What's new

U.S. news media avoid Islam cartoons linked to deadly attack in Paris

For the sake of argument, I'm an artist. Want to see my art?

23DF70C000000578-2865576-image-a-27_1418052688101.jpg


Caption: Indian men raping women


Do you like it?

Has this cartoonist been killed yet? No? Do you see the difference between you and them?
 
.
Leading U.S. news outlets mostly declined to show controversial cartoons of the Muslim Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) on Wednesday after suspected Islamist gunmen in Paris killed 12 people at the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo.

Online news sources the Daily Beast and Slate published the cartoons, but major U.S. publications, including the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, Reuters and the Associated Press, did not. Some said their guidelines call for avoiding publishing images or other material intended at offending religious sensibilities.

“After careful consideration, Times editors decided that describing the cartoons in question would give readers sufficient information to understand today’s story,” New York Times Company spokeswoman Danielle Rhoades Ha said

Bill Marimow, editor of the Philadelphia Inquirer, told media, “We will not under any circumstances run the cartoons. The idea of gratuitously insulting tens of millions of Muslim people rather than describing something in words is not a close call.”

Representatives at Reuters, Slate and the Daily Beast did not immediately return calls seeking comment. The Associated Press has a long-standing policy of refraining from using provocative images, spokesman Paul Colford said.

Charlie Hebdo (Charlie Weekly) is well known for courting controversy with satirical attacks on political and religious leaders of all faiths.

The hooded attackers stormed the Paris offices. During the attack, one of the assailants was captured on video outside the building shouting “We have killed Charlie Hebdo. We have avenged the prophet.”

Many Muslims believe it is blasphemous to create pictures of the Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) and Jihadists online repeatedly warned that the magazine would pay for its ridicule.

The Wall Street Journal’s coverage included a handful of provocative cartoons from Charlie Hebdo, some of them poking fun at major religions including Islam, but none of them depicted Mohammad (PBUH)

“Our global news staff is dedicated to reporting and publishing the news and explaining its context and we will continue to do so, despite today’s horrific events, and in doing so we rededicate ourselves every day to the central values of press freedom,” Gerard Baker, editor in chief of the Journal, said in an emailed statement.

The Associated Press said it cropped a 2012 photo of Charlie Hebdo editor Stephane Charbonnier, killed in the attack, to exclude a cartoon of Mohammad on a magazine he held in his hands.
U.S. news media avoid Islam cartoons linked to deadly attack in Paris | Pakistan Today

The American press is constituted of cowards and weaklings. No wonder America is in such steep and rapid decline.
 
.
And that draws NO reaction from Hindus? And even more so, is that fair to Hindus? What is the benefit of ridiculing Hindu gods? And should we judge Hindus who react to such humiliations? Actually, why not stop the humiliation and hurt in the first place????

Sure it does, at best they go around vandalizing shops and theaters. No one is exonerating them here. It is stupid, and only exposes an insecure faith and an inane urge to protect an all-powerful supreme being, just as it does for the muslims. The recourse in both the cases is to approach the courts.

The difference is that some 100 people including publishers,translators, rioters, and innocent bystanders died because of a book Salman Rushdie wrote. No recent parallel in Hinduism comes even close. A HUGE gap in scale.
 
.
Sensible decisions by US media. freedom of speech has its limits. It should not cross red lines and one of those is hurting religious sensitivities of people.



Cowards for not being brainless bigots?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom