What's new

U.S. seeks bigger role assisting Pakistani forces

t-birds

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Sep 27, 2007
Messages
323
Reaction score
0
By David Morgan and Kristin Roberts

WASHINGTON, Feb 6 (Reuters) - Pakistan must learn how to fight al Qaeda and the Taliban after years of preparing for a more traditional contest with India, Pentagon chief Robert Gates said on Wednesday, reiterating a U.S. offer to help.

The U.S. defense secretary said Pakistan realized only in recent months that al Qaeda posed a threat to the government of President Pervez Musharraf. He said the assassination of former prime minister and opposition leader Benazir Bhutto in December underscored that threat.

"All of a sudden what had been a nuisance is becoming a threat to the existence of the government," Gates said.

"The Pakistani army is an army that essentially has been trained and equipped to potentially fight India. They are now going to have to reorient themselves and figure out how to do counterinsurgency," he said.

The U.S. military is growing more concerned about security in nuclear-armed Pakistan and wants to play a bigger role in the state's counterterrorism fight.

Washington already gives millions of dollars annually to Pakistan for security-related assistance -- funds that have totaled $10 billion since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

But in the face of growing instability, a suicide bomb campaign and the regrouping of al Qaeda in Pakistan's tribal areas, the Pentagon has offered to step up its training of Pakistani forces as part of a new $750 million program.

Michael Vickers, assistant defense secretary for special operations and low-intensity conflict, said sites are being chosen for a five-year program to train and equip the Frontier Corps, a paramilitary unit, to confront al Qaeda and the Taliban in Pakistan's northwestern tribal region.

The Pentagon also has offered to send U.S. troops into Pakistan for joint operations with the Pakistani military in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas, or FATA, where al Qaeda has regenerated over the past 18 months.

But Pakistani leaders have publicly rejected the idea of U.S. forces operating inside Pakistan, fearing it could trigger a backlash from fiercely independent Pashtun tribes living on the border with Afghanistan -- a concern Gates said he understood.

Still, Vickers said assistance could go beyond training.

"Training assistance is very important, but could extend to some other areas as well," he said.

U.S. special forces could quietly help Pakistan with intelligence and reconnaissance, he said.

"We have a lot of capabilities that we can do in a low-visibility manner," Vickers said.

A missile attack, apparently carried out by a U.S. drone, killed a senior al Qaeda figure in the region last week, according to Pakistani and U.S. officials.

Navy Adm. Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, is expected to travel to Pakistan soon to discuss the security situation.

Defense officials say there are fewer than 100 U.S. troops now in Pakistan, most involved in U.S. Embassy operations. About two dozen are involved in counterterrorism and counter-narcotics training. (Editing by Will Dunham and Eric Walsh)
 
"All of a sudden what had been a nuisance is becoming a threat to the existence of the government," Gates said.
 
It would be better for the US to focus on afghanistan which is becoming more of a nuisance and which is the main pakistan is also suffering and let us handle our own matters instead of coming up with their creative ideas of sending US army personal in pakistan. The only area we need to work on is the COIN, the rest we are very much capable of handling these issues, we donot need more mess then we are already in. Majority of the pakistanies, and i'm talking about the modest ones, do not like and trust US one bit, US needs to understand this reality, coming into pakistan or threatning it, putting pressure on the GOP can result in serious repercussions.
 
It would be better for the US to focus on afghanistan which is becoming more of a nuisance and which is the main pakistan is also suffering and let us handle our own matters instead of coming up with their creative ideas of sending US army personal in pakistan. The only area we need to work on is the COIN, the rest we are very much capable of handling these issues, we donot need more mess then we are already in. Majority of the pakistanies, and i'm talking about the modest ones, do not like and trust US one bit, US needs to understand this reality, coming into pakistan or threatning it, putting pressure on the GOP can result in serious repercussions.

ice - i think both the US and GoP realise this andthat is why they have decided to increase military-to-military intell sharing and seeing how the US can help upgrade pak capabilities like COIN, FC etc.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom