U.S. and Pakistan Update

[CENTCOM]

We are certainly experiencing a crucial phase in our partnership at the moment. We must point out that the U.S. and Pakistan have been able to work through several challenging times and continue to place the importance of our shared peace objectives above the rest. We are seeing plenty of speculations regarding the current state of affairs between our nations. It is important to know what is actually being said from our officials instead of believing fabricated stories and lies.

This is what the U.S. State Department spokesman John Kirby said regarding the U.S. and Pakistan relationship couple of weeks ago: “It is an important, vital relationship that we strongly believe in. Is it complicated at times? Absolutely, it is. Do we see eye to eye on every issue with Pakistan? No, we don’t. But that’s why the relationship matters so much, because we have shared threats and shared concerns, shared interest in the region, and we’re going to continue to work at it.”

We would like to inform the readers what the U.S. said regarding the new Taliban leader. According to the transcript of State Department Spokesperson Mark Toner’s press briefing last week: “I think our olive branch would be simply that we have long said that we support an Afghan-led, Afghan-owned peace process and reconciliation process, and we would welcome any efforts by the new Taliban leadership to engage.”

Ali Khan
Digital Engagement Team, USCENTCOM

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

We will let you know once our Parliament decides. Our Prime Minister will provide a certification CIA was not involved in illegal Military action in Pakistan.

US Embassy should start packing their bags in case the certification does not comes in time
Just a heads up, Nawaz Sharif is on vacation so there might be no certification

What can we do if 1 parliament member might object to US Embassy in Pakistan, Certificate can't be issued

We can talk about relations and friendship by long distance phone. We value the relation and there is no reason this can just not take place only by phone, if the matter is urgent please send a normal air mail letter, in 30 days we will respond by air mail letter which will take 30 days to reach continental USA.

If we are missed we will send a post card on Valentine's day

Any attack from Afghan land (Terrorist) will result in heavy response with in bounds of international self defence laws

Pakistan Engagement Team, PAKISTAN

 

[Taimoor Khan]

Yes, killing of a peace partner right bang in the middle of peace negotiation was a master stroke.

Meanwhile in Laskar Gah:

http://www.dawn.com/news/1261714/57-afghan-policemen-die-in-fighting-with-taliban

57 Afghan policemen die in fighting with Taliban

 

[Tameem]

Mullah Mansour is not the hardliner, he is in fact very much in search of peace with Americas but by killing Mansour US actually strengthen and united the hardcore Taliban...nothing else.

US is responsible solely in killing peace in Afghanistan, they just lost the way out of Afghanistan.

 

[Talha Asif]

America

 

[Taimoor Khan]

Mullah Mansour is not the hardliner, he is in fact very much in search of peace with Americas but by killing Mansour US actually strengthen and united the hardcore Taliban...nothing else.

US is responsible solely in killing peace in Afghanistan, they just lost the way out of Afghanistan.

The thing which is gone missing on most analyst is the track record of America.

1. Nek Mohammad killed by American drone right bang in the middle with peace negotiations with Pakistan. Which lead to the birth of TTP
2. Hakeem Ullah Mahsood, killed by American drone right bang in the middle with peace negotiations with Pakistan.
3. Mullah Mansoor, killed by American drone right bang in the middle with peace negotiations with Pakistan, China, Afghansitan and Americans themselves!

This lead to no other conclusion that American and her other strategic allies like India need Afghanistan unstable which will give them excuse to keep their foot print on Afghan soil, so they can play their dirty game against Pakistan from there. They need this now more then ever because of upcoming CPEC, Afghan soil provide them best possible way to sabotage it.

 

[TMA]

Mullah Mansour is not the hardliner, he is in fact very much in search of peace with Americas but by killing Mansour US actually strengthen and united the hardcore Taliban...nothing else.

US is responsible solely in killing peace in Afghanistan, they just lost the way out of Afghanistan.

They want to cause further conflict and therefore destabilization; they were never interested in peace. They have long term (zionist) strategic interests: destabilization of Pakistan, containment of China & containment of Russia.

 

[Thorough Pro]

How fucking stupid are you guys? and how fucking stupid do you take us for?

We are certainly experiencing a crucial phase in our partnership at the moment. We must point out that the U.S. and Pakistan have been able to work through several challenging times and continue to place the importance of our shared peace objectives above the rest. We are seeing plenty of speculations regarding the current state of affairs between our nations. It is important to know what is actually being said from our officials instead of believing fabricated stories and lies.

This is what the U.S. State Department spokesman John Kirby said regarding the U.S. and Pakistan relationship couple of weeks ago: “It is an important, vital relationship that we strongly believe in. Is it complicated at times? Absolutely, it is. Do we see eye to eye on every issue with Pakistan? No, we don’t. But that’s why the relationship matters so much, because we have shared threats and shared concerns, shared interest in the region, and we’re going to continue to work at it.”

We would like to inform the readers what the U.S. said regarding the new Taliban leader. According to the transcript of State Department Spokesperson Mark Toner’s press briefing last week: “I think our olive branch would be simply that we have long said that we support an Afghan-led, Afghan-owned peace process and reconciliation process, and we would welcome any efforts by the new Taliban leadership to engage.”

Ali Khan
Digital Engagement Team, USCENTCOM

 

[Basel]

We are certainly experiencing a crucial phase in our partnership at the moment. We must point out that the U.S. and Pakistan have been able to work through several challenging times and continue to place the importance of our shared peace objectives above the rest. We are seeing plenty of speculations regarding the current state of affairs between our nations. It is important to know what is actually being said from our officials instead of believing fabricated stories and lies.

This is what the U.S. State Department spokesman John Kirby said regarding the U.S. and Pakistan relationship couple of weeks ago: “It is an important, vital relationship that we strongly believe in. Is it complicated at times? Absolutely, it is. Do we see eye to eye on every issue with Pakistan? No, we don’t. But that’s why the relationship matters so much, because we have shared threats and shared concerns, shared interest in the region, and we’re going to continue to work at it.”

We would like to inform the readers what the U.S. said regarding the new Taliban leader. According to the transcript of State Department Spokesperson Mark Toner’s press briefing last week: “I think our olive branch would be simply that we have long said that we support an Afghan-led, Afghan-owned peace process and reconciliation process, and we would welcome any efforts by the new Taliban leadership to engage.”

Ali Khan
Digital Engagement Team, USCENTCOM

There was and is, no partnership between US & Pakistan, US just serve its interests by using its paid people or arm twisting Pakistan, US always lay waste of its failures in region specially in Afghanistan on Pakistan. Now you need India way more then Pakistan because it is large market and it will serve as US watchdog in South Asia against rising China.

Where was US when Pakistan needed it the most? It always put sanctions on Pakistan, never transfer tech, discourage military indigenization, reluctant to sell jets which are not considered ultramodern list can go on and on. The real partnership is between China and Pakistan, Turkey and Pakistan but not between US and Pakistan.

US official have also said against Pakistan why you have forgot that and actions speaks louder then words. Will US sell customize version of F35 to Pakistan? Answer is No, because they are halfheartedly selling F-16 (old tech as per first US military capability). While China is offering JV in 5th gen jet project just like they did in JFT project they have offered J-10 customize version with ToT, that is called partnership. Tell me what front line military tech US have transfered to Pakistan??? What huge Investment and TOT has done in Pakistani economy and industry?

 

[Tameem]

we have long said that we support an Afghan-led, Afghan-owned peace process and reconciliation process, and we would welcome any efforts by the new Taliban leadership to engage.”

I think, that time has gone, US and Afghan (Northern Alliance) had fvcking 16 years to solves it that way....but you both fails it miserably and a war lost on the ground and on the table cannot be win again by showing utter foolishness repeatedly.