What's new

U.N. to issue Sri Lanka war crimes report demanding justice

Mangala confirms international role in domestic mechanism

Although a definitive response was not expressed concerning the OHCHR recommended ‘hybrid special court’ to deal with accountability issues, Foreign Affairs Minister Mangala Samaraweera today confirmed an international role in the domestic inquiry mechanism and added the government plans to conclude the proposed processes within 18 months.

Mangala confirms int'l role in domestic mechanism ::: Dailymirror.lk ::: Breaking News



This Ranil + Sirisena + Chandrika combo is going to destroy Sri Lanka, all they are doing is dancing to the USA's tune.
 
.
UNHCR report didn't materialist because of them. The sole reason in we wining the war.

your self proclaimed patriot jokers didn't implement the LLRC recommendations the UNHRC report was created because of that

But then again you believe MR's propaganda that US and the west madly wants to create an ealam and helped LTTE and tons of other childish lies and believes Wimal is a patriot

So I dont expect you to understand
 
Last edited:
.
your self proclaimed patriot jokers didn't implement the LLRC recommendations the UNHRC report was created because of that

LLRC report outlined some recommendations. There's no hard and fast rule that say implement everything written down on it and to do it quickly. Anyhow UN has no authority to force a sovereign nation to do what UN wants. And it is not a excuse to bring UNHRC report.

But then again you believe MR's propaganda that US and the west madly wants to create an ealam and helped LTTE and tons of other childish lies and believes Wimal is a patriot

So I dont expect you to understand

Oh right West didn't help LTTE. I think East did. If you have something to say come up with fact rather than infamy your opponents.

LOL
A committee made up of professionals has already been appointed to create the new constitution.

So just because they are professionals we can 100% trust them do their duty right.
 
.
‘India has responsibility to stop internal inquiry’ - The Hindu
17th_split-stor_17_2550665f.jpg

Chief Minister Jayalalithaa told the Assembly on Wednesday that the UNHRC would hold its sessions between Sept. 14 and Oct. 2.


Chief Minister Jayalalithaa told the Assembly on Wednesday that the UNHRC would hold its sessions between September 14 and October 2. On September 30, there would be a debate on the Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights-Promoting Reconciliation and Accountability in Sri Lanka. The resolution on the subject will be discussed on October 1 and 2, Ms. Jayalalithaa said.

Meanwhile, media reports suggested that the Sri Lankan government’s views had been sought on the report. In such a situation, there are apprehensions that a resolution favouring “internal inquiry” by the Sri Lankan government could be moved in the UNHRC.

“It is against natural justice. India has a great responsibility to stop it,” Ms. Jayalalithaa said. It was in this context that it was decided to unanimously adopt a resolution in the Assembly urging the Centre to take steps through the UNHRC for an international probe.

Ms. Jayalalithaa also recalled the earlier resolutions moved by her in the Assembly urging India not to treat Sri Lanka as a “friendly nation” and impose “economic sanctions” on the island nation for its war crimes.

Another resolution had demanded that India boycott a meeting of Heads of Commonwealth nations held in Sri Lanka in 2013, besides insisting on the non-participation of Sri Lankan players and officials in IPL matches in Chennai. “The BCCI agreed and is following it till now,” Ms. Jayalalithaa said, hailing it as a victory for her government to the loud thumping of desks by the ruling partymen.

Later, she wrote a letter to the Prime Minister, appending the resolution passed unanimously in the Assembly, and requesting the Centre to take immediate action on the basis of it.



Jayalalithaa recalls earlier resolutions moved by her in the Assembly urging India not to treat Sri Lanka as a “friendly nation”
 
.
Oh right West didn't help LTTE. I think East did. If you have something to say come up with fact rather than infamy your opponents.

LOL nonsensical propaganda without facts. You can't cry and say to bring facts when I bring facts while you keep shouting and denying
Even @Gibbs explained how the US helped us in the war.
US banned the LTTE, arrested LTTE members ,freezed their assets and took down there funding networks etc
If they wanted a Eelam they should have funded the LTTE and they have nothing to gain from it. and those are facts

Bring some facts instead of sprouting what your king washed your brain with, you couldn't bring any fact and keep shouting to bring facts at others.
You desperately tried to whitewash and deny about MR's cult without any facts and after tons of facts and evidence were given to you by us you asked us to give facts:omghaha: and now you are doing the same

Even the double tongued snakes you worship as patriots said the US helped Sri Lanka in the war
WikiLeaks: Sri Lanka Appreciated US Support In The Fight Against LTTE – US State Department | Colombo Telegraph
 
Last edited:
.
What is left? Everything. Sri Lanka is still a unitary state with all of it's land areas under gov. control.

Sigh.. It's like arguing with a 8 year old.. :disagree:.. This is not about territorial integrity.. This is about the integrity of Sri Lanka in global fora.. Which you're god king and his cohorts systematically destroyed since 2010, Except for steadfast allies in China,Pakistan and Russia who's relationship supersedes successive govts since Independence, MR coterie managed to alienate every single other ally from Japan and South Korea to Asean and non aligned nations, What was left was to pose for pics with Gadaffi (Sorry Jamahir) and the tribal king of Swaziland.. Mr. Lakshman Kadirgamar must have turned on his grave

What had happened with Sajin Vaas or any other person is irrelevant to the UNHCR report.

UNHCR report didn't materialist because of them. The sole reason in we wining the war.

Of cause the role of thugs with no qualifications given the authorities to handle foreign affairs have the responsibilities in what happened at the UNHRC and why the country was dragged in to this quagmire

UNHRC resolution was bought by those who lost the war yes.. And by those INGO leeches that couldn't stomach the fact they lost a opportunity to bleed another country for another decade.. But you're blind veneration seem to ignore is.. the first two resolutions were in favor of the country..

No criminal justice was demanded
No international investigation was demanded

Majority of the nations actually supported the resolution in favor of SL destroying the LTTE..

And then came the ego of your tin pot dictator

What happened to Dayan Jayathilleke ? What happened to Tamara Kunanayakam ? What happened ambassador Zuhair ? Those people instrumental in SL winning the resolution.. What happened to Chris Nonis ? Instrumental in getting the Tory government to be impartial ?.. Maybe you dont know these people, Obviously some third class thug politicians are more important to you

Who fucked up this situation ? Go read the article i posted by Gomin Dayasiri, A prominent anti separatist pro nationalist lawyer and commentator, He has no love loss for the UNP or RW but he speaks facts.. He is a real patriot, Not some lemon puff munching card board hero that see's a US conspiracy every time he poo..

Who invited Ban ki Moon right after the war, Made a huge hoo haa and promised a investigation to war crimes when nobody asked for any ? Who shot themselves on the foot when that was'nt forthcoming BKM appointed Darusman and Sooka for a war crime report that the MR regime had no say and to this day the Country is being humiliated with ? Who got Callum McCrae of Ch 4 fame and other NGO bastards in to the country during the Commonwealth summit ? When the country really did'nt need to, But just to built on the ego ?

Like i said i feel sorry for the frogs in the well..Croaking day and night, Jumping around in thier own waste.. Without knowing what the real world look's like, How it works Or how insignificant they are

1) Do you believe that UNHRC resolution against SL could've been averted if we didn't fight the war?

A stupid question, So i wont bother

2) What is your opinion on the people who once were anti-war and pro-cease fire agreement lobbyist, now representing the UNHRC report.

Again does'nt make sense.. Be more specific

3) What is your opinion on the 4th eelam war as a whole.

Had to be done, Whatever the consequences for the good of all the people.. No qualms about it.. And president Mahinda Rajapaksa or atleast his former self pre 2010, Will be considered one of the greatest leaders in Lankan history to defeat terrorism and bring peace and stability to the country.. That should never be forgotten

4) According to you what is the "Tamil Problem" and what is the solution to fix it.

In my personal opinion.. There is no such thing as a Tamil problem.. What is there though is the lack of willingness to implement a Sri Lankan identity over separate ethnic identity.. The use of this Tamil problem is done by the Tamil polity preserve their supremacy in Tamil society.. Ordinary Tamil people in the country has the same day to day issues as the rest of the population.. They have the same rights and are equal under the constitution of the country

Whether they face difficulties in actually enjoying those rights is another issue that needs to be addressed.. As far as i believe.. No ethnicity or religion deserves special rights or considerations.. Every single Sri Lankan should be equal under the law.. Which they are
 
Last edited:
.
Sigh.. It's like arguing with a 8 year old.. :disagree:.. This is not about territorial integrity.. This is about the integrity of Sri Lanka in global fora.. Which you're god king and his cohorts systematically destroyed since 2010, Except for steadfast allies in China,Pakistan and Russia who's relationship supersedes successive govts since Independence, MR coterie managed to alienate every single other ally from Japan and South Korea to Asean and non aligned nations, What was left was to pose for pics with Gadaffi (Sorry Jamahir) and the tribal king of Swaziland.. Mr. Lakshman Kadirgamar must have turned on his grave

I do not actually know what you meant by "integrity of Sri Lanka in global fora." because there's no such thing as integrity of a country among many other foreign ones. However AFAIK MR gov. tried their best to keep the integrity of SL response to UNHCR resolutions until 2015. I dunno whether the present gov. would keep up the pace.

Actually what we have to remember here is that how unfair the playing field is to SL in UN gen. assembly. Obviously we cannot compete with the prowess of the US in many field. It's actually something to commend about how well we did in UN gen. assembly even when US tried their best with money, power and threat to align UNHCR voters towards there cause.

Of cause the role of thugs with no qualifications given the authorities to handle foreign affairs have the responsibilities in what happened at the UNHRC and why the country was dragged in to this quagmire

I think you should back up your claim here. I see no reason for that. As I said earlier we are in this quagmire because we ended the bloody war.

UNHRC resolution was bought by those who lost the war yes.. And by those INGO leeches that couldn't stomach the fact they lost a opportunity to bleed another country for another decade.. But you're blind veneration seem to ignore is.. the first two resolutions were in favor of the country..

No criminal justice was demanded
No international investigation was demanded

Majority of the nations actually supported the resolution in favor of SL destroying the LTTE..

Yes. Indeed. They just played with time during 2011-2012. We had a upper hand then because it was too soon for SL to respond to any war related issue. But the last couple years it seems that the time had run out on our part.

Bear in mind that no self respecting country would do what UN is recommending.

What happened to Dayan Jayathilleke ? What happened to Tamara Kunanayakam ? What happened ambassador Zuhair ? Those people instrumental in SL winning the resolution.. What happened to Chris Nonis ? Instrumental in getting the Tory government to be impartial ?.. Maybe you dont know these people, Obviously some third class thug politicians are more important to you

Oh.. leave Chris Nonis out of this. The incident related with him has nothing to do with UNHCR resolutions. It's just a side story. Don't drag it in here.

AFAIK the first two years was advantageous to us in terms on time and we played that advantage. But we made some critical mistakes like putting up LLRC commission etc.,. Anyways AFAIK what ever SL do won't stop US and it's allies from framing SL and bringing those who lead the war to a international criminal court. It will act as a revenge and a lesson to potential politicians.

A stupid question, So i wont bother

Ok. I'll ask like this. Why do you think UN took up this cause of bringing justice to SL.?

Again does'nt make sense.. Be more specific

Why people like Sunanda Deshapriya, Victor Ivan, Nimalak etc., are behind the movement to allow international investigation on war crimes?

Had to be done, Whatever the consequences for the good of all the people.. No qualms about it.. And president Mahinda Rajapaksa or atleast his former self pre 2010, Will be considered one of the greatest leaders in Lankan history to defeat terrorism and bring peace and stability to the country.. That should never be forgotten

So do you trust UNP who mocked and ridicule the war effort from beginning to end, to uphold the national security and the integrity of the country in the face on UNHCR resolutions?

In my personal opinion.. There is no such thing as a Tamil problem.. What is there though is the lack of willingness to implement a Sri Lankan identity over separate ethnic identity.. The use of this Tamil problem is done by the Tamil polity preserve their supremacy in Tamil society.. Ordinary Tamil people in the country has the same day to day issues as the rest of the population.. They have the same rights and are equal under the constitution of the country

Whether they face difficulties in actually enjoying those rights is another issue that needs to be addressed.. As far as i believe.. No ethnicity or religion deserves special rights or considerations.. Every single Sri Lankan should be equal under the law.. Which they are

So then how do SL gov. should deal with so called "Tamil polity"?
 
.
I do not actually know what you meant by "integrity of Sri Lanka in global fora." because there's no such thing as integrity of a country among many other foreign ones. However AFAIK MR gov. tried their best to keep the integrity of SL response to UNHCR resolutions until 2015. I dunno whether the present gov. would keep up the pace.

Man........ even a 8 year old these days won't be fooled by this.
All the lies the Pseudo-patriots said in Sri Lanak to fool the masses and politicizing the UNHRC and use it as a tool to create exaggerated threats to justify MR's reign and to keep MR in power alone is enough to prove that MR didn't give a damn about integrity but his own goals

This is another one of your baseless lies alongside saying that there is no MR worshiping cult and US madly wants to create a eelam and helped the LTTE(That one is humorous)
 
Last edited:
.
This is another one of your baseless lies alongside saying that there is no MR worshiping cult and US madly wants to create a eelam and helped the LTTE(That one is humorous)

So why is US hell bent to give Tamils justice? Do they have some soft spot?
 
.
So why is US hell bent to give Tamils justice? Do they have some soft spot?

LOL after saying that US wants to create eelam and funded the LTTE is that all you can say?
 
.
I do not actually know what you meant by "integrity of Sri Lanka in global fora." because there's no such thing as integrity of a country among many other foreign ones. However AFAIK MR gov. tried their best to keep the integrity of SL response to UNHCR resolutions until 2015. I dunno whether the present gov. would keep up the pace.

Actually what we have to remember here is that how unfair the playing field is to SL in UN gen. assembly. Obviously we cannot compete with the prowess of the US in many field. It's actually something to commend about how well we did in UN gen. assembly even when US tried their best with money, power and threat to align UNHCR voters towards there cause.



I think you should back up your claim here. I see no reason for that. As I said earlier we are in this quagmire because we ended the bloody war.



Yes. Indeed. They just played with time during 2011-2012. We had a upper hand then because it was too soon for SL to respond to any war related issue. But the last couple years it seems that the time had run out on our part.

Bear in mind that no self respecting country would do what UN is recommending.



Oh.. leave Chris Nonis out of this. The incident related with him has nothing to do with UNHCR resolutions. It's just a side story. Don't drag it in here.

AFAIK the first two years was advantageous to us in terms on time and we played that advantage. But we made some critical mistakes like putting up LLRC commission etc.,. Anyways AFAIK what ever SL do won't stop US and it's allies from framing SL and bringing those who lead the war to a international criminal court. It will act as a revenge and a lesson to potential politicians.



Ok. I'll ask like this. Why do you think UN took up this cause of bringing justice to SL.?



Why people like Sunanda Deshapriya, Victor Ivan, Nimalak etc., are behind the movement to allow international investigation on war crimes?



So do you trust UNP who mocked and ridicule the war effort from beginning to end, to uphold the national security and the integrity of the country in the face on UNHCR resolutions?



So then how do SL gov. should deal with so called "Tamil polity"?

After you're brain dead repeated post on total mental denial of the responsibility of your god king and his regime for the external intervention through the UNHRC, You expect me to reply to you ? Even after paragraph after paragraph detailing the failures that led to this situation.. After articles even from well renowned nationalist commentators highlighting them..The best you could come up with is " However AFAIK MR gov. tried their best to keep the integrity of SL response to UNHCR resolutions until 2015. I dunno whether the present gov. would keep up the pace." ???

You're sadly mistaken if you think i'll be obliged.. Please do not waste my time.. Stick to venerating your beloved politicians and let the rest of us discuss about the nation and it's issues.. Cheers
 
Last edited:
. .
Well I just need your opinion.

I have already given my opinion and the entire issue ,I have given facts and even statements from the MR regime thanking the US for all the help MR govt even specially thanked the US for sensors and radars.

You said the US helped the LTTE during the without any facts and even when all the facts contradict your fantasy, and you keep repeating the same thing like a Brain dead zombie of MR.
 
. .
@Gibbs Check this out,
Mahinda was the first politician is Sri lankan history to ask the UN to launch a Human rights investigation on Sri Lanka and he was the one who allowed the UN to investigate the war crime allegations



Ghosts From Rajapaksa Regime Gets A Beating In Geneva
Over a month after the general election, the national government that has been formed is yet to commence its official functions due to the inability of its ministers to carry out their official duties. The delay in gazetting the subject matters under each ministerial portfolio has posed a problem for many ministers to carry out their work.
However, Finance Minister Ravi Karunanayake has commenced work in his office and has commenced the preparation work for the 2016 budget presentation scheduled for this November.

Many ministers are now engaged in discussions in various corners of the political arena canvassing for ‘good’ subjects to be assigned under the portfolios. A newly appointed minister, Daya Gamage, was in fact requested by Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe to be innovative and work towards creating his own subjects.


Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe at a media briefing along with President Maithripala Sirisena and ministers Mangala Samaraweera, Gayantha Karunathilaka and Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe, Mahinda Rajapaksa, Anura Kumara Dissanayake and Zeid Ra’ad Zeid Al Hussein

Citing several examples from the past Wickremesinghe had explained that the creation of several much sought after institutions were subjects that were created by former ministers who looked at expanding their work scope. All these discussions have delayed the printing of the gazette outlining the subjects under each ministry.

Amidst discussions on assigning subjects to portfolios, a secret discussion took place recently between President Sirisena and Prime Minister Wickremesinghe.

The discussion was to raise objections to several deputy ministerial appointments made by the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP).

Wickremesinghe, it is learnt, had explained to Sirisena the bad consequences the national government might have to face if appointments are made without a proper consensus and granted to individuals who are facing various allegations.

The Sunday Leader learns that the objections were mainly directed at the appointments granted to Galle District United People’s Freedom Alliance (UPFA) MP Nishantha Muthuhettigama and Gampaha District UPFA MP Nimal Lansa.

It is also learnt that objections to the deputy ministerial portfolios granted to Muthuhettigama and Lansa had even been raised within the ranks of the SLFP.

President Sirisena was also informed that the Deputy Justice Minister appointed by him, Dushmantha Mithrapala, was also under a warrant issued by court.

The President was unaware of the case pending before court against Mithrapala for allegedly threatening and intimidating police officers last month.

However, the President and Prime Minister have agreed on the need for better consultations before making future appointments.



MR’s approach

Meanwhile, former President Mahinda Rajapaksa is now playing a silent role by posing a stance of working amicably with the government.

Rajapaksa has shown a slight distance from the extremist elements in the UPFA like Wimal Weerawansa, Udaya Gammanpila and Vasudeva Nanayakkara.

The Rajapaksa camp is also looking at overcoming some of the allegations faced by members of his family by gradually aligning with the government.

One of the main tools the Rajapaksa family is trying to use in this endeavor is the controversial Carlton Sports Network (CSN) that was affiliated to the former First Family. Despite a court order preventing the sale or transfer of assets vested with the CSN, attempts are being made by the Rajapaksa family to hand over the management to members of the government. The main aim of this act is to get members of the Rajapaksa family cleared of money laundering charges connected with the establishment of the electronic media network.

CID sources have told The Sunday Leader that two politicians are attempting to purchase CSN, but the court order has prevented the sale from taking place pending ongoing investigations.

The Kaduwela Magistrate’s court had recently issued an interim order banning the sale, lease or temporary transfer of the CSN sports TV channel as well as three radio channels operated by the company.

The order was issued in accordance to a FCID submission under B/9823.

The FCID, investigating as to how funding was received to start the channel, had been permitted by courts to summon its directors for questioning under the Money Laundering Act.

The legacy of the former Rajapaksa regime that includes corruption, fraud and crime continues to be an issue the new government is yet trying to resolve.



The Geneva drama

As for the legacy of the former Rajapaksa regime, one that has posed an issue at international level to Sri Lanka is the issue of alleged human rights violations committed during the war.

The Sirisena-Wickremesinghe government last week had to witness the ghosts of the former Rajapaksa regime in the form of the report on Sri Lanka released by the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC).

“Our investigation has laid bare the horrific level of violations and abuses that occurred in Sri Lanka, including indiscriminate shelling, extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances, harrowing accounts of torture and sexual violence, recruitment of children and other grave crimes,” High Commissioner Zeid Ra’ad Zeid Al Husseinsaid after releasing the report. “Importantly, the report reveals violations that are among the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole.”

“This report is being presented in a new political context in Sri Lanka, which offers grounds for hope,” Zeid said. “It is crucial that this historic opportunity for truly fundamental change is not allowed to slip.”

The UNHRC has proposed, among others, the setting up of a hybrid court to take up issues of alleged violations and abuses that had taken place in Sri Lanka and the opening of an UNHRC office in Sri Lanka to ensure the implementation of the recommendations.

Nevertheless, the new government last week acted with maturity before the UNHRC making the international community wanting to cooperate with the country.

The recommendations of the UNHRC resulted in several extremist elements waxing eloquent about the threat faced by the country.

Interestingly, most of these extremist elements, who were affiliated to the former Rajapaksa regime, have conveniently forgotten that it was former President Rajapaksa who had in 2009 agreed to a joint mechanism with the UN to inquire into any allegations during the period of the war. In fact, Rajapaksa has a long history with the UNHRC as the first Sri Lankan politician to make representations to the Commission (during the early 1990s) demanding an international inquiry into alleged human rights violations taking place in the country at the time.

Be that as it may, the Sirisena-Wickremesinghe government, through its efforts in the past eight months, had managed to tone down to a great extent the UNHRC report by preventing names of individuals from being published in it.

“Before January 8, the report was prepared in a manner that would have caused much problems to the country. There were indications that names were going to be used in the report. However, the new government worked giving prominence to human rights and all these resulted in the toning down of the UNHRC report,” President Sirisena told media heads on Friday. He added that the visits of foreign dignitaries to the country including that of US Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asia, Nisha Biswal, had helped reduce the impact of the UNHRC report.

It was Mahinda Rajapaksa and his government who agreed to a joint mechanism in the first place.

The best government to solve the issue of human rights violations is one without Mahinda Rajapaksa. Otherwise the issue before the UNHRC this time would have been a harsh and complex one,” Sirisena pointed out.

Prime Minister Wickremesinghe noted that the country achieved a victory since there will not be an international inquiry and individuals have also not been named. “We have also not agreed to a hybrid court recommendation made by the UNHRC,” the Premier added.

He explained that the discussion on the 24th at the UNHRC would focus on further discussing the recommendations.

“The final decision by the government will be made after studying the Paranagama and Udalagama reports,” Wickremesinghe said. He also reminded that certain political elements were trying to gain petty mileage through using the recommendation to set up a hybrid court forgetting the fact that when former Prime Minister S. W. R. D. Bandaranaike was assassinated, the committee probing the incident had included two foreign judges and one Sri Lankan judge.

The government is also looking to have more robust engagement with the US, including through a ‘Partnership Dialogue’ between the two countries that envisages to encompass all issues of mutual concern and benefit, Sri Lanka’s Ambassador to the US, Prasad Kariyawasam said. Ambassador Kariyawasam said this when he was hosted by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a premier Washington-based think tank, to speak on prospects for US-Sri Lanka relations following the elections in Sri Lanka, the Foreign Ministry said.

To a full room of attendees comprising former and current US government representatives, think tanks, journalists and Sri Lanka-enthusiasts, the Ambassador detailed the transformation that has been taking place in Sri Lanka, since the presidential elections in January, and the reaffirmation of the new government’s policies in August through the parliamentary election and as to how these path breaking developments positively impact relations between Sri Lanka and the United States.



SLFP appoints committee

Political parties in Colombo are currently engaged in a process of preparing its stance on the UNHRC report.

The SLFP central committee that met last Friday evening at the President’s official residence, decided that the party needed to adopt an official stance on the UNHRC report released last week in Geneva and the ongoing process. The central committee decided to appoint a committee of intellectuals to study the report and make recommendations to the party on the stance to be adopted by the SLFP. SLFP General Secretary Minister Duminda Dissanayake said the committee would be formed this week and the relevant report will be submitted within a span of two weeks.

Meanwhile, the central committee also discussed the forthcoming local government elections as well.

The issue of nominations at the elections was the key topic focused during the discussion.

Finally it was decided that all party members currently serving in local government bodies, who are not facing any corrupt or criminal charges, will be granted nominations to contest at the next local government bodies.

Also, the President proposed that prominence be given to youth and women who apply for nominations to contest from the party.

As for the party reforms, the committee headed by the SLFP general secretary informed the central committee that the matter was being attended to in consultation with SLFP Patron, former President Chandrika Bandaranike Kumaratunge.



JVP’s proposals

The Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) last week presented a set of 20 proposals formulated together with civil society groups, artistes and political groups.

Presenting the proposals last week, the party stated, “Nine months have passed since a new administration on policies of ‘good governance’ was established to replace Mahinda Rajapaksa’s rotten political culture that had affected the socio-political system of this country for nearly a decade.

The aspirations of the masses in voting in a new mandate on 8th January did go beyond mere defeat of Rajapaksa as an individual. It was to get rid of the political culture nurtured during that period and to establish political, legal and administrative reforms that would prevent a repetition of such a situation.

Also, a number of reforms demanded and had been agitating by political and civil organizations for a long period had been included in the manifesto for the presidential election held on 8th January. These reforms were also included in the manifesto of the government presented for the general election held on August 17. We, as responsible members of political parties and civil organizations as well as individuals, have included several such reforms approved by people in two elections held within 8 months and several other reforms as it is our responsibility to get inspirations of the masses and their needs fulfilled. Also, it is the responsibility of an administration that respects the mandate it has been given to implement such reforms.”

The proposals included the appointing of a parliamentary select committee to prepare a programme to enable Sri Lankan citizens living abroad to vote from where they are domiciled and establishing the ‘Truth and Reconciliation Commission’ to enable those who were affected by the war to present their grievances, to find out the truth regarding such complaints and to give relief to the distress.

It also included bringing in constitutional amendments to totally abolish the executive presidential system, enforce laws to revoke parliamentary seats of parliamentarians who cross over and abolish provisions that exists in the 19th Amendment to bring the number of ministers to 30 and the number of deputy ministers to 40 and legalise the subjects and institutions of ministries on a scientific basis by bringing in a Parliamentary Act.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom