What's new

Turkey not the only country facing Russian violation of airspace

-SINAN-

BANNED
Joined
Feb 22, 2013
Messages
16,746
Reaction score
0
Country
Turkey
Location
Turkey
Russia's recent violation of Turkish airspace is by no means an unprecedented incident, as the country has been accused of such behavior by other countries earlier this year as well.

On Oct. 29, Reuters reported a story about a U.S. Navy aircraft carrier scrambling four F-18 jets two days earlier in the Korean peninsula after two Russian anti-submarine aircraft flew within a nautical mile of the warship, Reagan.

The incident reportedly occurred in international waters east of the peninsula.

On June 30, The Associated Press ran a story about Russian fighter pilots "flying dangerously close to Swedish Air Force jets and in some cases even releasing flares at them," citing Supreme Commander of the Swedish Armed Forces, General Sverker Goransson.

Sweden's top military officer reportedly said that Russians were breaking the normal rules of conduct for military aircraft in the air, including breaking formation, flying at unsafe distances and using "countermeasures" that "nearly bounce off the metal" of the Swedish aircraft; referring to decoy flares designed to divert incoming missiles.

On May 21, Swedish fighter jets allegedly detected two Russian bombers in its international airspace over Sweden's Oland Island in the Baltic Sea, military sources said.

"The two TU-22 bombers were intercepted by two Swedish Jas Gripen jets at noon on Thursday," Goranson told the Swedish national radio broadcaster, EKOT.

The Russian bombers, which are capable of carrying nuclear warheads, resumed their normal routes after the interception, he added.

Nordic nations had agreed in April to boost their defense ties, increase solidarity with Baltic states, and conduct joint military exercises amid deteriorating relations with Russia, calling it "the biggest challenge to European Security".

Defense ministers of Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Iceland and Finland said in a joint declaration on April 9 that their countries must be prepared for emergencies that might arise.

The ministers said in the declaration published in the Norwegian daily Aftenposten: "(Russia) has shown that it is ready to use military means to achieve their political goals, even when it involves violations of international law."

"There is increasing military and intelligence activity in the Baltics and in our northern areas," the ministers said.

"The Russian military is challenging us along our borders and there have been several border infringements in the Baltics," they added.

The heightened tensions also led to the traditionally neutral Scandinavian countries to upgrade their defense capabilities. Finland and Sweden are not NATO-member countries, but they have increased their cooperation with the Alliance in response to what they call "Russian aggression".

Sweden had accused Russia in October last year of having a submarine in Swedish territorial waters. Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Igor Konashenkov later accused the Swedish government of hyping-up tensions in the Baltic Sea region.

Sweden and Denmark also summoned their respective Russian ambassadors in December 2014 in response to a Russian military plane reportedly turning off its location device and nearly colliding with a Swedish civilian airliner.

Russia was accused of violating Finnish airspace with its aircraft three times in a week in late August 2014 and twice in May the same year.

A Russian Tu-95 bomber was intercepted off the coast of Japan on two separate occasions on March 20, according to the Japanese Ministry of Defense, the International Business Times reported three days later.

Reuters had run a story on Jan. 20, saying in the three quarters to Dec. 31, Japanese jets scrambled 369 times to meet Russian planes, four times the pace of a decade ago, citing Japan's Defense Ministry.

Only a day after the Japanese incident, six Russian warplanes were intercepted near Latvia's territorial waters on March 21.

And in the week prior, Spanish and Italian NATO jets intercepted Russian planes in international airspace near Latvia, while Russian submarines were seen in the country's exclusive economic zone, just 27 miles (43.45 kilometers) from the start of Latvia's territorial waters and 39 miles (62.76 kilometers) from its coastline, IB Times reported.

In January, Typhoon jets were dispatched from RAF Lossiemouth in Scotland and RAF Coningsby in Lincolnshire to intercept two Russian bombers capable of carrying nuclear missiles as they flew south of Bournemouth, according to Daily Mail.

On Feb. 17, HMS Argyll reportedly intercepted a Neustrashimy-class warship and its accompanying tanker as they headed home after a deployment in the Mediterranean in the English Channel.

Two days later, two RAF Typhoon jets scrambled from RAF Coningsby in Lincolnshire to escort two Russian bombers in international airspace off the coast of Cornwall.

On Tuesday, two Turkish F-16 fighter jets on an aerial patrol intercepted a Russian warplane within engagement rules when it intruded into Turkish airspace on the Turkey-Syria border.

The intruding aircraft was warned about the violation 10 times within five minutes before it was shot down.

Russian Defense Ministry confirmed that its Russian SU-24 fighter jet had been shot down, which crashed in the Syrian region of Bayirbucak close to Yayladagi district of southern Hatay province.

NATO confirmed the accuracy of the radar trace data that Turkey shared which clearly showed that the Russian warplane violated Turkish airspace.

This was not the first time Russian fighter jets had violated Turkish airspace. In early October, Russian warplanes had breached Turkish airspace for which Russian officials apologized and pledged that no such incident would be repeated; Turkey had also renewed its warning to implement engagement rules, including military response against violations of Turkish airspace.
 
.
True.The rest of the countries should now down Russian jets,make something like a competition of it.At the end the year there could be symbolic prizes for the country who downed the most Russian jets.Sportsmanship entertains the masses.


UPDATE:ISIS who downs Russian civilian airliners is automatically disqualified.Sry folks.
 
.
Turkey is totally wrong. This proves that they are one of the main reasons why this region is in mess. Even if the airplane accidentally came into their territory there was no reason to fire. I am with Russia.
 
.
.
Russia's recent violation of Turkish airspace is by no means an unprecedented incident, as the country has been accused of such behavior by other countries earlier this year as well.

On Oct. 29, Reuters reported a story about a U.S. Navy aircraft carrier scrambling four F-18 jets two days earlier in the Korean peninsula after two Russian anti-submarine aircraft flew within a nautical mile of the warship, Reagan.

The incident reportedly occurred in international waters east of the peninsula.

On June 30, The Associated Press ran a story about Russian fighter pilots "flying dangerously close to Swedish Air Force jets and in some cases even releasing flares at them," citing Supreme Commander of the Swedish Armed Forces, General Sverker Goransson.

Sweden's top military officer reportedly said that Russians were breaking the normal rules of conduct for military aircraft in the air, including breaking formation, flying at unsafe distances and using "countermeasures" that "nearly bounce off the metal" of the Swedish aircraft; referring to decoy flares designed to divert incoming missiles.

On May 21, Swedish fighter jets allegedly detected two Russian bombers in its international airspace over Sweden's Oland Island in the Baltic Sea, military sources said.

"The two TU-22 bombers were intercepted by two Swedish Jas Gripen jets at noon on Thursday," Goranson told the Swedish national radio broadcaster, EKOT.

The Russian bombers, which are capable of carrying nuclear warheads, resumed their normal routes after the interception, he added.

Nordic nations had agreed in April to boost their defense ties, increase solidarity with Baltic states, and conduct joint military exercises amid deteriorating relations with Russia, calling it "the biggest challenge to European Security".

Defense ministers of Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Iceland and Finland said in a joint declaration on April 9 that their countries must be prepared for emergencies that might arise.

The ministers said in the declaration published in the Norwegian daily Aftenposten: "(Russia) has shown that it is ready to use military means to achieve their political goals, even when it involves violations of international law."

"There is increasing military and intelligence activity in the Baltics and in our northern areas," the ministers said.

"The Russian military is challenging us along our borders and there have been several border infringements in the Baltics," they added.

The heightened tensions also led to the traditionally neutral Scandinavian countries to upgrade their defense capabilities. Finland and Sweden are not NATO-member countries, but they have increased their cooperation with the Alliance in response to what they call "Russian aggression".

Sweden had accused Russia in October last year of having a submarine in Swedish territorial waters. Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Igor Konashenkov later accused the Swedish government of hyping-up tensions in the Baltic Sea region.

Sweden and Denmark also summoned their respective Russian ambassadors in December 2014 in response to a Russian military plane reportedly turning off its location device and nearly colliding with a Swedish civilian airliner.

Russia was accused of violating Finnish airspace with its aircraft three times in a week in late August 2014 and twice in May the same year.

A Russian Tu-95 bomber was intercepted off the coast of Japan on two separate occasions on March 20, according to the Japanese Ministry of Defense, the International Business Times reported three days later.

Reuters had run a story on Jan. 20, saying in the three quarters to Dec. 31, Japanese jets scrambled 369 times to meet Russian planes, four times the pace of a decade ago, citing Japan's Defense Ministry.

Only a day after the Japanese incident, six Russian warplanes were intercepted near Latvia's territorial waters on March 21.

And in the week prior, Spanish and Italian NATO jets intercepted Russian planes in international airspace near Latvia, while Russian submarines were seen in the country's exclusive economic zone, just 27 miles (43.45 kilometers) from the start of Latvia's territorial waters and 39 miles (62.76 kilometers) from its coastline, IB Times reported.

In January, Typhoon jets were dispatched from RAF Lossiemouth in Scotland and RAF Coningsby in Lincolnshire to intercept two Russian bombers capable of carrying nuclear missiles as they flew south of Bournemouth, according to Daily Mail.

On Feb. 17, HMS Argyll reportedly intercepted a Neustrashimy-class warship and its accompanying tanker as they headed home after a deployment in the Mediterranean in the English Channel.

Two days later, two RAF Typhoon jets scrambled from RAF Coningsby in Lincolnshire to escort two Russian bombers in international airspace off the coast of Cornwall.

On Tuesday, two Turkish F-16 fighter jets on an aerial patrol intercepted a Russian warplane within engagement rules when it intruded into Turkish airspace on the Turkey-Syria border.

The intruding aircraft was warned about the violation 10 times within five minutes before it was shot down.

Russian Defense Ministry confirmed that its Russian SU-24 fighter jet had been shot down, which crashed in the Syrian region of Bayirbucak close to Yayladagi district of southern Hatay province.

NATO confirmed the accuracy of the radar trace data that Turkey shared which clearly showed that the Russian warplane violated Turkish airspace.

This was not the first time Russian fighter jets had violated Turkish airspace. In early October, Russian warplanes had breached Turkish airspace for which Russian officials apologized and pledged that no such incident would be repeated; Turkey had also renewed its warning to implement engagement rules, including military response against violations of Turkish airspace.

Don't worry brother, we've shot down 7 Russian jets before - they cant and wont do shit.
 
. .
Russia's recent violation of Turkish airspace is by no means an unprecedented incident, as the country has been accused of such behavior by other countries earlier this year as well.

On Oct. 29, Reuters reported a story about a U.S. Navy aircraft carrier scrambling four F-18 jets two days earlier in the Korean peninsula after two Russian anti-submarine aircraft flew within a nautical mile of the warship, Reagan.

The incident reportedly occurred in international waters east of the peninsula.

On June 30, The Associated Press ran a story about Russian fighter pilots "flying dangerously close to Swedish Air Force jets and in some cases even releasing flares at them," citing Supreme Commander of the Swedish Armed Forces, General Sverker Goransson.

Sweden's top military officer reportedly said that Russians were breaking the normal rules of conduct for military aircraft in the air, including breaking formation, flying at unsafe distances and using "countermeasures" that "nearly bounce off the metal" of the Swedish aircraft; referring to decoy flares designed to divert incoming missiles.

On May 21, Swedish fighter jets allegedly detected two Russian bombers in its international airspace over Sweden's Oland Island in the Baltic Sea, military sources said.

"The two TU-22 bombers were intercepted by two Swedish Jas Gripen jets at noon on Thursday," Goranson told the Swedish national radio broadcaster, EKOT.

The Russian bombers, which are capable of carrying nuclear warheads, resumed their normal routes after the interception, he added.

Nordic nations had agreed in April to boost their defense ties, increase solidarity with Baltic states, and conduct joint military exercises amid deteriorating relations with Russia, calling it "the biggest challenge to European Security".

Defense ministers of Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Iceland and Finland said in a joint declaration on April 9 that their countries must be prepared for emergencies that might arise.

The ministers said in the declaration published in the Norwegian daily Aftenposten: "(Russia) has shown that it is ready to use military means to achieve their political goals, even when it involves violations of international law."

"There is increasing military and intelligence activity in the Baltics and in our northern areas," the ministers said.

"The Russian military is challenging us along our borders and there have been several border infringements in the Baltics," they added.

The heightened tensions also led to the traditionally neutral Scandinavian countries to upgrade their defense capabilities. Finland and Sweden are not NATO-member countries, but they have increased their cooperation with the Alliance in response to what they call "Russian aggression".

Sweden had accused Russia in October last year of having a submarine in Swedish territorial waters. Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Igor Konashenkov later accused the Swedish government of hyping-up tensions in the Baltic Sea region.

Sweden and Denmark also summoned their respective Russian ambassadors in December 2014 in response to a Russian military plane reportedly turning off its location device and nearly colliding with a Swedish civilian airliner.

Russia was accused of violating Finnish airspace with its aircraft three times in a week in late August 2014 and twice in May the same year.

A Russian Tu-95 bomber was intercepted off the coast of Japan on two separate occasions on March 20, according to the Japanese Ministry of Defense, the International Business Times reported three days later.

Reuters had run a story on Jan. 20, saying in the three quarters to Dec. 31, Japanese jets scrambled 369 times to meet Russian planes, four times the pace of a decade ago, citing Japan's Defense Ministry.

Only a day after the Japanese incident, six Russian warplanes were intercepted near Latvia's territorial waters on March 21.

And in the week prior, Spanish and Italian NATO jets intercepted Russian planes in international airspace near Latvia, while Russian submarines were seen in the country's exclusive economic zone, just 27 miles (43.45 kilometers) from the start of Latvia's territorial waters and 39 miles (62.76 kilometers) from its coastline, IB Times reported.

In January, Typhoon jets were dispatched from RAF Lossiemouth in Scotland and RAF Coningsby in Lincolnshire to intercept two Russian bombers capable of carrying nuclear missiles as they flew south of Bournemouth, according to Daily Mail.

On Feb. 17, HMS Argyll reportedly intercepted a Neustrashimy-class warship and its accompanying tanker as they headed home after a deployment in the Mediterranean in the English Channel.

Two days later, two RAF Typhoon jets scrambled from RAF Coningsby in Lincolnshire to escort two Russian bombers in international airspace off the coast of Cornwall.

On Tuesday, two Turkish F-16 fighter jets on an aerial patrol intercepted a Russian warplane within engagement rules when it intruded into Turkish airspace on the Turkey-Syria border.

The intruding aircraft was warned about the violation 10 times within five minutes before it was shot down.

Russian Defense Ministry confirmed that its Russian SU-24 fighter jet had been shot down, which crashed in the Syrian region of Bayirbucak close to Yayladagi district of southern Hatay province.

NATO confirmed the accuracy of the radar trace data that Turkey shared which clearly showed that the Russian warplane violated Turkish airspace.

This was not the first time Russian fighter jets had violated Turkish airspace. In early October, Russian warplanes had breached Turkish airspace for which Russian officials apologized and pledged that no such incident would be repeated; Turkey had also renewed its warning to implement engagement rules, including military response against violations of Turkish airspace.

Sept 16th
Japan protests after 'Russian' plane enters airspace - Yahoo News
 
.
I am with Russia but I have USA flag and jet engine in my fighters.
Yes, totally Im wrong.
 
.
You don't count international airspace incursions, otherwise we have like 1,000 incursions per year from our lovely American friend. LOL also it is worth noting that testing each other response is a friendly military competition. In the end none of those you cited result in jet showdown like Turkey did to Russia. Beside Turkey is not innocent either. You intrude and violate other country airspace as well. Can't take what you did? In addition, the standard international rule of engagement is to escort, especially no threat is pose. Now apparently Turkey set up its own version of rule of engagement. If that is the case, then Russia will have every rights to shoot down. Turkey if you I tried against Russia or its Allies airspace. The game is on and everyone will have to accept this new rule of engagement between Turkey and Russia.
 
.
You don't count international airspace incursions, otherwise we have like 1,000 incursions per year from our lovely American friend. LOL also it is worth noting that testing each other response is a friendly military competition. In the end none of those you cited result in jet showdown like Turkey did to Russia. Beside Turkey is not innocent either. You intrude and violate other country airspace as well. Can't take what you did? In addition, the standard international rule of engagement is to escort, especially no threat is pose. Now apparently Turkey set up its own version of rule of engagement. If that is the case, then Russia will have every rights to shoot down. Turkey if you I tried against Russia or its Allies airspace. The game is on and everyone will have to accept this new rule of engagement between Turkey and Russia.

True, it is not noteworthy..just like airspace violations in the South China Sea islands that China gets all worked up about.
 
.
Russia constantly push the limit but it never warrants an attack, its just a game. They did kill almost 300 people in the 80s though for an airspace violation.
 
.
...the standard international rule of engagement is to escort,...
Repeating the same misunderstanding will not make it true. There is no such standard ROE.

To escort is essentially a courtesy and only when both sides want to see each other visually. But when the local region is in military turmoil, which in this case mean several countries who borders each other and there are internal civil wars in at least two countries, such courtesy is usually discarded. If Turkish airspace had repeated violations, Turkey is under full rights and responsibilities to respond militarily and if the Turks can prove that they had warned Russia, meaning made it clear to Russia at the DIPLOMATIC level, which should trickle down to the local regional Russian commanders, any Russian losses from Turkish military response falls squarely on Russia.

I know you have no interests in the truth but only propagating lies to support Russia, but here is the truth for all to see...

The Avalon Project - Laws of War : Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land (Hague V); October 18, 1907
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom