You cannot understand the circumstances MR and RW is making these statements. Can you?
MR’s promise of a new constitution was rather a reactive election promise to what RW made. It has no substance while RW has been for changing the constitution from day 1.
What is american’s pain about our constitution? Why do they make statements asking to change it and RW doing exactly what Americans want? And Mangala updating the them about constitutional change? They have no part in that.
LOL You pretty much say that US wants this and US wants that.
But from Mangala statement it is very clear that he only mentioned the new constitution is only a minor thing in his statement and is ensured to make sure that tamils are not marginalized in Sri Lankan politics
It is only few like you and especially the ones who live in utopia dreaming a perfect democracy who calls to replace the constitution. There is no demand in public to change the constitution. It is a manufactured demand. Let’s agree for the sake of argument that constitution needs to be changed.
And it is not a mess like you think.
It is very forward looking one that did solve many issues the country faced.
I don't dream of a"Utopia" I dream of a efficient country without conflict and free of Racial and religious issues, with a rule of law
And this system made many problems worse ,it should have been changed after the war ended
You know there is an American saying ‘Don’t fix it if it ain’t broken’. That is same for our constitution.
The point here is what has Americans got to do about our constitution which should be solely decided by the people of this country!
LOL Its the people of the country that decide it and shouting it will not change it.
Mangala mentioned about the constitutional reforms as one of the many steps that are being taken to stop of Racial conflict and you start shouting about america
If you cannot understand what he said then I cannot make you understand. There is no reason to talk about the constitution on a topic about war crimes. Americans are trying to get it changed by showing the report.
Tell me why RW is not questioning the report on very valid grounds? Why accept it without verification?
Just saying that "Americans are trying to get it changed by showing the report." repeatedly does not make it true.
Actually I understand what you say and you are saying that US wants to change our constitution by showing us the report.
On a session about war crimes when a report is introduced it IS about war crimes. To say to prevent from happening again we have to see what really happened and if war crimes are there it is a totally military thing and completely different from constitution.
It is not about war crimes, its larger than that.
The racial conflict didn't start because of the war but because Nationalism ,hate and marginalization of Tamils which resulted in Tamil nationalism becoming stronger.
The military conflict came later.
The UNHRC report is a investgation about Human rights abuses in Sri Lanka and saying how to deal with it and how to make sure that a Racial conflict will not happen again
He explains everything that the government is taking to stop that from repeating and you call it a "Military thing"
He clearly says everything and I read it and even quoted him here but you still repeat the same thing all over again.
You had nothing to say regarding US ambassoder.
Still searching for him
@Godman,
So UN is calling it a crime report and SLG is saying it is not...who is correct and who is wrong.. why is not SLG putting up a defence and verifying it?
I think this proves that you are talking without knowing what you are even talking.
UN is not calling a crime report and neither does GoSL, its only a report on investigations on Human right abuses in the war not a Criminal Investigation