What's new

U.S. touts new evidence of Iranian weaponry in Yemen, Afghanistan

sammuel

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Dec 14, 2017
Messages
3,266
Reaction score
2
Country
Israel
Location
Israel
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States on Thursday displayed pieces of what it said were Iranian weapons deployed to militants in Yemen and Afghanistan, a move by President Donald Trump’s administration to pressure Tehran to curb its regional activities.

The presentation of hardware by the Pentagon, much of which was handed over by Saudi Arabia, coincides with growing concern in Congress over U.S. military support for the Saudi-led coalition in Yemen’s civil war, which has led to a deep humanitarian crisis.

Members of Congress have escalated their opposition to Saudi Arabia after the October killing of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi. Despite administration pleas not to downgrade ties with the Saudis and thereby counter Iran, the Senate voted on Wednesday to advance a resolution to end military support for the Saudis in Yemen.

If Iran were found to be shipping arms to Yemen, Afghanistan and other countries, it would be in violation of U.N. resolutions.

We want there to be no doubt across the world that this is a priority for the United States and that it’s in international interest to address it,” said Katie Wheelbarger, the principal deputy assistant secretary of defense for international security affairs.

The presentation, the second such one in the last year, is part of a government-wide effort to take a harder line toward Tehran.

Iran has denied supplying the Houthis in Yemen with such weaponry and described the Pentagon’s previous arms display as “fabricated.

WEAPONS TO YEMEN
The Pentagon offered a detailed explanation of why it believed the arms on display came from Iran, noting what it said were Iranian corporate logos on arms fragments and the unique nature of the designs of Iranian weaponry.

The United States acknowledged it could not say precisely when the weapons were transferred to the Houthis, and, in some cases, could not say when they were used. There was no immediate way to independently verify where the weapons were made or employed.

This included a “Sayyad-2” surface to air missile, which the Pentagon said had been interdicted by the Saudi government in early 2018 on the way to Houthi militants in Yemen.

The Pentagon cited a corporate logo of an Iranian defense firm in the warhead section, which was not displayed, and writing in Farsi on the missile as evidence that it was Iranian.

A U.S. defense official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, acknowledged that the Pentagon did not know if the Houthis had actually used this type of missile before.

The Houthis, who control Yemen’s capital Sanaa, have fired dozens of missiles into Saudi Arabia in recent months, part of a three-year-old conflict that is a proxy battle between Saudi Arabia and Iran.

Under a U.N. resolution, Tehran is prohibited from supplying, selling or transferring weapons outside the country unless approved by the Security Council. A separate U.N. resolution on Yemen bans the supply of weapons to Houthi leaders.

It was unclear what impact, if any, such public displays of weaponry will have on Iran, U.S. allies and militants in the region.

A short-range missile on display was fired just five days after U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley did a similar presentation last year.

“I haven’t heard anybody say this is a political stunt. This is simply putting out in broad daylight Iran’s missiles and small arms and rockets and UAVs and drones,” U.S. special envoy for Iran, Brian Hook, told a news conference on Thursday after being asked whether the weapons display was done for propaganda reasons.

Hook said that today Houthi rebels had fired missiles into Saudi Arabia and that while the United States had the military option on the table, the preference was to use diplomatic efforts to deal with Iran.

The United States has also long accused Iran of providing weapons to Taliban militants in Afghanistan.

The Pentagon on Thursday displayed a number of “Fadjr” rockets, that it said had been provided to the Taliban. It said they were Iranian because of the unique markings on the rockets and the paint scheme, along with the markings on them.

The Taliban is known to buy weapons on the black market and defense officials could not say why they were sure these missiles and other weapons had not been simply bought by the militants.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...n-weaponry-in-yemen-afghanistan-idUSKCN1NY1XL

State Department Briefs Press on Iran's Weapons Violations
https://www.dvidshub.net/video/643891/state-department-briefs-press-irans-weapons-violations
 
.
Theres really nothing quite like good old vicious bloodthirsty western hypocrisy at its finest.
282.gif

"EVERYONE QUICKLY GET BACK!!.That so called article is putting out so much pure BS that the bullsh!t-O-meter is literally about to sh!t itself...its off the scale!."
"That much pure BS is extremely hazardous to human life,not to mention it really stinks,we must evacuate immediately!"
 
.
A U.S. defense official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, acknowledged that the Pentagon did not know if the Houthis had actually used this type of missile before.
The presentation, the second such one in the last year, is part of a government-wide effort to take a harder line toward Tehran.
The United States acknowledged it could not say precisely when the weapons were transferred to the Houthis, and, in some cases, could not say when they were used. There was no immediate way to independently verify where the weapons were made or employed.
The Pentagon cited a corporate logo of an Iranian defense firm in the warhead section, which was not displayed, and writing in Farsi on the missile as evidence that it was Iranian.
A U.S. defense official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, acknowledged that the Pentagon did not know if the Houthis had actually used this type of missile before.
The Taliban is known to buy weapons on the black market and defense officials could not say why they were sure these missiles and other weapons had not been simply bought by the militants.
For Gods sake , are they making a comedy or these are supposed to be evidence against Iran
This included a “Sayyad-2” surface to air missile, which the Pentagon said had been interdicted by the Saudi government in early 2018 on the way to Houthi militants in Yemen.
What's the use of Sayyad 2 for Houthis , we even didn't gave that to Hezbollah that far better knew how to use it , alo what's the use of that missile without it's launcher ,and if we gave that type of missile to houthis why nobody ever seen it's use in Yemen. please don't tell me KSA and UAE airplanes are invisible to the missile. in truth that Sayyad 2 is just a repainted standard missile nothing more and just serve as propaganda tool for white house and trump
 
. .
What's the use of Sayyad 2 for Houthis , we even didn't gave that to Hezbollah that far better knew how to use it , alo what's the use of that missile without it's launcher ,and if we gave that type of missile to houthis why nobody ever seen it's use in Yemen. please don't tell me KSA and UAE airplanes are invisible to the missile. in truth that Sayyad 2 is just a repainted standard missile nothing more and just serve as propaganda tool for white house and trump

I am no missile expert but fact is that missiles where flying from Yemen and Iran is the main suspect of supplying those missiles.

Now why would Iran Help to fire missiles to a neighboring country ?


~
 
.
Those missiles are called Scud and iran didn't have originally . only saddam and lybia had , lybia gave some to iran in the iraq war . they are 60s technology of the USSR . they are not sophisticated to replicate or mass produce .


Scud is the name of a series of tactical ballistic missiles developed by the Soviet Union during the Cold War. It was exported widely to both Second and Third World countries. The term comes from the NATO reporting name attached to the missile by Western intelligence agencies. The Russian names for the missile are the R-11 (the first version), and the R-17 (later R-300) Elbrus (later developments). The name Scud has been widely used to refer to these missiles and the wide variety of derivative variants developed in other countries based on the Soviet design.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scud


280px-Scud_missile_on_TEL_vehicle%2C_National_Museum_of_Military_History%2C_Bulgaria.jpg




scud is easy to confuse illiterate people , what iran has is upgraded scud with home made flight electronics and perhaps guidance system of russian Glonaz sat . what yemen has is scud .
 
.
Those missiles are called Scud and iran didn't have originally . only saddam and lybia had , lybia gave some to iran in the iraq war . they are 60s technology of the USSR . they are not sophisticated to replicate or mass produce .


Scud is the name of a series of tactical ballistic missiles developed by the Soviet Union during the Cold War. It was exported widely to both Second and Third World countries. The term comes from the NATO reporting name attached to the missile by Western intelligence agencies. The Russian names for the missile are the R-11 (the first version), and the R-17 (later R-300) Elbrus (later developments). The name Scud has been widely used to refer to these missiles and the wide variety of derivative variants developed in other countries based on the Soviet design.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scud


280px-Scud_missile_on_TEL_vehicle%2C_National_Museum_of_Military_History%2C_Bulgaria.jpg




scud is easy to confuse illiterate people , what iran has is upgraded scud with home made flight electronics and perhaps guidance system of russian Glonaz sat . what yemen has is scud .

Theres really nothing quite like good old vicious bloodthirsty western hypocrisy at its finest.
282.gif

"EVERYONE QUICKLY GET BACK!!.That so called article is putting out so much pure BS that the bullsh!t-O-meter is literally about to sh!t itself...its off the scale!."
"That much pure BS is extremely hazardous to human life,not to mention it really stinks,we must evacuate immediately!"
For Gods sake , are they making a comedy or these are supposed to be evidence against Iran

What's the use of Sayyad 2 for Houthis , we even didn't gave that to Hezbollah that far better knew how to use it , alo what's the use of that missile without it's launcher ,and if we gave that type of missile to houthis why nobody ever seen it's use in Yemen. please don't tell me KSA and UAE airplanes are invisible to the missile. in truth that Sayyad 2 is just a repainted standard missile nothing more and just serve as propaganda tool for white house and trump
The US sold weapons like TOW to Iran in the 1970s to butcher Arabs. Iran reverse engineered it. The responsibility is on the US.


Ok , so lets put the weapon supply aside for a moment.

Are you saying that Saudi is concerned about Iran for no reason ?

Saudi is willing now to pour billions of oil barrels into the market to reduce the price of its main product. Clearly Saudis have genaume concerns in that matter. No need to repeat the fact that Saudi is the larger exporter of oil in the world. If you temper with them you temper with global economy.

Only an irresponsible regime would not understand that threatening Saudi is playing with fire. And the mullah regime is directly responsible for decades of bad diplomacy and unnecessary conflicts.

~
 
.
Beside long history of American military coup, invasion and supporting dictators which are not only against basis of human law are no in tune with international law they talking about this region per se as far as they are not a part of this region is interfering in internal affairs of this region ..
They have occupied Afghanistan and now are upset of Iran's presence in this country? well your stupid policy with help of Saudi Maddares led to creation of extremists made all this mess .. just 3.5 million Afghan refuges live in Iran, opium, terrorism beside suffering of people are fruits of your job.


American are so funny ...
 
.
I am no missile expert but fact is that missiles where flying from Yemen and Iran is the main suspect of supplying those missiles.

Now why would Iran Help to fire missiles to a neighboring country ?


~
who says Iran is the origin are your evidence the same as what was mentioned i the article . also he funny part is that those missile are fired by Yemen Army not Houthis , and UN resolution says not to give weapon to Houthis .

also no body yet answered one question of me how we managed to sell those 16m long an 1.25m wide missiles to a country who has no border with us and is under siege from earth , air and sea and 24h a day is under satellite observation all around the Yemen is sourrounded with armies and mercenaries from more than 30 country and its 3 years that we neither send an airplane nor a ship to that country.

Ok , so lets put the weapon supply aside for a moment.

Are you saying that Saudi is concerned about Iran for no reason ?

Saudi is willing now to pour billions of oil barrels into the market to reduce the price of its main product. Clearly Saudis have genaume concerns in that matter. No need to repeat the fact that Saudi is the larger exporter of oil in the world. If you temper with them you temper with global economy.

Only an irresponsible regime would not understand that threatening Saudi is playing with fire. And the mullah regime is directly responsible for decades of bad diplomacy and unnecessary conflicts.

~
is it Iran responsibility if some others feel insecure or have some paranoia complex ?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom