Ulema were against creation of Pakistan: Fawad

[Devil Soul]

Ulema were against creation of Pakistan: Fawad

Listen

ISLAMABAD: Science and Technology Minister Fawad Chaudhry on Sunday said the decision on how to run the country can’t be left to a Maulana, as most of the Ulema were against the creation of Pakistan.

He said the journey ahead for the country will be decided by the youth and technology will take the country forward. In Twitter messages, the minister said a new committee of experts has been established which would determine moon sighting for key dates and months in the Islamic calendar for the next 10 years, Geo News reported.



Related Stories

• Committee of experts formed to put an end to moon sighting controversies: Fawad
• Mufti Muneeb hits back at Fawad on moon controversy

The five-member committee will comprise science and technology experts from SUPARCO (Space and Upper Atmosphere Research Commission) and MET Office, Chaudhry wrote on Twitter.

The committee will prepare an Islamic calendar of important dates and months for the next 10 years, including Ramazan, Eid, and Muharram, which will put an end to the moon-sighting controversies that arise every year, the minister added.

Meanwhile, the Central Ruet-e-Hilal Committee chief Mufti Munibur Rehman strongly disagreed with Chaudhry and said that the minister is ‘unaware of religious matters’.

“Fawad Chaudhry is unaware of the system. He doesn’t even know that the committee meets at Suparco. I have previously appealed to the premier to let only concerned minister speak on religious issues. The science and technology minister doesn’t understand the sensitivity of the issue. He shouldn’t have a licence to speak on it,” he said.

Mufti Munib said history bears witness to immense sacrifices made by Ulema during the freedom movement, adding that it is not appropriate to cite the role of a few Ulema only to criticise the others.

“Fawad Chaudhry has a habit of making baseless claims to gain popularity. One must take caution while commenting on Ulema,” he said. “Our announcements regarding moon have never been wrong. Everyone bears witness when the moon is sighted. If you are fond of making a lunar calendar, then go ahead and make a calendar of 100 years instead of just 10,” he said.
https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/467441-ulema-were-against-creation-of-pakistan-fawad

 

[El Sidd]

Minister of Science and Technology cannot even help Mr. Fayyaz with his flying machine and believes that SUPARCO sent the hubble telescope.

His selection as Minister of Science and Technology speaks volume of his merit as judged by the True Leader himself.

The government is flaring up sectarian tensions in Pakistan as they did during the election campaign. I wonder if it was another IMF demand.

Anyhow let the Mullah bashing begin

3 2 1....

Start throwing fecal matters !!

 

[Maarkhoor]

Ulema were against creation of Pakistan: Fawad

Listen

ISLAMABAD: Science and Technology Minister Fawad Chaudhry on Sunday said the decision on how to run the country can’t be left to a Maulana, as most of the Ulema were against the creation of Pakistan.

He said the journey ahead for the country will be decided by the youth and technology will take the country forward. In Twitter messages, the minister said a new committee of experts has been established which would determine moon sighting for key dates and months in the Islamic calendar for the next 10 years, Geo News reported.



Related Stories

• Committee of experts formed to put an end to moon sighting controversies: Fawad
• Mufti Muneeb hits back at Fawad on moon controversy

The five-member committee will comprise science and technology experts from SUPARCO (Space and Upper Atmosphere Research Commission) and MET Office, Chaudhry wrote on Twitter.

The committee will prepare an Islamic calendar of important dates and months for the next 10 years, including Ramazan, Eid, and Muharram, which will put an end to the moon-sighting controversies that arise every year, the minister added.

Meanwhile, the Central Ruet-e-Hilal Committee chief Mufti Munibur Rehman strongly disagreed with Chaudhry and said that the minister is ‘unaware of religious matters’.

“Fawad Chaudhry is unaware of the system. He doesn’t even know that the committee meets at Suparco. I have previously appealed to the premier to let only concerned minister speak on religious issues. The science and technology minister doesn’t understand the sensitivity of the issue. He shouldn’t have a licence to speak on it,” he said.

Mufti Munib said history bears witness to immense sacrifices made by Ulema during the freedom movement, adding that it is not appropriate to cite the role of a few Ulema only to criticise the others.

“Fawad Chaudhry has a habit of making baseless claims to gain popularity. One must take caution while commenting on Ulema,” he said. “Our announcements regarding moon have never been wrong. Everyone bears witness when the moon is sighted. If you are fond of making a lunar calendar, then go ahead and make a calendar of 100 years instead of just 10,” he said.
https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/467441-ulema-were-against-creation-of-pakistan-fawad

They are even gave Fatwa against loud speaker and I have copy of the poster dated back early nineteens and see now They are using it at full scale.....They gave Fatwa against picture / T.V / Internet and now they are using these most.....

 

[Samlee]

They are even gave Fatwa against loud speaker and I have copy of the poster dated back early nineteens and see now They are using it at full scale.....They gave Fatwa against picture / T.V / Internet and now they are using these most.....

They Even Gave Fatwa Against Quaid e Azams Picture On Currency Note and Now Run After It The Most

Anyhow let the Mullah bashing begin

3 2 1....

Start throwing fecal matters !!

Halala Hungry Pervs

only deobandi sect was against not all Pro.chikoo fawad

Only Part of Deobandi Sect Not All

 

[Asimzranger]

only deobandi sect was against not all Prof.chikoo fawad

 

[M. Sarmad]

only deobandi sect was against not all Prof.chikoo fawad

Deoband Mullahs weren't the only ones who opposed Pakistan.


Ahmed Raza Khan, the founder of Barelvi Movement, had died in 1921 ... His son, Mustafa Raza Khan titled Mufti-e-Azam Hind preferred to stay in India. He died in 1980s and is buried in Bareili. Ahmed Raza had other sons too and one of them was Hamid Raza but he died in 1943 though he too never participated in the struggle for Pakistan's creation. None of Ahmed Raza's descendants live in Pakistan, in fact, they hate Pakistan. Barelvis were the ones who really gave the push but the Barelvi headquarters (Barelvi hierarchy; Ahmed Raza's son and other "Khalifas") were against Pakistan Movement .


And Shias too didn't support Pakistan Movement en masse ... Groups like "The Momins" and "Shia Conference" were aligned with Congress .. Maulana Mazhar Ali Azhar, the leader of the notorious "Ahrar" who called Jinnah "Kaafir e Azam", represented that he was a Shia, before the inquiry commission (see 1953 Munir Report)


Virtually every significant religious group in Undivided India, indeed the entire Muslim religious establishment was opposed to Jinnah and his Pakistan Movement.


Even the sanest among Ulema/Islamic scholars opposed Jinnah. For example, Allama Mashriqi Sahib

Allama Mashriqi (1888-1963) became a college Principal at the age of 25, and then became an Under Secretary, at the age of 29, in the Education Department of the Government of India. He wrote an exegesis of the Qur'an which was nominated for the 1925 Nobel Prize. He was offered an ambassadorship to Afghanistan at age 32, but he declined all honours.He subsequently resigned government service and in 1930 founded the Khaksar Movement, aiming to advance the condition of the masses irrespective of any faith, sect, or religion.



His weekly , Al-Islah (f.1934), indeed served to spread the Movement, which rose to become a Private Army (as referred to by Lord Linlithgow, Viceroy of India) of 5 million in less than a decade since its foundation and had over 6000 offices across India . In addition, the Al-Islah inspired others who copied the Khaksars and formed similar organizations. The weekly also helped to achieve Allama Mashriqi’s (founder of the Khaksar Tehrik) mission of instilling unity, strict discipline, equality, and self-less community service (regardless of religion) amongst millions of Khaksars.


Allama Masriqi and Khaksars, despite their tireless efforts and countless sacrifices for freedom of India, strongly opposed Partition and Jinnah's Pakistan Movement. Khaksars even tried to assassinate Jinnah.

 

[El Sidd]

Halala Hungry Pervs

look man i do not intend to discuss religion. its considered against forum rules and only a certain set of ideologue is allowed to be spread here on pdf from what i have observed.

So easy on the flame baiting man. its all relative.

 

[M. Sarmad]

Only Part of Deobandi Sect Not All

Only a very small section of the Deoband School was against joining the Congress.


The rising popularity of Muslim League shattered the confidence of other parties , They became restless , and Maulana Madani (Rector of Dar ul Uloom Deoband and president of Jamiat e Ulema e Hind) called a meeting (Sept 1945) . The meeting was attended by over 150 delegates from different parties and they decided to oppose the League`s Agenda Tooth and Nail and formed a Muslim Parliamentary Board

(Deoband Ulemas Movement for freedom of India by Dr. Farhat Tabassum , p.158)

The president of the Jamiat-ul-Ulema Husain Ahmad Madani went on to issue a fatwa in October 1945 declaring it Haram for Muslims to join the Muslim League ..

 

[CriticalThought]

only deobandi sect was against not all Prof.chikoo fawad

Only some amongst the Deobandis. Their desire was a complete Muslim rule over the entire sub-continent because the rule had been taken away from us. When it didn't materialize, they stayed back with the intention of safeguarding mosques. Mosque is dedicated to Allah and cannot be used for any other purpose until the Day of Judgement. Someone had to stay back to look after those. Words are cheap when you don't know the full context.

Only a very small section of the Deoband School was against joining the Congress.


The rising popularity of Muslim League shattered the confidence of other parties , They became restless , and Maulana Madani (Rector of Dar ul Uloom Deoband and president of Jamiat e Ulema e Hind) called a meeting (Sept 1945) . The meeting was attended by over 150 delegates from different parties and they decided to oppose the League`s Agenda Tooth and Nail and formed a Muslim Parliamentary Board

(Deoband Ulemas Movement for freedom of India by Dr. Farhat Tabassum , p.158)

The president of the Jamiat-ul-Ulema Husain Ahmad Madani went on to issue a fatwa in October 1945 declaring it Haram for Muslims to join the Muslim League ..

Please show us this Fatwa in writing.

 

[El Sidd]

Deoband Mullahs weren't the only ones who opposed Pakistan.


Ahmed Raza Khan, the founder of Barelvi Movement, had died in 1921 ... His son, Mustafa Raza Khan titled Mufti-e-Azam Hind preferred to stay in India. He died in 1980s and is buried in Bareili. Ahmed Raza had other sons too and one of them was Hamid Raza but he died in 1943 though he too never participated in the struggle for Pakistan's creation. None of Ahmed Raza's descendants live in Pakistan, in fact, they hate Pakistan. Barelvis were the ones who really gave the push but the Barelvi headquarters (Barelvi hierarchy; Ahmed Raza's son and other "Khalifas") were against Pakistan Movement .


And Shias too didn't support Pakistan Movement en masse ... Groups like "The Momins" and "Shia Conference" were aligned with Congress .. Maulana Mazhar Ali Azhar, the leader of the notorious "Ahrar" who called Jinnah "Kaafir e Azam", represented that he was a Shia, before the inquiry commission (see 1953 Munir Report)


Virtually every significant religious group in Undivided India, indeed the entire Muslim religious establishment was opposed to Jinnah and his Pakistan Movement.


Even the sanest among Ulema/Islamic scholars opposed Jinnah. For example, Allama Mashriqi Sahib

Allama Mashriqi (1888-1963) became a college Principal at the age of 25, and then became an Under Secretary, at the age of 29, in the Education Department of the Government of India. He wrote an exegesis of the Qur'an which was nominated for the 1925 Nobel Prize. He was offered an ambassadorship to Afghanistan at age 32, but he declined all honours.He subsequently resigned government service and in 1930 founded the Khaksar Movement, aiming to advance the condition of the masses irrespective of any faith, sect, or religion.



His weekly , Al-Islah (f.1934), indeed served to spread the Movement, which rose to become a Private Army (as referred to by Lord Linlithgow, Viceroy of India) of 5 million in less than a decade since its foundation and had over 6000 offices across India . In addition, the Al-Islah inspired others who copied the Khaksars and formed similar organizations. The weekly also helped to achieve Allama Mashriqi’s (founder of the Khaksar Tehrik) mission of instilling unity, strict discipline, equality, and self-less community service (regardless of religion) amongst millions of Khaksars.


Allama Masriqi and Khaksars, despite their tireless efforts and countless sacrifices for freedom of India, strongly opposed Partition and Jinnah's Pakistan Movement. Khaksars even tried to assassinate Jinnah.

Instead of going through historical debate on if the crow was black or grey. Why cant the government legislate that school of thought in religion should be from within the country.

Bareilly is a town in India.
Deoband is a town in India.
Shias also report to religious clergy outside of Pakistan.
Qadiyanis too.

Why cant they all have a Pakistani origin of school of thought? Its much easier to tackle this than to say we have taken a uturn on our ideological creation and now we are congress Mullah?

 

[CriticalThought]

Instead of going through historical debate on if the crow was black or grey. Why cant the government legislate that school of thought in religion should be from within the country.

Bareilly is a town in India.
Deoband is a town in India.
Shias also report to religious clergy outside of Pakistan.
Qadiyanis too.

Why cant they all have a Pakistani origin of school of thought? Its much easier to tackle this than to say we have taken a uturn on our ideological creation and now we are congress Mullah?

Uhhh Islam came from Mecca and Medina actually. Why are you calling for a Deen-e-Ilahi?

 

[El Sidd]

Uhhh Islam came from Mecca and Medina actually. Why are you calling for a Deen-e-Ilahi?

Islam actually came from the Quran which was given to the prophet born in Hejaz.

Deen i Ilahi would be what the government is trying to achieve under the guise of sectarian harmony.

 

[war&peace]

Says a rejected & failed libtard who has no credibility or competency except TC.
He is lying since he is over-generalising the act of few who can be counted on fingers and belong to Deoband only. Rest of the scholars supported the creation of Pakistan and call Quaid-e-Azam as Rahmatullah Alaih.

Islam actually came from the Quran which was given to the prophet born in Hejaz.

Deen i Ilahi would be what the government is trying to achieve under the guise of sectarian harmony.

The angels didn't whisk you away this year or there's wifi in Jamarat?

 

[El Sidd]

The angels didn't whisk you away this year or there's wifi in Jamarat?

Why are you questioning your faith over it Chicken lasagne?

 

[Imran Khan]

Ulema always stand on wrong side of histpry