
You definitely shouldn't lol

We in this forum are not privy to the what evidence was shared. So take a chill. What we know, that one of the Indian terrorist was working for an American security firm in Afghanistan. Rabbit hole goes a lot deeper, had it been just you on your own conducting your terrorist activities against Pakistan, it wont be much of any issue but hey, you are not on your own in Afghanistan, rather riding on someone else shoulders, and that is why these efforts were blocked.

Yet, youre convinced they should be labelled terrorists? Why? because they're Indian?

Don't worry about Bananas, those spiked baseball bats , are they still givin pain in your nation behind? lol

Actually, I for one am glad they died fighting to defend their nation, lest people confuse us for Pakistanis who are famous for mass surrenders.
Better to die with clubs than to roll over and beg your arch enemy to protect you from death lol
We are happy to die with clubs, but you will have to live with the shame of 93,000 coward Pakistanis for the rest of your nations existence lol

 

[Peshwa]

You would not be a fair person if you don't do as such. But Nazis in your rank consider financing terrorism in Pakistan as a patriotic duty to India.

Let me make one thing crystal clear.
I am against terrorism of ANY kind. I understand that India is no saint, but also know that as an average civilian, there are many things outside the purview of information that reaches us.
If it can be proven that these people are involved in killing innocents or funding terrorism (through free and fair trials), I would be the first to cheer them to the gallows. Their nationality is irrelevant in that case.
In that scenario, I will stand with a Pakistani in putting these people to the gallows.

 

[HAIDER]

Pakistan don't need to waste time. The prime minister of India responsible of Gujrat massacre and nothing happened .... lolz.... a terrorist leadership .... What people can expect, when Indian nation elect a known killer ..

 

[Peshwa]

View attachment 666638

We snatched this terrorists. What can India or USA/UK/France do about it?

Listen, you could have picked up a beggar from Indian streets and labelled him a terrorist mastermind. We have no control over the narrative you want to promote. That is your business.

The question we are trying to answer here is, can you (Pakistan) convince through irrefutable evidence the rest of the world (In this case UNSC) to designate him a terrorist?
If so, why go after the two clowns mentioned in the OP? You seem to have hit a home run with KBY..Why not present his case to the UNSC and convince them of his and Indias hand in terrorism in Pak?
Your country is obviously convinced (hence the death sentence)...Now please convince through evidence the rest of the world.

Food for thought.

 

[CrazyZ]

Listen, you could have picked up a beggar from Indian streets and labelled him a terrorist mastermind. We have no control over the narrative you want to promote. That is your business.

The question we are trying to answer here is, can you (Pakistan) convince through irrefutable evidence the rest of the world (In this case UNSC) to designate him a terrorist?
If so, why go after the two clowns mentioned in the OP? You seem to have hit a home run with KBY..Why not present his case to the UNSC and convince them of his and Indias hand in terrorism in Pak?

Food for thought.

Blah..Blah...Blah NATO can not reveal it was protecting terrorists in Afghanistan. It doesn't matter what evidence we provide. We have to go through the motions at the UN, that's it. In the end snatch and grab or assassinations is a more effective approach.

 

[Peshwa]

Remember every wrong turn in Pakistan is blamed on India two seconds after it happens. No investigation is necessary and none taken. Dossiers are updated and sent to every Tom, Dick, and Harry, who then just throw it into a dustbin. Pakistan has been trying to link APS to India for years but offer no proof. The attackers weren’t Hindu baniyas but Islamic extremists, who are at war with Pakistan and its military. Regardless, there’s no benefit for India in killing children. That is beyond the pale for even most cynical person.

Finally, why would anybody listen to a country that is busy fighting to get off the FATF grey list?

This Pakistani dossier could have come in handy when there was a shortage of toilet paper in the US.
Damn youz Pakistan!

 

[Peshwa]

Blah..Blah...Blah NATO can not reveal it was protecting terrorists in Afghanistan. It doesn't matter what evidence we provide. We have to go through the motions at the UN, that's it. In the end snatch and grab or assassinations is a more effective approach.

So if that is the case and you know it, then who exactly is your country trying to expose through going to the UNSC? NATO (US, France, UK, Germany who oppOsed this motion in unsc and also are NATO ) as you put it, is hand in glove with these terrorists.
So then why waste Pakistani tax payer money on these dossiers, if youre appealing to the conscience of the very people who are trying to hurt your country?

Does that even make sense?

 

[LeGenD]

@Peshwa

You are flamebaiting in your posts. Be warned.

 

[Peshwa]

@Peshwa

You are flamebaiting in your posts. Be warned.

Seriously? I'm the one flamebaiting?
That comment about the "Spiked bats" is not?
If you're going to have double standards, at least be covert about it.
Did not expect this from you, but its par for the course now.

 

[LeGenD]

Seriously? I'm the one flamebaiting?
That comment about the "Spiked bats" is not?
If you're going to have double standards, at least be covert about it.
Did not expect this from you, but its par for the course now.

Post # 2
Post # 6

Now tell me.

 

[CrazyZ]

So if that is the case and you know it, then who exactly is your country trying to expose through going to the UNSC? NATO (US, France, UK, Germany who oppOsed this motion in unsc and also are NATO ) as you put it, is hand in glove with these terrorists.
So then why waste Pakistani tax payer money on these dossiers, if youre appealing to the conscience of the very people who are trying to hurt your country?

Does that even make sense?

You seem very sensitive about the dossier being given to the UNSC. If its irrelevant as claim then why waste your time trying to troll it? Ignore it and move on. They way your reacting....maybe your worried its more damning.

 

[Peshwa]

Post # 2
Post # 6

Now tell me.

#2 Claiming that Pakistan is airing its grievences is flamebaiting? Especially in light of the fact that the news about Pakistan's move to designate two Indians as terrorist was rejected has nothing to do with their grievances regarding the Kashmir issue? Seemed like they were throwing all their issues into one news piece.

#6 "Putting lipstick on a pig" is a very common term that has been used by Pakistanis several times when referring to Indians. Whining and Crying including the term "Randi Rona" is also something Pakistanis use very commonly. Not sure how this is flamebaiting

Nevertheless, I will delete those messages out of respect for you.
But please note that PDF Pakistanis and moderators expect Indians to have thick skin, but cant seem to handle it when the shoe is on the other foot.
Also note the fact that I didnt make any personal attack, but here you have an "elite" member saying this freely

Na Indian rat, by in large we don't give monkies to your sugardaddies. These exercises are important to hammer home the realities of the world and bring forth the filthy nature of geopolitics to the Pakistani citizens. "your terrorist is the hero of the others" , hopefully, from now on, there wont be any "Pakistani" on the UN list regardless what they did or did not do.

The hypocrisy in this case is not lost on us.

 

[Peshwa]

You seem very sensitive about the dossier being given to the UNSC. If its irrelevant as claim then why waste your time trying to troll it? Ignore it and move on. They way your reacting....maybe your worried its more damning.

Given how sensitive your countrymen are, since clearly mods have been brought in to defend your lot.
I'm just going to hold my comments any further, lest I hurt your delicate sensibilities.

 

[LeGenD]

#2 Claiming that Pakistan is airing its grievences is flamebaiting? Especially in light of the fact that the news about Pakistan's move to designate two Indians as terrorist was rejected has nothing to do with their grievances regarding the Kashmir issue? Seemed like they were throwing all their issues into one news piece.

#6 "Putting lipstick on a pig" is a very common term that has been used by Pakistanis several times when referring to Indians. Whining and Crying including the term "Randi Rona" is also something Pakistanis use very commonly. Not sure how this is flamebaiting

Nevertheless, I will delete those messages out of respect for you.
But please note that PDF Pakistanis and moderators expect Indians to have thick skin, but cant seem to handle it when the shoe is on the other foot.
Also note the fact that I didnt make any personal attack, but here you have an "elite" member saying this freely

Na Indian rat, by in large we don't give monkies to your sugardaddies. These exercises are important to hammer home the realities of the world and bring forth the filthy nature of geopolitics to the Pakistani citizens. "your terrorist is the hero of the others" , hopefully, from now on, there wont be any "Pakistani" on the UN list regardless what they did or did not do.

The hypocrisy in this case is not lost on us.

Post # 2 = Mocking
Post # 6 = Flamebaiting

Flamebaiting = a post which is very likely to invite inflamed responses from other members. Your post # 6 did as much.