Wood
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2013
- Messages
- 4,839
- Reaction score
- -10
- Country
- Location
You may have misunderstood me. I was just trying to say that UK gov. does not care for Kashmir. The title of the article makes it sound like UK was authoritatively directed to take action against India. This is typical TRT against India. I consider TRT to be Turkish version of Indian WIONThe gunman that took people hostage in Texas had nothing to do with the UK either. Doesn’t mean there wasn’t action required in the UK or not although in this case it really isn’t UK jurisdiction to declare anything other than a statement if they provide it. Same as India sending a kerala born man to protest as “Baloch” in the Czech Republic.
PS: But since you've brought up the Texas gunman, why does he have nothing to do with UK? I thought he was a UK citizen.
TRT has always been at it.As a legend once said, it’s not about the money, it’s about sending a message.
But seriously, this sort of negative press is very much due to you now, even if the consequences of it aren’t as easily levied on a country like Myanmar for example.
Western countries do not want to trade with India because they think India is benevolent or that it is a force of good. They don't really care about what India (or any country for that matter) is up to until it is against their self interest. TRT aside, even if NYT, WSJ etc. keep pumping daily defamation columns against India - it will be business as usual