What's new

U.S. tests ways to sweep space clean of radiation after nuclear attack

Bogeyman

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Nov 21, 2019
Messages
534
Reaction score
0
Country
Turkey
Location
Turkey
ca_0103NID_Starfish_Prime_Aurorae.jpg


The U.S. military thought it had cleared the decks when, on 9 July 1962, it heaved a 1.4-megaton nuclear bomb some 400 kilometers into space: Orbiting satellites were safely out of range of the blast. But in the months that followed the test, called Starfish Prime, satellites began to wink out one by one, including the world’s first communications satellite, Telstar. There was an unexpected aftereffect: High-energy electrons, shed by radioactive debris and trapped by Earth’s magnetic field, were fritzing out the satellites’ electronics and solar panels.

Starfish Prime and similar Soviet tests might be dismissed as Cold War misadventures, never to be repeated. After all, what nuclear power would want to pollute space with particles that could take out its own satellites, critical for communication, navigation, and surveillance? But military planners fear North Korea might be an exception: It has nuclear weapons but not a single functioning satellite among the thousands now in orbit. They quietly refer to a surprise orbital blast as a potential “Pearl Harbor of space.”

And so, without fanfare, defense scientists are trying to devise a cure. Three space experiments—one now in orbit and two being readied for launch in 2021—aim to gather data on how to drain high-energy electrons trapped by Earth’s magnetic field in radiation belts encircling the planet. The process, called radiation belt remediation (RBR), already happens naturally, when radio waves from deep space or from Earth—our own radio chatter, for example, or emissions from lightning—knock electrons trapped in Earth’s Van Allen radiation belts into the upper atmosphere, where they quickly shed energy, often triggering aurorae.

“Natural precipitation happens all the time,” says Craig Rodger, a space physicist at the University of Otago. But it would not nearly be fast enough to drain nuclear-charged radiation belts, where electron fluxes can be millions of times higher than in Earth’s Van Allen belts.

Scientists got a glimpse of a potential solution from NASA’s Van Allen Probes, which launched in 2012 and ducked in and out of Earth’s radiation belts until the mission ended last summer. It offered a deep dive into natural remediation processes, showing how radio waves resonate with high-energy electrons, scattering them down the magnetic field lines and sweeping them out of the belts. “Compared to 10 years ago, we just know so much more about how these wave-particle interactions work,” says Geoff Reeves, a space physicist at Los Alamos National Laboratory.

Now, researchers are ready to try artificial remediation, by beaming radio waves into the belts. Physicists have tested using the U.S. Navy’s very low frequency (VLF) antenna towers, powerful facilities used to communicate with submarines, says Dan Baker, director of the Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics at the University of Colorado, Boulder, and a lead investigator on the Van Allen Probes. The antennae of the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program in Alaska and the giant dish of the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico might also be enlisted to generate cleansing radio beams.

An orbiting RBR platform, closer to the target, could be more effective. In June 2019, the U.S. Air Force launched what it bills as the largest uncrewed structure ever flown in space: the DSX dipole antenna. Nearly as long as a U.S. football field, DSX’s primary mission is to transmit VLF waves into the Van Allen belts and measure precipitating particles with onboard detectors. “It’s a new way to prod the belts and explore basic questions in space physics,” says DSX’s principal investigator, James McCollough at the Air Force Research Laboratory.

A team of scientists at Los Alamos and NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center is spearheading a second experiment in VLF precipitation. In April 2021, the team plans to launch a sounding rocket carrying the Beam Plasma Interactions Experiment, a miniature accelerator that would create a beam of electrons, which in turn would generate VLF waves capable of sweeping up particles. Reeves, who leads the experiment, believes the compact electron accelerator could ultimately be a better broom than a gigantic VLF antenna. “If we validate it with this experiment, we have a lot more confidence we can scale it up to higher power,” he says.

A third experiment would coax the atmosphere itself to kick up turbulent waves that would draw down electrons. In the summer of 2021, the Naval Research Laboratory plans to launch a mission called the Space Measurements of a Rocket-Released Turbulence. A sounding rocket will fly into the ionosphere—an atmospheric layer hundreds of kilometers up that’s awash in ions and electrons—and eject 1.5 kilograms of barium atoms. Ionized by sunlight, the barium would create a ring of moving plasma that emits radio waves: essentially a space version of a magnetron, the gadget used in microwave ovens.

The missions should help show which RBR system is most feasible, although an operational system may be years off. Whatever the technology, it could bring risks. A full-scale space cleanup might dump as much energy into the upper atmosphere as the geomagnetic storms caused by the Sun’s occasional eruptions. Like them, it could disrupt airplane navigation and communication. And it would spawn heaps of nitrogen oxides and hydrogen oxides, which could eat away at the stratospheric ozone layer. “We don’t know how great the effect would be,” says Allison Jaynes, a space physicist at the University of Iowa.

Besides safeguarding against a nuclear burst, RBR technology could have a civilian dividend, Jaynes notes. NASA and other space agencies have long wrestled with shielding astronauts from the Van Allen belts and other sources of radiation on their way to and from deep space. VLF transmitters might be used to clear out high-energy electrons just before a spacecraft enters a danger zone. “When we become more active space travelers,” she says, “it could provide a safe passage through the radiation belts.”
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/201...ep-space-clean-radiation-after-nuclear-attack
 
.


'STARFISH PRIME' ON 9 JULY 1962: THE NIGHT SKY OVER HONOLULU
CAST IN A THERMONUCLEAR GLOW

HOME/TESTING TIMES
  • Facebook Like-Dummy
  • Tweet this-Dummy
  • Einstellungen
9 JULY 1962
'STARFISH PRIME', OUTER SPACE

A ‘Thor’ intermediate range ballistic missile was used for the U.S. high-altitude test.
On 9 July 1962, the United States conducted the ‘Starfish Prime’ nuclear test, one of a series of five aimed at testing the effects of nuclear weapons in high altitudes / lower outer space. The explosion took place 400 kilometres above the Johnston Atoll in the Northern Pacific Ocean. It had an explosive yield of 1.45 megatons - approximately a hundred times that of the Hiroshima bomb (around 13 kilotons).


The event took place at the height of the Cold War and its nuclear arms race. Shortly before, in October 1961, the Soviet Union had conducted the largest-ever nuclear explosion, the 50 megaton Tsar Bomb. In 1962, political tension found its expression in an all-time high of nuclear testing: 178 tests - more than twice the annual Cold War average (see chart). Only three months after ‘Starfish Prime’, the world found itself at the brink of nuclear war during the Cuban Missile Crisis.

The Van Allen belts (credit: NASA)

Starfish’s artificial aurora seen from an airplane.

The ‘Starfish Prime’ test experimented with radiation belts in the Earth’s magnetosphere known as Van Allen belts, they consist of energetic particles located in the inner region of Earth’s magnetosphere. James Van Allen had discovered them shortly before, in 1958, and agreed to cooperate with the military in a study on how they could be disrupted by nuclear explosions.

The consequences for the magnetosphere were completely unpredictable at the time. Also its crucial role in shielding life from solar winds was not understood until later. The Starfish Prime test resulted in a temporary alteration of the shape and intensity of the lower Van Allen belt, which created artificial aurora borealis that could be seen across the Pacific Ocean, from Hawaii to New Zealand.

One of Starfish’s victims – Telstar, the first commercial relay communication satellite ever.
The test also revealed the destructive impact of the Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) produced by a nuclear explosion. Located at more than 1,300 kilometers from the test site, the Hawaiian Island of Oahu received a power surge that knocked out numerous electric devices. The damage to both civilian and military electrical systems led physicist Lowell Wood to declare that if the Starfish test had taken place at the Nevada test site, the consequences “would still be indelibly imprinted in the minds of citizenry of the western U.S., as well as in history books.”


The radiation from this and other high-altitude nuclear tests also created an artificial radiation belt that, together with the EMPs, damaged or destroyed as many as one third of the satellites in lower earth orbit at the time.

President William J. Clinton of the United States signs the CTBT. UN Photo by Evan Schneider.
The United States conducted its last nuclear test three decades later, in 1992. It was the first country to sign the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) when it opened for signature on 24 September 1996. Today, it is one of the eight Annex 2 States that have yet to ratify before the Treaty can enter into force. The others are China, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Egypt, India, Iran, Israel and Pakistan.

External links:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom