What's new

Turkish cold launch trials: First in NATO ?

-------

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Apr 23, 2009
Messages
5,801
Reaction score
58
Country
Turkey
Location
United Kingdom
A vertical launch system can be either hot launch, where the missile ignites in the cell, or cold launch, where the missile is expelled by gas produced by a gas generator which is not part of the missile itself, and then the missile ignites. "Cold" means relatively cold compared with rocket engine exhaust. A hot launch system does not require an ejection mechanism, but does require some way of disposing of the missile's exhaust and heat as it leaves the cell. If the missile ignites in a cell without an ejection mechanism, the cell must withstand the tremendous heat generated without igniting the missiles in the adjacent cells.

An advantage of a hot-launch system is that the missile propels itself out of the launching cell using its own engine, which eliminates the need for a separate system to eject the missile from the launching tube. This potentially makes a hot-launch system relatively light, small, and economical to develop and produce, particularly when designed around smaller missiles. A potential disadvantage is that a malfunctioning missile could destroy the launch tube.

The advantage of the cold-launch system is in its safety: should a missile engine malfunction during launch, the cold-launch system can eject the missile thereby reducing or eliminating the threat. For this reason, Russian VLSs are often designed with a slant so that a malfunctioning missile will land in the water instead of on the ship's deck. As missile size grows, the benefits of ejection launching increase. Above a certain size, a missile booster cannot be safely ignited within the confines of a ship's hull. Most modern ICBMs and SLBMs are cold-launched.
 
. .
@cabatli_53 can we keep it one place?... otherwise, lot of useful information may be scattered into different threads on the same subject.

Regards,
 
. . .
another advantage of cold lunch compare to hot lunch is it is not damaging the ship... hot lunch system brings up a lot of cost to repair the ship
 
. .
I also love a hot lunch. :D
it looks nice, but when you try to put long distance air defense missile in it, it brings huge cost to repair the shop and shorten the lifestyle of the ship. the damage is so high that pushed Russia to develop cold lunch
 
.
it looks nice, but when you try to put long distance air defense missile in it, it brings huge cost to repair the shop and shorten the lifestyle of the ship. the damage is so high that pushed Russia to develop cold lunch

Mate he means "lunch", you know, meal one.
 
. .
The question is, which system is this being developed for?
 
.
so again from the same infographic can we infer that Siper's missile is NOT a vertically launched missile. in this sense (I mean in launching methods only but nothing else) on the one hand Siper is more like patriot in which the launcers have to be positioned to a certain direction from where the enemy threat is expected and with its angled launchers which provides some empthy space at the back of the launchers for exhaust gases to escape for its hot launched missiles but on the other hand Hisar-U with its vertically launched missiles is more like S-300 or S-400 with a 360 degre missile engagement zone. I am just curious are we working on the cold launch for Hisar U?

I bet Hisar U? :devil: or who knows!
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom