What's new

UN refugee chief urges Pakistan not to label Afghan refugees 'terrorists'

Devil Soul

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
22,931
Reaction score
45
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
UN refugee chief urges Pakistan not to label Afghan refugees 'terrorists'
REUTERS — UPDATED ABOUT A MINUTE AGO
The United Nations (UN) High Commissioner for Refugees Filippo Grandi, right, talks to an Afghan refugee woman during his visit to the UNHCR's Repatriation Center in Peshawar.─AP
PESHAWAR: The United Nations refugee chief on Thursday urged Pakistanis not to blame Afghan refugees for terrorism in their country, amid growing public calls for their deportation and worsening relations between the two neighbours.

Warning that the roughly 2.5 million Afghan refugees in Pakistan risked becoming a “forgotten” crisis, UN High Commissioner for Refugees Filippo Grandi called on the international community to invest more funds to help them.

“My appeal is that, not only to the authorities but also to the local population: refugees as you know are not terrorists,” Grandi said during a visit to a repatriation centre outside Peshawar.

Related: Afghan govt seeks extension in stay of refugees in Pakistan

Pakistani officials have recently hinted at the possibility of deporting Afghan refugees, amid tense relations with Kabul.

A decision to renew their legal status by June 30 has not yet been announced, although past deadlines have been extended at the last minute.

The number of Afghans voluntarily returning home is down sharply this year as violence worsens in Afghanistan, where the government and its U.S. allies are fighting a stubborn Taliban insurgency.

So far, about 6,000 Afghans have chosen to return home from Pakistan in 2016, compared with 58,211 voluntary repatriations last year, according to the UNHCR.

A recent border spat between the two at the nearby Torkham crossing left four dead and thousands stranded.

On Monday, Adviser to Prime Minister on Foreign Affairs, Sartaj Aziz told SAMAA TV that Afghan refugee camps had become “safe havens for terrorists”.

Related: Afghan refugee camps 'safe havens' for terrorists: Aziz‏

On Wednesday, federal minister Abdul Qadir Baloch warned that Pakistan was not willing to host Afghan refugees indefinitely.

“In view of the security and socioeconomic impact, the tolerance level of the host communities has reached its threshold and cannot be overstretched,” he said, adding, however, that Pakistan would not use force to evict refugees.

Related: Pakistan hosts second largest refugee population globally

Pakistan has the second-largest refugee population in the world, with more than 1.5 million registered and about a million unregistered refugees from Afghanistan, most of whom fled the Soviet invasion in 1979.

UNHCR chief Grandi said he had made the case for extending the June 30 deadline to the government in talks during his two-day visit to Pakistan.

He also stressed the need for the international community to fund efforts to support Afghan refugees. “I have come here to the region on the week of World Refugee Day to highlight that Afghan refugees should not be forgotten,” he said.
 
. .
Here is an idea why dont they have their indian masters host them in india! As they love their indian masters so much. We should allow them to apply for refuge at the border crossing to the east.
 
. . . .
UNHRC can go screw itself. How do they know that these afghans are not involved.
 
.
Pakistan must ask why the labeling millions of Muslims terrorists?

Afghan refugees are respected all those not involved in terrorism, smuggling, narcotics and all other non writeable offences, do you find any Afghani living in Pakistan not involved in above said crimes?
 
.
Why would Pakistan even THINK of labeling all remaining Afghan refugees as terrorists?

...He also stressed the need for the international community to fund efforts to support Afghan refugees. “I have come here to the region on the week of World Refugee Day to highlight that Afghan refugees should not be forgotten,” he said.
He does have a point. International contributions through UNHCR, etc., don't cover what Pakistan itself has expended over the years to support Afghan refugees. I did a crude estimate last night, the difference since 1980 is something like $6 billion. (Pakistan's burden declined after the U.S. kicked the Taliban in late 2001, since Afghans started returning by the millions after that.)

However, when it comes to welcoming refugees, the Iranians probably did a better job than the Pakistanis. Because the Iranians scarcely got funds from the international community, yet treated the Afghan refugees quite well, as they could get jobs and their children receive education through high school: link. (I don't usually credit the mullahs with doing much good, but they appear to have earned it here.)
 
. .
Why not?he should also urge the world to stop labeling Pakistan as terrorists
 
.
First Question- Does UN has any existence in any valid reason worldwide ? <NO> We saw when Bosnia and Sarbia was in war situation. UN went their and told Bosnians Muslims to keep up their Arms to UN and after that they gifted unarmed Bosnian Muslims TO THE SARB force and world saw the what massacre happened. Thousands of Innocent Muslim Killed.

UN has no authorization to talk about Pakistan in this purpose. 2.5 million Afghan refugees in Pakistan risked becoming a “forgotten” crisis. Are they terrorist. They again and again trying to take step up of pakistani regime. Pakistan and their people will decide how they will treat with their brother . Not UN nor US. They are not our Master.
 
.
Why would Pakistan even THINK of labeling all remaining Afghan refugees as terrorists?

He does have a point. International contributions through UNHCR, etc., don't cover what Pakistan itself has expended over the years to support Afghan refugees. I did a crude estimate last night, the difference since 1980 is something like $6 billion. (Pakistan's burden declined after the U.S. kicked the Taliban in late 2001, since Afghans started returning by the millions after that.)

However, when it comes to welcoming refugees, the Iranians probably did a better job than the Pakistanis. Because the Iranians scarcely got funds from the international community, yet treated the Afghan refugees quite well, as they could get jobs and their children receive education through high school: link. (I don't usually credit the mullahs with doing much good, but they appear to have earned it here.)
Don't get upset ma non gentile brah. consider them Jews and take em into your land
 
.
yet treated the Afghan refugees quite well, as they could get jobs and their children receive education through high school: link. (I don't usually credit the mullahs with doing much good, but they appear to have earned it here.)

Iranians didn't let Afghans run amok all over their country. Pakistan was gifted on a plate to afghan refugees. Even now Afghan refugees work alongside land mafias, empty land in Karachi? No problem, bring some Afghans with guns, people back off because of crime and drugs.
 
.
Why would Pakistan even THINK of labeling all remaining Afghan refugees as terrorists?

He does have a point. International contributions through UNHCR, etc., don't cover what Pakistan itself has expended over the years to support Afghan refugees. I did a crude estimate last night, the difference since 1980 is something like $6 billion. (Pakistan's burden declined after the U.S. kicked the Taliban in late 2001, since Afghans started returning by the millions after that.)

And your crude estimates are full of shyt... Million returned? :lol:

Millions still live in Pakistan! What about them? How many refugees is USA taking ?


However, when it comes to welcoming refugees, the Iranians probably did a better job than the Pakistanis. Because the Iranians scarcely got funds from the international community, yet treated the Afghan refugees quite well, as they could get jobs and their children receive education through high school: link. (I don't usually credit the mullahs with doing much good, but they appear to have earned it here.)


BS;

Here is Iranian treatment ;


http://www.opendemocracy.net/opensecurity/afshin-shahi/plight-of-afghan-refugees-in-iran

http://www.khaama.com/afghan-students-humiliated-forced-to-eat-toilet-dirt-in-iran-9141


Iran literally keeps them fenced up.. They aren't allowed to travel anywhere or any such shyt your trying to brag about.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom