What's new

U.S. gives $225 million worth of conditional assistance to Pakistan

Trump the idiot come himself with his stupid commander of Army in Afghanistan and apology what they said publicly. We don't want state department come forward to save president axx.
Second tell them loudly we decide how to deal with northern scums and kick out Indian presence from Afghanistan.
And we don't need your bloody aid pay us NATO supply routes with double IF we charging them already.
 
.
Pakistan should not accept this money. We are better off without American aid.
 
.
Nothing has changed, don't worry. Whether or not we receive aid and how we receive it shouldn't be used exaggerated the underlying relations.

The aid is essentially some of the only leverage they have to use against Pakistan, that and F-16s and other military equipment. Anytime they dislike the current arrangements, they'll threaten to change, tweak or remove aid and other measures. Pakistan however, for years has refused to comply with the US' ridiculous and endless demands.
US is like a bitchy gf... which threatens Pak with refusin pussy.... :lol:

And than when Pak rejects....she sweetens the deal a bit.
 
.
Pakistan must kick on their back and stop NATO supply. We don't want any shit from them

Or just impose a hefty duty on all trucks, reject this offer and make a billion dollars from the supply every year. No need to get the money under a this pathetic term "aid" ...please for dignity and sovereignty's sake. Stop the NATO supplies until the aunt sam accepts Pakistan's conditions or let her airlift even packs of biscuits for her soldiers.
 
.
Is that the price they have set for us? Send it back with some rubber bands....






The move comes, at a time when the relationship between the two countries have strained.

Pakistan has cancelled at least three high profile meetings with senior American officials, including a visit of Pakistan Foreign Minister Khawaja Asif to the US to meet Secretary of State Rex Tillerson.

Pakistan National Assembly passed a resolution alleging that the recent statements of the US President and his senior officials on Pakistan were hostile and threatening.

The US, however, insists that it wants Pakistan to take action against terrorist groups.

According to the report, State Department officials have said Mr. Trump’s promised changes will bring “explicit” conditions on military aid.

“Once Pakistan more aggressively pursues the Taliban and Haqqani network, the aid will be released — a determination to be made by Secretary of State Tillerson,” officials were quoted by the report as saying.

The $ 255 million in military assistance was the largest portion of $ 1.1 billion in aid authorised by Congress in 2016 that also included money for counter narcotics operations and health initiatives, the daily reported.

The US has provided Pakistan more than USD 33 billion in aid since 2002.

“If the State Department had failed to notify Congress in the next few weeks of its intention to spend the money, it would have been returned to the United States Treasury,” it said.

Early in the day, the State Department said it wants Pakistan take decisive action against terrorist groups and safe havens.

“We value our cooperation with Pakistan and want to see it continue,” a State Department spokesperson told PTI.

“The President has been clear that we are looking to the Pakistani government to take decisive action against militant groups based in Pakistan that are a threat to the region. It is vital to US interests that Pakistan prevent terrorist sanctuaries,” the spokesperson said.

After Trump’s policy announcement last week, there has been sharp reaction from Pakistan, which has accused the US of making unjustified allegations against it.
 
.
Trump is one miser president, I doubt he will give penny. This is again so called assistance for using our roads which will be cleared in duo time. And Trump will still blame Pakistan.
 
. .

India is not fighting someone's else war. The assistance Pakistan is getting is fighting US war. So Pakistan is acting as mercenaries killing its people and US paying you for that.

Assistance to India is over a period of 65 years for development work not military aid.

Excerpts from the same link you pasted.

The difference between India and U.S client states such as Israel, Pakistan, Egypt, South Korea and others becomes all the more stark when one examines the American military assistance - negligible in the case of India -- to these countries. In addition to the $ 65.1 billion in economic aid, Israel received a staggering $ 134 billion in military support during the same period to enable its survival. Pakistan, which received $ 44.4 billion in economic aid for a population one-sixth of India's, also got with $12.9 billion in military assistance from the US through regular channels, not counting the billions it bilked more recently in the form of coalition support funds

Go and suck Uncle SAM more to get more AID. May be you can use some lubricant this time.
 
.
Yes, Pakistan is biding its time. The public opinion in America is very much for a pullout from Afg. After that...back to the 90's, I guess.
As for this 'aid', take it. Pakistan has always safeguarded its core interests and offering calibrated concessions based on offers. Yes, this time Trump--the ultimate uncouth President--went too far in his language but I think both countries may well continue to do 'business as usual': Pakistan itself does or allows America a strike somewhere, Congress convinced and releases the funds, India's ego massaged by Trump. Business as usual.
Tick Tock, Tick Tock..
Beghairti and Besharmi as usual.
I know it's hard for jarnails to refuse money.
As an Indian said above,and I hate to admit it,but they stuck a out bone infront of a barking dog because they know that the dog wont be able to refuse it.
It is the mastery of the establishment that they have made their greed synonymous to national interest..yani bheek lena hi hamara national interest hai somehow.
 
.
India is not fighting someone's else war. The assistance Pakistan is getting is fighting US war. So Pakistan is acting as mercenaries killing its people and US paying you for that.

Assistance to India is over a period of 65 years for development work not military aid.

Excerpts from the same link you pasted.

The difference between India and U.S client states such as Israel, Pakistan, Egypt, South Korea and others becomes all the more stark when one examines the American military assistance - negligible in the case of India -- to these countries. In addition to the $ 65.1 billion in economic aid, Israel received a staggering $ 134 billion in military support during the same period to enable its survival. Pakistan, which received $ 44.4 billion in economic aid for a population one-sixth of India's, also got with $12.9 billion in military assistance from the US through regular channels, not counting the billions it bilked more recently in the form of coalition support funds

Go and suck Uncle SAM more to get more AID. May be you can use some lubricant this time.
we fight wars that is why we got CSF while bharat auntie being freeloader like always got money for giving uncle SAM blowjobs
 
.
So uncle sam has given money for one more night stand with Pakistan. What are the conditions put for this assistance? This time, Will it be RAW?

India is the world largest Aid recipient and even today if she is not receiving Aid (which by the way, she still is) she still number on in dollar figure wise, so if one was to go by your logic, we have one night stands what are you doing for those dollars!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

WASHINGTON: India has been identified as the largest recipient of U.S economic assistance over a 66-year period in inflation-adjusted dollars although Washington's pet allies, Israel and Pakistan, received far more American dole in per capita terms.

Data compiled by USAID and released recently shows that India received $ 65.1 billion in economic assistance from the US in inflation-adjusted dollars in the period 1946-2012, closely followed by Israel, which received $ 65 billion.

India currently is only around $ 100 million after New Delhi embarked on a course of weaning itself away from aid to trade in the 1990s.

UK

Britain’s statements around severing of aid to middle-income countries including India created the impression that it had stopped all funding to the countries, when in fact the government is still giving millions of pounds.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...t-of-US-economic-aid/articleshow/48093123.cms

Ouch, I bet you didn't see that coming!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
.
if we reject this one , they are just going to come up with another offer, with more money, less checks... that should be rejected too....
 
.
India is the world largest Aid recipient and even today if she is not receiving Aid (which by the way, she still is) she still number on in dollar figure wise, so if one was to go by your logic, we have one night stands what are you doing for those dollars!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

WASHINGTON: India has been identified as the largest recipient of U.S economic assistance over a 66-year period in inflation-adjusted dollars although Washington's pet allies, Israel and Pakistan, received far more American dole in per capita terms.

Data compiled by USAID and released recently shows that India received $ 65.1 billion in economic assistance from the US in inflation-adjusted dollars in the period 1946-2012, closely followed by Israel, which received $ 65 billion.

India currently is only around $ 100 million after New Delhi embarked on a course of weaning itself away from aid to trade in the 1990s.

UK

Britain’s statements around severing of aid to middle-income countries including India created the impression that it had stopped all funding to the countries, when in fact the government is still giving millions of pounds.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...t-of-US-economic-aid/articleshow/48093123.cms

Ouch, I bet you didn't see that coming!!!!!!!!!!!!
It only proves you are slow brainer like many of your netas sitting in your NA. I quoted this piece of report earlier in my earlier post. While you removed the part of the report which clearly highlights that in absolute numbers though India may look like bigger receiver of the AID, but all this is for development where as other countries including Pakistan receive undisclosed amount of money through military assistance as well which is negligible in case of India.Below is the excerpt from the article.

The difference between India and U.S client states such as Israel, Pakistan, Egypt, South Korea and others becomes all the more stark when one examines the American military assistance - negligible in the case of India -- to these countries.


So genius read the article again. If you have comprehension issues, i will point you the option of converting this article from English to Urdu or what ever language you are comfortable one.

So It is not India, but pakistan which is giving pleasures by opening its ... not only for US but also for US's friends like Britain, Australia and Afghanistan forces on whose behalf US pays you. So keep then happy.
 
.
Read what the other Pakistani members here are saying, you troll.

he is less than perfect in satire but almost getting his way...just enjoy

WHy are we doling 225M or even a cent under any condition to Pakistan? They will never stop their duplicity and terrorism is their only effective capability - just look at Hafees Saeed now has a political party ! . We should really send Pakistan a bill charging them for all the time and resources they have wasted for us, not to mention how many soldiers and marines we lost because of Pakistani duplicity.
 
.
Trump is basically a rogue promoter of wrestling ring. Now American elected him to represent US.
This aid is a litmus test for us; PA already rejected aid/assistance in any field from US, now we are awaiting political decision from GOP.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom